Thursday, August 20, 2020

Fighters of Free Speech, Victims of Islamofacism

 I would like to collect the names of people who got killed for speaking their mind and people who were victims of Islamofacism. 

India

Kamlesh Tiwari: He responded to insult used by SP leader Ajam Khan about RSS pracharaks and he was killed by two Muslims at his home. Akbaruddin Owaisi insulted Sita mata in rally, that made him secular leader.

Rajpal : A pamphlet published and distributed by some Muslims in Lahore, depicting the Hindu goddess Sita as a prostitute. To protest, Aryasamaji Pandit Chamupati wrote Rangeela Rasul in 1927, on the life of Mohammed. Rajpal was the publisher of the book, he didn't reveal name of the author. There were several attempts on his life, he was stabbed to death by a carpenter named Ilm-ud-din on 6 April 1929. It is banned in India. Dont forget to read the book, pdf is available on internet. 

Swami Shraddhanand: He was a social worker, sanyasi and Freedom Fighter. His work included widow remarriage, fighting un-touchability, bringing Hindus who converted to Islam and Christianity back to the fold. He was killed by Abdul Rashid, when he was sick, resting in his room. 

Bangladesh

In Bangladesh violent Jihadist circulated a list with more than 80 names of free thinkers whom they wished to kill.  Most of them were atheist. By 2 July 2016 a total of 48 people, including 20 foreign nationals, were killed

Dr Avijit Roy: U.S. citizen and founder of the influential Bangladeshi blog Mukto-Mona ("Freethinkers"). Killed by machete in 2015, when he came to Bangladesh to participate in some events. His wifes fingers were chopped. 

Ananta Bijoy Das: He was an atheist blogger.   He had authored three books on science, evolution, and revolution in the Soviet Union, and headed the Sylhet-based science and rationalist council. 

Niloy Chakroborty: Six men armed with machetes attacked him at his home in the Goran neighborhood of Dhaka and hacked him to death. Niloy had written in Mukto-Mona, a blogging platform for secularists and freethinkers, was associated with the Shahbag Movement. He had attended the public protest demanding justice for the murdered bloggers, Ananta Bijoy Das and Avijit Roy.

Mong Shwe Lung Marma: A Buddhist farmer and the vice president of ward seven of the Awami league. The victim was killed near the site of a previous killing of another Buddhist. 

Shyamananda Das: A Hindu temple worker, was hacked to death by three suspected Islamic militants on motorcycles in the Satkhira district.

Not possible to write about everyone here. 

Netherlands

Theo van Gogh: He was a film director, actor, producer and author. He was shot and stabbed on 2 Nov 2004, a letter was pinned to his chest by use of a dagger, also injured some bystanders and left on the scene a note containing death threats to Ayaan Hirsi Ali, who went into hiding. The note also threatened Western countries and Jews. 

Theo was working on Working from a script written by Ayaan Hirsi Ali, van Gogh created the 10-minute short film Submission. The movie deals with violence against women in some Islamic societies; it tells the stories, using visual shock tactics, of four abused Muslim women. The title, Submission, is a translation of the word "Islam" into English.

His last book (2003) was Allah weet het beter ("Allah Knows Best"), in which he strongly condemned Islam. 


Denmark 

Kurt Westergaard:   A Danish cartoonist who created the controversial cartoon of a terrorist, although not the Islamic prophet Muhammad as it is often claimed, wearing a bomb in his turban. Since the drawing of the cartoon, Westergaard has received numerous death threats and been a target of assassination attempts. As a result, he is under constant police protection. 

France

Charlie Hebdo Shooting: Stéphane Charbonnier and 11 more people were killed by gunmen. The cover of a 2011 issue retitled Charia Hebdo (French for Sharia Weekly), featured a cartoon of Muhammad. 

But the magazine also published time to time more satirical work on Christianity and Judaism, but that did not cause any danger!

Pakistan

Tahir Ahmad Naseem: An american citizen he was lured into coming to Pakistan and arrested under blasphemy case. During trial he was attending court and a guy shot him. That guy is a hero now. 

Pastor Rashid Emanuel: Pastor Rashid Emmanuel and his brother Sajid, who were Christians. The brothers were shot and killed while being escorted by the police from a district court. Both had denied the charge of blasphemy.

Shahbaz Bhatti : Pakistan's Federal Minister for Minorities Affairs (a Roman Catholic member of the National Assembly), was killed by gunmen in Islamabad as he was travelling to work, a few weeks after he had vowed to defy death threats over his efforts to reform Pakistan's blasphemy laws.

Salman Taseer: He was governor of Punjab, was shot 27 times by his own bodyguard Mumtaj Qadri. He tried to help Asia Bibi, the poor christian lady who was in trials in a Blasphemy case. Later Asia Bibi was acquitted as there was no proof. 


List is too long. Cant write. Between 1987 and 2017 at least 1,500 people were charged with blasphemy and at least 75 people involved in accusations of blasphemy were killed in Pakistan, according to official figure. 

Not one of them was hanged after trial, but they were killed by guards, or public or something like that. 

Pakistan has blasphemy laws which makes it difficult for any non muslim to defend himself. 

PPC  295B Defiling, etc., of Quran. Punishment: Imprisonment for life.

PPC  295C      Use of derogatory remarks, spoken, written, directly or indirectly, etc. defiles the name of Muhammad.  Punishment: Mandatory Death and fine. Trial must take place in a Court of Session with a Muslim judge presiding. 













Wednesday, August 19, 2020

Connection of Christianity and Islam with Judaism, Short Story.

Islam is a poor copy of Judaism and Christianity.

There is not much difference between Islam and Judaism, except for the fact that if you discuss about Islam in public, some Muslim may slit your throat. 

Source of most of things in Abrahamic religions is old Hebrew Bible from which Christian adopted most of the content and later Mohammed also seems to have done so. Monotheism was a Judaistic practice. Jews believed in only one God, and their temple had no idols, no symbol for God. Elsewhere the world then worshipped many deities. 

Jerusalem is holiest site of Jews. For Jews it is the place where most of divine things were done. God created humanity from Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden, which Jews think was in Jerusalem. Jewish king Solomon, son of the King David, built first temple in Jerusalem in 957 BCE on the hill area called Temple Mount, destroyed by Babylonian (Syria-Iraq) rulers. Second temple was built in 516 BCE, destroyed by Romans in 70 BCE. Orthodox Jewish tradition maintains it is here that the third and final Temple will also be built when the Messiah comes. 

Above: Artistic view of temple at Jerusalem. 

Muslims in the beginning prayed towards Jerusalem. Mohammed considered himself to be Messiah. In the life of Mohammed Muslims prayed toward Jerusalem for almost two decades, just like Jews. Only later Mohammed got another revelation from angel Gabriel to change direction of prayer to the Kaba, when he was  rejected by Jews. Kaba was the Arab pagan holy site. 

Mohammed never lived in Jerusalem, unlike Jesus Christ and Jews. Still in order to claim Jerusalem, the holiest religious site of Abrahamic faith, on his death Muslims claim Mohammed overnight flew from Mecca to Jerusalem on the winged baby horse Buraq and ascended to heaven from the same site in Jerusalem, sort of claiming him being Messiah. Muslims later conquered Jerusalem in war and Umayyad built Al-Aqsa mosque and Dome of the Rock here. Jews are still waiting for the Messiah. 

Temple Mount (Haram Al Sharif) also has the site, where one stone is there at which Abraham tried to sacrifice his son. Dome of Rock is was previously a church built by Romans. Octagonal shape and many pillars of dome of rock indicate Christian architecture. Muslims destroyed the Church and claimed it for themselves. Jews consider it to be part of the land of Temple Mount.  

Quran 17:1

Glory to Him who made His servant travel by night from the sacred place of worship (in Mecca) to the furthest place of worship (Jerusalem Mosque), whose surroundings We have blessed, to show him some of Our signs. He alone is the All Hearing, the All Seeing. 

Mohammed flying to heaven 

Before Islam, Arabs prayed to many Gods and Goddesses. Kaba was a holy site for the various Arabic tribes. Once a month in every lunar year, the tribes would make a pilgrimage to Mecca. Setting aside any tribal feuds, they would worship their gods in the Kaaba and trade with each other. During this sacred month, all violence was forbidden, and it was possible to participate in pilgrimages and fairs without danger.

Jews were everywhere in trading towns in Arabia. They were better in status and education, authority on religious and philosophical matters and most of trade was dominated by Jews. English word Judge and  has Jewish origin, comes from 7th book of Hebrew Bible. 

Mohammed was ambitious person. One can see this throughout his journey of life. He got into trade at age of 25 by his marriage to 40 year old widowed business lady Khadizah in Mecca. Mohammed traveled from Mecca to Syria etc. on his trade route and he experienced and learned things from Jews and Christians. I would guess that Mohammed used this experience and learned things to the ends he wanted. Mohammed mixed little bit of Arabic things in it and wanted to be accepted as Messiah by Jews and Pagan Arabs in Mecca. Most of the things Mohammed talked are connected to Hebrew Bible or Old Testament. In Jewish thing, they are waiting for Messiah and Mohammed wanted to claim that he is the one. So initially he copied them and later he hated them and killed them for not accepting him as the Messiah. Same way Quran was filled with texts hateful about Jews. That is the story.

Similar with Christians. Jesus was a Jew. He tried magic etc, he sort of claimed to be Messiah. Jews didn't accept him as one, complaining to Roman authority, who crucified Jesus. After a while some of his disciples started a branch separate from Jews, called Christianity. A small insignificant sect until Roman king Constantine sees some opportunity and becomes Christian and promotes it for his own interests.

Jews were a nation state, people of the kingdom of Judah (areas around Jerusalem) called themselves Jew. they developed the culture called Judaism, just like people across the Sindhu river were called Hindu and developed the culture called Hinduism. Jerusalem is Hebrew word, Yireh meaning foundation (name given to the place where Abraham planned to sacrifice his son), and Shalem meaning peace. 

Unlike Judaism, Christianity and Islam started from Jesus Christ and Mohammed, without any land or people. They didn't have community, they had to create the community. So we see that Jews don't  proselytize, while proselytizing is major part of Islam and Christianity. Christianity comes from Christ (Jesus Christ) plus -ity (referring to the state, property, or quality of Christ here). Islam means submission, surrender. Muslim means to be 'whole or intact'. To be a Muslim you must completely submit to the will of Allah as who sent Mohammed as his his messenger. Any other relation to anything, anyone is secondary. Allah is related to word Elah is the Aramaic word for God, found in the Hebrew Bible in the books of Ezra, Jeremiah. 

Jews have three pillars of religion, charity, prayer and faith. Muslim have two extra, making it five. One Hajj, two fasting. Both of these came from Pagan culture in Arab. Even the words are same for these things. In Hebrew Charity  is Tzedakah, in Islam it is Zakah or Zakat. I guess Mohammed added these two later when Jews rejected him as their Messiah. His hurt ego sought refuge in Arabic symbols.

Jewish prayer and Muslim prayer are structurally similar. Jews pray three times a day, Muslims pray five times a day.  Three prayer clock times (in morning, afternoon and evening) of Muslims and Jews are same in Jerusalem. Main prayer day is Friday for both, Friday is vacation in only Islamic countries and Israel.  Day of Saturday is called Sabat in both Jews and Muslim and is rest day for both. If you see an orthodox Jew praying you will confuse him being a Muslim. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0aHWASyMjwg&t=455s

Same way Jews give call to prayer (Shema Yisrael) like azan. Except Muslim make azan bit melodic, and Jew produce straight loud sound.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fUSdHB1R-W4

------------------------------- ------------Jewish Prayer----------------------------------------------------------------

"Sh'ma Yisrael Adonai Eloheinu Adonai Eḥad...."

"Hear, O Israel: the LORD is our God, the LORD is One. Blessed be the name of His glorious kingdom for ever and ever. And you shall love the Lord, your God with all your heart, all your might......"

--------------------------------------Muslim Prayer-------------------------------------------------------------------

"Allah is greater. I bear witness that there is no God but Allah. I bear witness that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah. Hasten to the prayer, Hasten to the salvation. ........."

------------------------------------- Dua of Sunni-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Dua has to be repeated silently after the call of Muezzin

“I bear witness that there is no god but God alone with no partner and that Muhammad is His servant and Messenger, and the Lord God's chosen messenger is Muhammad and Islam is his religion.”

“O Allah, sanctify Muhammad and the Progeny of Muhammad, as you have sanctified Ibrahim and the Progeny of Ibrahim. Truly, You are Praised and Glorious. O Allah, bless Muhammad and the Progeny of Muhammad, as you have blessed Ibrahim and the Progeny of Ibrahim. Truly, You are Glorious.”

“O Allah! Lord of this perfect call and of the established prayer, give Muhammad the right of intercession and illustriousness, and resurrect him to the best and the praised position that You have covenanted him.”

Muhammad said: "Repeat the words of the muezzin and when you finish, ask God what you want and you will get it"

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Think about the aims of the person, behind prayer.  Think what effect this has on people who repeat it five times a day. 

Supernatural beings, called angels (malakhim) appear first in Hebrew Bible. Seven archangels are the first angels to exist, the earliest reference to a system of seven archangels as a group, appears to be in Enoch I in Hebrew Bible. 

Mohammed claimed to get everything through conversations with angel Gabriel. 

Look very carefully at this detailed painting of Gabriel, painted by Italian painter Pinturicchio in 15th century. She is the medium through which Quran came. Source of all the law and morality on the earth, which seals fate of a human, or animal or plants or stones in the Islamic world. 


Let us continue.

Jews greet each other saying Shalom Aleichem, Muslim say Assalam Walekum. They both write right to left. Wrote learning and speaking aloud religious text that is also a Jewish thing. 

Jewish have Star symbol, Muslim have star and crescent. Crescent is related to Arabs. They put cap on head same way, having same meaning for both of them. They circumcise the penis same way. Circumcision was introduced by Prophet Moses of the Jews, and  Muslims in Indonesia still call it Jahudi-Sasi. Halal and Kosher is almost the same ritual. Both of them don't eat pork and both slit the throat of animal and let it bleed. Marriage contract Ketubah in Jews is signed by Rabbai is quite similar to Nikah, similar rituals. Concepts regarding burial, after death justice, day of judgement, heaven. hell, hellfire are same in Judaism, Christianity and Islam. 

Burka is not a new concept. Orthodox Jewish women are supposed to cover hair and other things. And burka is an extreme adoption of that. Judaism prohibits shaving with a razor, similar in Muslims shaving beard is considered haram. Rituals of ablutions before prayer are similar in Jews and Muslims. And even toilet etiquette are similar. 


This pic (source National Photo Collection of Israel) shows Jewish Yemenite women and children in a refugee camp near Aden, Yemen in 1949.

All the prophets before Jesus are common between Jews and Christians. In Islam Jesus and last Mohammed is added. Muslim sacrifice animal to recall Abraham sacrifice his son Ishmael to God. Well Abraham is in Jewish texts and he attempted to sacrifice his son at the Temple Mount in Jerusalem where king Solomon built the Jewish temple. 

Adam became Aadam, Abraham became Ibrahim, Solomon became Suleman, Isaac became Ishaq, Moses became Musa, David became Dawood and so on. Qurban is a Jewish word, Jew used to offer sacrifice of animals to the God at Temple Mount, until temple was destroyed. Jews believe they can offer sacrifice again only after the Messiah has came and built the temple at the location. For Muslim Messiah already came and he was Mohammed. 

Islam then got divided between Shia and Sunni further over successors of Mohammed in political sense. Remember Mohammed was not just religious head of Muslims he was also their sole political leader. Sunni Islam maintains Abu Bakr to be the first leader after Muhammad on the basis of election. Shia Islam holds that Ali ibn Abi Talib was the appointed successor to the Muhammad as head of the community. Ahmedia sect believe Mirza Ghulam Ahmad is another Messiah, that's why they are hunted by Muslims. Islam has relegated all the prophets before Mohamed to secondary level, where they are useful only to the extent that they support prophet-hood of Mohammed and explanations about past. Christian did same with all the prophets before Jesus. Their obsession with only one true version of everything coming out through Mohammed and Jesus respectively is source of all religious conflict, they don't tolerate anything else on the earth. Christians in the medieval Europe hated Jews, Muslim hate Jews to the extent that they won't rest till they have finished them politically and individually. And Christian and Muslim hate each other. 

There is eternal dispute over Temple Mount, over Tomb of Abraham in Hebron. If Muslims don't get along with Jew and Christian (who are people of the book, with whom they share so much, but on one major point about Mohammed), then they will never bend themselves to go along with eastern view of life which is extremely different. 

My mother talked about stories of ghosts etc, her ideas didn't jump magically. She told the similar stories most of other Hindu moms would tell. Most of people have similarly borrowed ideas. If I live in India, I will have dreams in which a Hindu God will appear giving me some prasadam If I was born in Netherlands, I might be dreaming being served Cheese and Meatball by Jesus Christ speaking Dutch language. I can intentionally create dream stories or because of credulity or mental issues, or I can believe my dreams. If I was born in Arabia in 7th century, I wont have dreams which a Shinto Japanese will have or someone in Maya civilization will have, or talk about things which exists in New York today.

If an ordinary intelligence officer and a psychiatrist were to descend to 7th and 1st century, Islam or Christianity could be analyzed like a normal case without any difficulty. 

I think Voltaire already did it. 

In a 1740 letter to Frederick II of Prussia, Voltaire ascribes to Muhammad a brutality that "is assuredly nothing any man can excuse" and suggests that his following stemmed from superstition; Voltaire continued, "But that a camel-merchant should stir up insurrection in his village; that in league with some miserable followers he persuades them that he talks with the angel Gabriel; that he boasts of having been carried to heaven, where he received in part this unintelligible book, each page of which makes common sense shudder; that, to pay homage to this book, he delivers his country to iron and flame; that he cuts the throats of fathers and kidnaps daughters; that he gives to the defeated the choice of his religion or death: this is assuredly nothing any man can excuse, at least if he was not born a Turk, or if superstition has not extinguished all natural light in him."

Book: Fanaticism, or Mahomet the Prophet

https://www.amazon.com/Fanaticism-Mahomet-Prophet-Voltaire/dp/1936117819

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Town of Hebron has grave of Abraham, his wife Sara, Isaac, Jacob and other biblical ancestors, which Muslims captured in 12th Century, is second holiest place for Jews. Because Abraham was a Jew. 


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Debate and Islam

Muslim can win debate only in two situation, one when anchor is on their side, second when other side is stupid or docile. 

In any other situation when a Muslim is loosing debate,  he will just show anger, aggression, abuse or play victim card or start straight lies, to hide his fear for truth, Muslims do it every day everywhere in the world.  A single truth and their complete faith shakes.

If still they loose then they compensate it with backstabbing and violent means afterwards. 
Many times they just don't care for debate or other opinion, it is just a bluff or show. They are clear in mind, if other side is not of same view, must be killed, let the fool debate, I will teach him a lesson with bullet, until then use the camouflage of debate.

Not to say, Muslims have no regard for any value, knowledge, which contradicts Koran and which is not in their favor. Muslim doesn't come to debate, he comes to connive you to believe that dominion of Islam is above everything, every human right.

Islam is a cult which shakes on a single question, which starts from the believe that apostasy is punishable by death, they say Islam spread by persuasion, and you object to it, they bring violence. 

___________________________________________________________________________________

What binds Islam?

It is physical threat, which binds Islam, unlike Christianity where threat only exists in after life, in Islam it lays clear political and inter human road-map. As slowly people learn science, Christianity is falling apart. Islam will fall once physical fear is eliminated.

Islam cant stand test of logic, so moment u wish to question it, Quran hits you back with threat of violence in this life and heaven in afterlife of believer, power in this life of believer.

It is just like AMWAY product cant stand in open Indian market so it uses multi-level marketing technique in India. Islam survives by army of believers Muslims which once born in one country they perpetuate it to satisfy their political, financial and emotional needs. So Islam technique of threat coupled with practical reward it brings in this life to Muslims who perpetuate this threat works elegantly.

The ideologies which cant stand test of logic for a minute, survive on physical threat, material greed, narcissism, they thrive on vulnerability of human condition and promise to give a sense of security and claim supernatural merit which is so easy in such conditions. They bank on desire for self pride (and off course willingness of mastery over others) when faced with hard realities. It progresses like multi-layer market (like some products which cant stand open market). Each new agent wants to bring many new under its fold, in order to justify his belief. Technique of threat coupled with reward and shelter it brings to these mentally bankrupt (in many cases weak and ignorant) agents who perpetuate ideology are very practical, it keeps flock glued and surging. Such ideologies are burden on humanity but thanks to hypocrisy we will let it grow until and slowly we all submit conveniently to become beneficiaries and it remains for our great great grand grand children to realize after enormous loss, may be after 10,000 years later that it is farce. So much for our passion for truth, bravery and wisdom.

___________________________________________________________________________________

Osho on Islam

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WpA05rYBALM

Muslims and Mohammed burned all the books, religious texts of Arabia from before. Quran also has a lot of things stolen from books of Zoroastrians. 

Many of Islamic stories are copies of Jewish folk tales. It comes from Talmud, Jewish commentary on traditions, so Quran doesn't have divine origin. 


Sunday, August 9, 2020

Where There is 100% Reservation, Roots of Corruption in India.

A lot of my kin too are govt employee. Still I will say this. 

Nobody talks about this reservation, which makes other reservations have a negative impact. It is reservation of govt employees to do nothing, stay incompetent and no accountability. Still they will stay in their positions for life. 

Why is it that govt employees don't get fired like private employees? They should get fired. A govt employee should be made as responsible for his actions as an employee in Infosys, Wipro and Adani is made. 

Why is it that a govt teacher has lots of complaint in spite of getting 60-70000 salary, and spending his time in private tuition and farming, while private teacher teacher works for 5000 in villages, and 10-20 in towns. 

For a work which can be done by two person there are ten person in govt work. 

This debate about reservation is not a competition for serving the country but having share in the loot of the country. 

If accountability is fixed on output, say a govt teacher gets fired if students don't like him, like in private coaching center, then it doesn't matter whether teacher was SC/ST or whatever, as long as he is productive it is good. 

A govt employee should even be fired if a more competent employee can be found. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vb1i66SZcl4

Entire discourse about reservation started because it was a loot, and everyone wanted more share in loot. 

Moment it becomes hard work, output will be better and people will serve instead of quarreling. 

If govt employees have complain they should better quit the job. They are not doing social service. They are servants of the taxpayer. 

The claim that they have passed such and such exam is untenable. If they are really capable, then they ought not beg for govt job or hide in the safety of vote-bank castle, but start up on their own, produce something, or do something which will employ five people. People of many nations and countries who worked hard and built something out of nothing,  they dont make any such claim.   

To me  a memorizing a lot of information which wont bring any value to the job is as worthless as if I fill the water in the bucket and I say I sent rocket to the moon. Any exam which doesn't increase output of employees is a sham. 

Govt exams are just a filtering process most of the time. They can select people by making people wrestle or play Kabaddi or they can take exam. Most of the time work has poor relation with exam taken. Exam is just to satisfy ego of  selfish public. 

If there is competition for postman, anyone who can read and write should fill in the job of postman. Then why this sham of competition? Why not instead let there be competition in work, say for example that that a employee has to work six days a week and 10 hours a day instead until people are motivated to the optimum/maximum work output? Rules can be changed. 40 hours cant be sacrosanct when output is not sacrosanct. How can luxury of employee be the criteria when too many others go hungry, not in a country like India. 

Unless things function there is no point in it. We cant have an elephant, to keep mahawat fed. 

Govt employees are another vote bank like Muslim vote bank. Govt job is a loot tantra, people blackmail govt that if new pay commission doesn't come they will bring down govt. Such criminal behavior has become habit and has been baptized by public. 

Country of thugs. 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A friend forwarded it on whatsapp. 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This is how government officials often behave. 


This officer was caught taking bribe, but only punishment is transfer, which is no punishment. Nobody cares, neither politician not people. 






Tuesday, July 7, 2020

Voltaire, Gustave Le Bon, Indian Left, Islam, Hinduism

I have always argued that Indian JNU and AMU think tank is not a leftist think tank but a gang of Islamist and self serving non-Muslim mercenaries veiled as communist. Both of these have hijacked the narrative, they find each other complementary and serve each other under Indian leftist umbrella. They dont allow any real leftist to get in.

Just an example how left and Islamist work together

Karl Marx was born to Jewish parents. Israel was a socialist country until 1980s. But Indian leftist liberals hate Israel and love Marx at the same time. What is relation of Indian leftists with Islamic Arab countries, except Islam? 1999 when parliament is held after Loksabha, on the first day, first question of Palestine Israel was raised by left parties and house is adjourned amid the raucous. What makes Palestine so important for left parties? Close to my house, there was office of CPI-ML, every year on the eve of 6th December they organized huge protests with thousands of poor people participating in the rally. What makes left so much attached to Babri structure? Left parties supported Muslim League and idea of Pakistan before 1947. Karl Marx said "..Religion is opium of masses..". Opium of Indian leftist is Islam. Track details of any Muslim leftist in India, he is hardcore Islamist and so called atheist leftist born in Hindu families are complicit. 

Birth of liberal world is often ascribed to the age of Voltaire.

During French Revolution, in Kangaroo court called French Convention, those who wanted position of king to be completely removed sat on left and those who wanted a weak king plus people rule sat on the right.

Ask you liberal friends to study Voltaire or hold a discussion exhibition on Views of Voltaire on Islam.

Voltaire "Secularisme"


European definition of secular is derived from Voltaire's definition of "secularisme".  Secularism has its origins in the Enlightenment. Voltaire asked people to turn away from a notion of God and claimed to be able to find answers to existential questions purely within human knowledge and science. Secularization refers to the increasing orientation of man on this world, the earthly. 

In India secularism has come to mean blind respect of Muslim narrative. 

Voltaire views about Islam 


Voltaire's views about Islam were generally negative, and he found its holy book, the Quran, to be ignorant of the laws of physics. In a 1740 letter to Frederick II of Prussia, Voltaire ascribes to Muhammad a brutality that "is assuredly nothing any man can excuse" and suggests that his following stemmed from superstition; Voltaire continued, "But that a camel-merchant should stir up insurrection in his village; that in league with some miserable followers he persuades them that he talks with the angel Gabriel; that he boasts of having been carried to heaven, where he received in part this unintelligible book, each page of which makes common sense shudder; that, to pay homage to this book, he delivers his country to iron and flame; that he cuts the throats of fathers and kidnaps daughters; that he gives to the defeated the choice of his religion or death: this is assuredly nothing any man can excuse, at least if he was not born a Turk, or if superstition has not extinguished all natural light in him."

Refernce: https://archive.org/details/oeuvrescomplete09voltgoog

he wrote again about Mohammed and Islam in "De l'Alcoran et de Mahomet" ("On the Quran and on Mohammed"). In this essay, Voltaire maintained that Mohammed was a "sublime charlatan". Drawing on complementary information in Herbelot's "Oriental Library", Voltaire, according to René Pomeau, adjudged the Quran, with its "contradictions, ... absurdities, ... anachronisms", to be "rhapsody, without connection, without order, and without art".

Fanaticism, or Mahomet the Prophet

https://www.amazon.com/Fanaticism-Mahomet-Prophet-Voltaire/dp/1936117819/ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&keywords=mahomet+voltaire&qid=1594116418&sr=8-1

He wrote in this play, about Mohammed tricking his son Zaid to divorce his wife Zainab, so that he can marry her. 

Voltaire on Hinduism

Commenting on the sacred texts of the Hindus, the Vedas, Voltaire observed: The Veda was the most precious gift for which the West had ever been indebted to the East.

He regarded Hindus as "a peaceful and innocent people, equally incapable of hurting others or of defending themselves." Voltaire was himself a supporter of animal rights and was a vegetarian. He used the antiquity of Hinduism to land what he saw as a devastating blow to the Bible's claims and acknowledged that the Hindus' treatment of animals showed a shaming alternative to the immorality of European imperialists.

Story of a Good Brahmin

https://www.k-state.edu/english/baker/english287/Voltaire-Story_of_a_Good_Brahmin.htm

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/9137064-story-of-a-good-brahmin


Gustave le Bon on India


The world of Indian civilization

https://www.amazon.com/world-Indian-civilization/dp/0814805817/ref=sr_1_4?dchild=1&keywords=gustave+le+bon+india&qid=1594116497&sr=8-4


What Muslims think about Left


Karl Marx had said that religion is Opium of masses.
Communism in India, from supporting partition in 1946-47 to taking support of a Muslim Religious cleric Abbas Siddhqui.


This is Indian quality, they borrow everything like democracy or communism or technology, universities form the west only for namesake. Inside they work with the same selfish spineless mentality, in which everything other than self interest is an illusion.

Here democracy has been morphed into another contract, no party has internal democracy. Sonia, Mamata, Lalu, Mulayam, Karunanidhi, Thakre, Badals, Devegowda, etc are like old wine in the new bottle, old feudal mindset and the need for an external arbitrator, ruler in Indian masses.

Strategic Mistake by Indian Centre 

We make strategic mistake by not distinguishing between communism and Islamism. India's so called communists are Islamism in all essence, only they cover it in communism  to get acceptability of communism. We must not call them communist. Tarek fatah is real communist, I have similar views I am communist. Communist meaning Anti-India is fake. we always made this strategic mistake.

We play in their hands by giving them respect  of communism. It is just like secularism is not bad, secularism didn't succeed in India because it was never secularism. It was Islamism.

They shoot on us behind the forts of secularism and communism and we keep fighting from outside and dying, never applying common sense to capture that fort which rightfully belongs to us.

and Last any war wont be successful unless ki ham billi ke gale me ghanti bandhe.

She the shameless parents of Kanhaiya Kumar

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5GpZ9I8DOg0

To this goes my facebook post.

Many are pointing finger on politicians, media, Mulla. While the real culprit always sits with us, dines with us, everything. Traitors were always socially acceptable in India, with full intention. One kejriwal is exposed, people will find another. While people (friends, relatives, every other relation) will always conveniently sit down until they get opportunity to be part of some AAP, Congress, media etc. Billi ke gale me ghanti kaun bandhe. Kaun bolega ki hamare so called dost, rishte wo hi asli gaddar hain. Kaun bolega ki bharat me culture ke naam pe hypocrisy hoti hai. Kaun bolega ki hamare maa baap hame sirf kaise bhi paisa aur power pana sikhate hain? Bring a adult from any other normal country, put him in any kind of school, he wont say his country murdabad. This special skill of deception Indian parents equip their children with.

JNU is just tip of iceberg, every panchayat has JNU type people. They were supported by students in Cambridge Harvard. 




Moderate Islam doesn't Exist


Moderate Muslims, they create situation of victim-hood, they are being attacked, victimized, they justify every act of militants. They invent a reason for feeling denied. The only thing remains is to some crazy from group going overboard and becoming terrorist.

Once I asked my Hindu friends not to say things like take revenge and  ek ka badla char se lenge. Just inform people, pretending to be ultra-liberal. Inform everything how they were treated as third class in India and things will automatically happen, automatically they will organize and take revenge. Same way moderate Islam works. They create the peaceful explosive. And some strays use it. But they say they cant be blamed for blowing up. 

It is like I need to get talaq from my wife (assume), so what I will do is I will spread rumours, victim hood and everything, one day my mother, brother everyone will say throw this whore, and I they will throw her out. Without doing anything get it done.

Another analogy, when one needs to have sex with a girl, he can go straight to girl and girl will never agree in most cases, he will be maligned also. Another way is to pretend to be good enough to for girl to come close and slowly slowly drown her. Make girl feel warm enough that she herself will become mad about  you, and then you can manipulate her emotions also taking advantage of her emotional dependence, now its her fault, not yours. This analogy is directly used by Muslims to fool Hindu/Sikh and White girls.

Moderate Muslims have same role in creating terrorists. They pretend to be moderate to save their face in international community. They keep the pot boiling enjoying liberalism of west and Hindus and someone among them who is susceptible to heat, does it, blows up or kills, others say no we did not tell him to blow, you didn't tell him to blow up but you did everything which convinced him to blowing himself up for a right cause. They enjoy the prospect of others blowing up for Islamic imperialism.

September October 2022
Contrast, when women in Iran are risking everything to get free from Hijab, Indian leftists have found their new moto in Burka (which they call Hijab, playing with words). That is their worldview, that is how retrogressive and negative left is. Leftist males should wear bangles and sit at home, Iranian ladies have shown much more courage which most men don't show.









Sunday, May 3, 2020

Insanity in Indian History Books about British involvement in Partition

Has to be read in conjunction with this blog
http://danasurdanu.blogspot.com/2014/07/1945-1946-elections-who-voted-for.html

Indian political system has been Childish and Devilish at once.

British early were racist and imperialist, as seen in the words of their philosophers like Maxmuller (Germany by birth)
 

But Indian leftist historians didn't criticize them for that part. People like Irfan Habib, Romila Thapar gave boost to Aryan invasion theory. Aim of Aryan invasion theory was to break the Hindus. 

On the other hand we have put a lot of false things about British in History, who were by no means any friend of ours at all on large, except individuals like Anie Beseant. This has been done to save the real culprits (Islamofacists) who are more important for Leftists than British. 
Indian History books highly exaggerate and entire blame of partition has been put on British (specifically intent of partition). As if British spent their entire time conspiring to partition India and their life depended on it.

History books in Pakistan portray India and Hindus as enemy till eternity and make no unpleasant reference to British. 
Since we don't have courage to talk about these Pakistani crooks and their allies in Indian think tanks and universities, we satisfy our ego and self worth by blaming British.
Except the conquests of Shivaji and Ranjit Singh, we don't have any significant victory to our name in last 1000 years. And we don't want to feel proud of Shivaji, lest our Muslim brother in laws would get upset. So we sometimes imagine fake victories and victim-hood against British out of air when we talk about partition and freedom struggle. Just as Pakistanis see every event as conspiracy by USA, Hindus and Jews. We sleep with our enemies in bedroom and blame a passer by.  British did not want to build a secretariat at birthplace of Rama in Ayodhya. They didn't want to make every Indian woman sleep with white man to change them to British. They didn't want to kill everyone who doesn't change himself into British and burns all the Sanskrit and choti. All these things happened in Kashmir, Pakistan and Bangladesh.

British ruled 24% of the land of the world before WWII and they had at stake trade, war debts, communist Soviet Union, rebuilding economy.
British slowly, and orderly vacated almost 3 dozen countries within 2-3 years.
British were not going to stay in Indian villages and towns, they didn't build their houses and church.
Their stake in India when they were leaving was limited, as it was in other parts of their empire.
And we forget that they defeated Hitler, Japan and similar important powers.

Common Indian is illiterate and has little knowledge about world than what he gets from WhatsApp and Facebook posts drafted by equally illiterate brothers.
There used to be a beggar in front of my school, he abused everybody because nobody paid him attention. I guess he took it seriously.

It is nuisance and preposterous to think that British would take Indians so seriously when they were leaving India. It is insanity and an exercise to boost our own assessment of our self worth. If check out History lessons in British schools, there is only very tiny place in it about India, they were not obsessed with Indians when they were leaving, as we would like to imagine, and we imagine just because we don't have anything else to talk or to show.

I don't know about any Indian contribution in modern technology in any field like physics, nuclear science, mathematics, engineering or anything of worth we contributed to modern sciences during last 500 years. British are gone for 70 years. I just recall that Hughes dock in Mumbai was Built by British more than 300 years ago, and in 21st century our new New dock for aircraft carrier in Mumbai is also engineered by a Dutch company. Most of the Engineering for Indian Navy Seabird project in Karwar is being done by Dutch companies. Most of important parts of our so called in-house fighter planes, we import from abroad. Same is true for every equipment or worth in our Naval ships. British left Hongkong in much better shape after 50 years in 1997, while Mumbai remains a ghetto agglomeration.  In British time cargo ships could come all the way to Kolkata, which was a big port city. Even though they didn't respect Indians, and like everyone else in the world they were selfish. But they did lot more for Indians by setting up institutions which enable us to function as democracy today and which we corrupted to the core. We produced leaders who were worse than British as far as sum total of Indian interests concerned, and read between the lines British knew us better than we knew, they foresaw the anarchy.

Unlike us who form our opinion just on emotion out of cloud, they studied everything methodically, including our psychology and our culture, they corrupted it when they needed. We are not capable of doing that with any other nation, even if it was wrong, they could do it.  Even today USA and UK have schools and departments which study different countries of the world, people and their psychology, that forms one of the major inputs for their foreign policy decisions. We Indians undermine everything we can, including study of our own history as if we were wannabe Arab or Mughals, I guess our diplomats (not trusting Kanhaiya Kumar types in our universities) take services of or follow material produced by experts in American universities. British deciphered Prakrit and Moryan edicts, unearthed Harappa, Mohanjodaro, Stupas, ruins of Nalanda and Vikramshila. British launched the great Survey of India in 1802, 50 years before laying railway lines, they created the maps, created record of soil, flora and fauna, found out height of Mt Everest. Almost all of the ground work for setting up democratic system in India was done by British from scratch. Constituent assembly was formed under British Guidance in 1946, before that Imperial Legislative Council and other structures existed at provincial and national level (reference: Government of India Act 1919 and 1935).  A major part of our constitution was copy cat of British and other constitutions. While we are still busy deciding whether it was Dr Ambedkar (he had studied constitution of many countries, but..) or Brahmin leaders and secretaries in the Drafting Committee who founded it from nowhere, like IIT professors who write engineering books by copying contents from different fundamental books published abroad, but are considered new Isaac Newton. Many of our acts predate to British India. It is madness to think that British were very upset and jealous after leaving India.

I am not denying intent of Macauley. All I am telling is our ancestors were willing accomplishes of Macauley and now that British are gone and we are accomplishes of those who think Arabs and Mughals gave us civilization and we are Mughals, our culture is eating protein rich Kebab, Beef biryani and marrying our sisters to Mughal blood men to express our gratitude.


Just to remind Indians, that almost all of the royalties in India, like Scindhias or Sikh maharajas after Ranjit singh were proud servants of British. Princes of Rajasthan lined up to do the services in insignificant positions in British army.  Never heard which Rajput prince turned the battle against Nazis in Normandy or against Japanese in Singapore, or helped British intelligence services with some breakthrough or were part of planning team of Churchill. Many of our glorified Rajput princes were probably unprofessional to be even officer in British Army, I guess they needed food cooked by a high caste Hindu. For many others understanding of English and studies in London was their sole achievement. Before British came most of the Rajput Royalty licked Mughals. 

These wars were fought on the base of technology, better fighter planes, war ships, tanks, communication and surveillance equipment, all about which we were completely ignorant. We Indians didn't know how to build a sewing needle on our own. We were proud just by providing manpower which could pull trigger of British machine guns (it would have impressed our untouchables castes back in village, who never saw a machine gun), and we even like to feel that they won battles because we fought. British just wanted recruits, they saw a Rajput prince (motivation for others to recruit) as they saw a Gorkha from remote village from Nepal or many other subjects of British empire across the globe they might have hired. Perhaps they always liked Gurkha much more because they might have much less attitude and were better in the field.

During second world war most of Indians fought on eastern front, with Japan. 40 thousand Indian soldiers surrendered in Singapore alone. We dont have any account of Japanese surrendering to British Indian army. Because Japanese soldier in 95% cases die in battle rather than surrendering. So Japanese considered Indians as characterless mercenaries. Who fought for British empire, and cowards who surrendered. Indian soldier prisoners were treated with disrespect by Japanese soldiers. Those included Hindu, Muslim, Sikh all. I don't know what percentage of them were Rajput Royalties, most foolish and bragging lot of them. 

Similarly, Germans found a way of dealing with captured British Indian soldiers, they offered them with a choice of fighting for them (for them it made sense, If we can fight for British, we can fight for German). So a big part of captured Indian soldiers fought for Germans. 

I had a batchmate from Jaipur, he claimed his great grandmother was grand child of Sawai Madho Singh. He claimed his great grandfather would twist British Indian coin with fingers, and they swung swords of 20 kg plus, spear of 60 kg. I consider all that to be fiction. Like the story of Prithvi Raj Chauhan killing Ghori even after being blinded. These are silly stories. Represents mental state of the narrator. 

Few Indians like Bhagat Singh and Subhash Chandra Bose fought for independence. Most educated Indians who can think, saw British to be God whom we can never match. Our educated Bengali middle class were mostly were wannabe British. Now since we cant do even honest soul searching, we fill up books as if we were all born in families freedom fighters (a lot of freedom fighter pensioners were petty people who disobeyed the existing law in British India and served jails etc., but their acts had no connection with freedom struggle).

I read in a book about India China war:

The setting mocked the headlines. India did not qualify for modern warfare. ‘She, whose only peer was the Holy Roman Empire, she shall rank with Guatemala and Belgium perhaps!’

The news grew worse. There were rumours of Gurkhas sent up to Ladakh armed only with their
knives, and of men flown from the Assam plains to the mountains of NEFA clad only in singlets and tennis-shoes.

But from the politicians there came only speeches, and from the administrator correct regulations. The
famous Fourth Division was cut to pieces; the humiliation of the Indian Army, India’s especial pride, was complete.


If this was the condition after 15 years of independence, then indeed all those 15 years, and years before, were just sleeping and making big mouthing, without action on the ground. Petty countries like Israel with 6 lakh population fought better war with Arab neighbors in 1948. 

Attachment VS Naipaul: India Woulnded Civilization


I was reading somewhere that India alone had more than 4000 Rolls Royce. 
With some of the princes owning 30-40 cars. 

Those princes they studied in London. Had their own cook, chauffeur. 
What do we know about their achievements in science, philosophy, arts? 

High people rode Rolls Royce, big landlords who couldn't afford that, their status was measured by the number of elephants and horses in the stable. 
Each elephant ate produce of 12 bighas of land, mostly sugarcane. On that land poor 100 people can survive.  

They did what was expected from them, what society rewarded. 
Our society did not know science and reason, and had no value for it. 
Still it is same for most people. 

People didn't expect them to do anything like improving governance, building canals etc.
World had changed, syllabus had changed, but people kept expecting same from their rulers: "bhikh".

Even in personal values the syllabus has changed, even if sprit may remain same in many aspects. 
Now Rama and Sita doesn't have to go through the same things,  he/she has to answer a different question paper.

People in one circle might have been lobbying to become the favorite of the ruler. 
These favorites might have been the cause of jealousy among other courtesans, who would have formed different power circles. 

Big landlords would have sought favor of these courtesans, and 
a tiller and worker at the bottom would take landlord as his Mai Baap. 
Where is the place for responsibility or delivery in this cycle? Those were voluntary. 
It can't breed anything other than sycophancy. 

Thursday, January 23, 2020

Problem in Achieving Peace in Middle-East

Terrorists are just manifestation of political road-map laid by Quran, Hadith, Sunnah. Which makes it amply clear that anyone who doesn't follow this book has to be intimidated and eliminated.

As long as liberal world  choose not to critically analyze and not show will to fight root cause, terrorism will continue, despite all the peace prayers  which are more a matter of convenience, a need to save oneself from facing the reality.

Muslims willing or  unwilling don't want to rectify their thought process and holy books, which need to be amended in order to provide equal treatment to all Human beings by Islam. If they do then it will not be Islam.

Problems of middle east:

We often hear only Islamic narrative of things, peddled by media. Any rational debate on subject must involve Israeli counterpart as well, but that doesn't happen. 

(1) When Muslims block anyone from entering Mekkah or Madina, miles away. Why don't they respect right of Jews and Christians to their religious sites like Jerusalem, Bathleham, which are not that important to Muslims? Jews and Christians did not leave the places just in peace, they were forced by Arab Muslims. Can one imagine how Muslims will react if Israel today occupies Mekkah?

(2) When all of Arab countries evacuated all Jews in total 1 million or more between 1948 and 1970, killed thousands of Christians which were very predominant in Arab in time of prophet also, why don't they accept Israeli hegemony in Israel? Don't they have right to 20,000 square kilometers?

(3) If Arabs wanted they could have accommodated Palestinians or developed Gaza but they don't. Israel is one thousand times smaller land compared to land area of Muslim countries. Why does it make such ego problem to all Muslim countries of the world?

(4) Arab countries have 70% of worlds oil Resources, The amount they spend on promoting Jihad against Jews, If they spend 10% of that on people of Gaza, life will be very good and they may not insist on jihad and killing, but Arabs are not saddened by plight of Gaza but they are saddened by existence of Jews.

(4) Should Israel lay arm and get killed in their rocket attacks? get their women raped and kids butchered? Don't they have right to self defense and existence? All attacks they do are necessitated by self defense.

(5) This pattern reflects every where, they eliminated every single hindu, Buddhis, Sikh, Jain religious site in Indian continent.

(6) Why do Palestinians provide shield to Hamas launching sites  despite warning from Israeli that they will be firing a particular launching site?

(7) Why do they don't ask Hamas  to make peace and stop attacking Israel? Why  Hamas insists on eliminating Jews?

(8) Suppose Arabs succeed in killing every Jew in Israel, will Jew hatred will stop? No never, It predates creation of Israel, Koran is full of Versus with Jew Hatred. It started in Madina in 6 AD. Only thing will happen is that Muslims will find another excuse. Reminds me of riots in India, always they say Quran was desecrated. Nobody gives a shit to Quran still.

(9) Palestinian Arabs are not from ancient Palestine but from Arab root. 



No prophet or Koran can encroach on our right to believe the way we want. 

One YouTube video, one Israeli guy says "Gandhi was not Jewish......to tell the truth, if Gandhi had laid himself in front of an Arab tank, instead of a British tank, you know the only thing would have been left was his lion-cloth. "

He was right, only thing that was left to Hindus in Pakistan, Bangladesh, Kashmir was lion-cloth. They didn't care for Gandhi. 

This green shade is amount of land Muslims have. And they claim they are fighting against Israeli occupation. They have occupied holiest of Jewish religious site, Temple Mount and built mosque over there. And Muslims claim they are fighting for justice. 


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hamas had made a base in this building below, destroyed by IDF on 15 May, during 2021 war....Al Jazeera, Associate Press and other news agencies had chosen to be their Human Shield! How can we expect media to be impartial? Several thousands of media outlets use AP material directly


Read this article to understand how Associated Press reports on Israel. It’s  a long article but very detailed first person account.

"To make sense of most international journalism from Israel, it is important first to understand that the news tells us far less about Israel than about the people writing the news."

"In these circles, in my experience, a distaste for Israel has come to be something between an acceptable prejudice and a prerequisite for entry. "

"The AP staff in Gaza City would witness a rocket launch right beside their office, endangering reporters and other civilians nearby—and the AP wouldn’t report it, not even in AP articles about Israeli claims that Hamas was launching rockets from residential areas."

"Cameramen waiting outside Shifa Hospital in Gaza City would film the arrival of civilian casualties and then, at a signal from an official, turn off their cameras when wounded and dead fighters came in, helping Hamas maintain the illusion that only civilians were dying."

"The current spokesman at the UN agency for Palestinian refugees in Gaza, for example, is a former BBC man. A Palestinian woman who participated in protests against Israel and tweeted furiously about Israel a few years ago served at the same time as a spokesperson for a UN office."

"..........with Yazidis, Christians, and Kurds falling back before the forces of radical Islam not far away from here, this ideology’s local franchise launched its latest war against the last thriving minority in the Middle East."
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Schools: Google it, “ UNRWA CONDEMNS PLACEMENT OF ROCKETS, FOR A SECOND TIME, IN ONE OF ITS SCHOOLS”



Hamas put rockets inside US run schools. Media never shows it. 

Human shield strategy: How to use children to fight? The teaching to die for religion in the text book that teaching at school in order to take “Jerusalem”. This why they willing to use children in the frontline. here:



"Examples of content found in Palestinian school books include references to violence, martyrdom and terror,"

Media only shows Bombarding of buildings, not telling that it was Hamas rocket launching site, and that Israel gave them sufficient time to evacuate the building. Even cameramen often have very good amount of time to film well. 


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

16 May 2021: Slogans shouted by mobs in London: 'death to Jews'. 
Cars festooned with Palestinian flags are going through heavily Jewish neighborhoods of London with loudspeakers blaring, "F*ck the Jews. Fuck their mothers, Rape their daughters."

On 15th May 2021, a pro-Palestinian rally in Belgium shouts "Death to the Jews". 

Under these conditions Israel is only more legitimate, else they will have no place on the earth. 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Indian politicians never opened mouth for Hindus in Kashmir, Pakistan and Bangladesh. Nor for Yazidis, Kurds, Christians in the middle east. 
In 1999, in the fist sitting of Loksabha, first topic to be raised was topic of Israel Palestine, by Communists. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
While  Israel confers honorary Israeli citizenship on Soumya Santhosh, Indian national killed in Hamas firing from Gaza. Kerala CM did not even name Hamas, rocket, Palestine. No elected representatives from Kerala even visited her family. Political parties spoke on Palestine but not on her. 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
While  A Pakistani member of Parliament was giving anti Jewish speech, quoting and praising Hitler. And all the other members of Parliament clapped. 

A rally in UK

How convenient it is, that so called liberals say 99 days that terrorism has no religion and that one day when Israel retaliates, Muslims say Jews are terrorist and so called liberals stay silent. 

Tuesday, January 14, 2020

Who was friend of British, Savarkar or Gandhi/Congress?

No indian politician had as many close friends among British as Gnadhi and second would be Nehru.

Gandhi helped British during Boer wars.


Gandhi (fifth from left, middle row) with members of the Indian ambulance corps during second Boer war.

Gandhi supported British Empire during first world war, gave call to Indian youth to enrol in British Army.

Savarkar served harsh imprisonment in Andman, where as Gandhi and Nehru were jailed to guest house type prisons.

Gandhi never took such acts which Savarkar did, so Gnadhi was in permanent agreement with Brits, like most people.

H G Wells writes that British mostly found Gandhi to be very useful person, who would not let events go violent and out of control.




Congress Party

Congress party was founded by a British Civil Servant Allan Octavian Hume, with the aim to create a platform for dialogue between Indians and British. The 4th, 5th, 10th, 20th, 26th, and 33rd president of Congress were British. Congress did not demand Indian independence till end of World War I. Congress cooperated with British governments, and their demands were usually limited to more rights like representation in British parliament, granting British citizenship to all Indians etc. 

Can we say Congress was playing fiddle of British? 

In 1946, Nehru accepted to work in Viceroys council as a minister, then he took oath of loyalty in the name of King George VI, calling him emperor of India.  Savarkar never took oath of loyalty to British. 

Even today so called liberal politicians, routinely invoke foreign powers, write to American Congress to intervene in internal matters of India, to defeat BJP. Did not Jaichand and Man Singh do the same? 
60 MPs signed the letter to Barack Obama, asking him to deny visa to Modi Ji when he was chief minister. 


Iqbal wrote couplets in the praise of Queen Victoria.  Will Congress blame Iqbal? Most of the freedom fighters were Hindu and Sikh, barring some exceptions. Muslim League worked and cooperated with British system. Have you known about any Movement of Muslims League against British? After Independence Pakistan was became full fledged ally of UK and USA, partner of NATO. Almost all Muslims voted for creation of Pakistan in 1946. RSS, Savarkar opposed partition, Congress accepted partition. But Congress and Indian leftists are busy spreading rumors about Savarkar and RSS, claiming Muslims to be patriot. Owaisi Razakars worked with British, Jinnah, those Muslims who signed Shimla agreement worked with British, not Savarkar. 



Leftists had signed mercy petition for Afjal Guru, slogans were shouted in JNU "Kitne Afjal maroge Har ghar se Afjal nilega.." But they have courage to raise fingers at Savarkar. 

Nizam of Hyderabad was an staunch supporter of British during 1857 rebellion, which won him a lot of British favor, which continued till pre 1947. All Nizams of Hyderabad remained pro British. These guns were specially prepared for him by British companies. 



_______________________________________________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Even Peiyar went against Gandhi and Congress. Was Periyar terrorist? Ambedkar and many other eminent Dalit thinkers including Kanshi Ram thought that "राजनितिक परिवर्तन से पहले सामाजिक और आर्थिक परिवर्तन जरुरी है, अंग्रेजो को निकलने से पहले हमें समाज व्यवस्था और अर्थ व्यवस्था को सुधारना चाहिए "


 "There is something called strategy to come out of prison. How can it be termed as surrender or mercy?" ‘Does he (Rahul Gandhi) have stature to talk about Savarkar?’. 
_______________________________________________________________________________________________

Gandhi asked Hindus in Muslim majority areas to give up their life, so that it will bring peace, it will change the heart of neighbors. 
Gandhi made similar request to Jews that they should walk to gas chambers themselves. 
Gandhi was not behaving like a responsible politician. Gandhi was an irresponsible person. 
A person who is asking a community to surrender itself to mass slaughter, is not speaking from a position of responsibility at the very least. 
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
How many times Rahul Gandhi, Kejriwal, etc have apologized in court? 

Mahatma Gandhi, Sardar Patel and Bal Gangadhar Tilak petitioned the government for his release. It is true that towards the end of his term in the Andamans, he requested the British to grant him amnesty.

In 1924, Savarkar was such a threat to British even after 14 year of rigorous imprisonment, that they kept him confined in Ratnagiri for 13 more years. But the same British allowed Nehru-Gandhi to move freely across India, even facilitating their travel to UK. Even the British knew who was a threat & who were sepoys. British kept Savarkar in detention for 27 years because they knew his ideas posed the sharpest threat to their rule. British stand vindicated today as the ideological roots he laid even under imprisonment have grown for a 100 years into the Hindutva movement ruling India today. But British let Nehru & Gandhi roam freely around the nation as they knew they were pets on a leash that could be pulled back anytime. Not just India, they even travelled to UK. Only freedom fighters in human history to travel to the occupier nation under their full protection. 


they say savarkar mafi ...
how many times rahul gandhi has asked maafi request in court to RSS
rahul gandhi and kejriwal both