देश लूटता रहा, हम सब अपने ही देश को लूटते रहे और इल्जाम हमेशा औरो पर लगाया
Fear due to lack of unity should not be sugarcoated as tolerance.
India may go peaceful, may become developed but until we cure this disease, India will again collapse. We have been hobbling between good times and collapse for 1400 years. Even if we were doing well, we still should have addressed this problem.
Root cause of problems of India is not Muslim invaders or British, It is Hindus. Any foreign hand will always find enough hands and brain to do anything for them. Foreign hand changes time to time, Muslim, British, Congress.
Often I see Indians telling Indians or foreigners, how proud they are of their culture, how much it shapes their daily life, character. This is something unbearable for me, having seen all sorts of attrition. Hindus are more materialistic than any other community, but they always pretend otherwise.
One cannot find more than handful of Muslim in Indian continent who will act as a sycophant to appease a Hindu. But in-spite of historical events, present realities, you can always turn up most of Hindu individuals against Hindus.
Hindu are liberal and sane in religious views, but that is not the complete picture.
Three types of people constitute silent spectators on the site of a murder: an ultra-liberal, complicit and a coward. But it is difficult to distinguish among these three as they all pretend to be liberal.
Can you find a more than handful of Bureaucrats, or Govt officials who are willing to give up on a chance to earn bribe? Go to a police station in India, you will die of uttering request to behave and register FIR, but they wont register FIR unless you pay some bribe, they wont behave if you are a poor. Very same people, wont misbehave when 5-6 Muslim boys come to file FIR.
http://blogs.economictimes.indiatimes.com/headon/indian-asphyxiation-service-ias/
I haven't slaughtered a mouse, but suppose my neighbours attack my brother, my family. Few times I will cry, feel helpless but after a while when crying doesn't work, i will go to police, if that also doesnot work, i will myself make spears, buy gun. However if I dont love my family, I wont ever react. I will be liberal, which Hindu are.
How come these people become liberal, when the house of neighbour is attacked, when Hindus are raped and massacred in some other part? They simply don't care. If you call it liberalism, then you are misleading yourself as it happens in most of cases.
Cast system in present India is equally convenient moral dishonesty. A Jat or Rajput boy will most often brag about his cast, pretend bravery. A Brahman will most of time claim some other honour. Everyone wants to grab whatever stature they can grab for free. But that bravery doesn't go beyond that. I have found most often Rajput and high cast Hindus or Yadavs who are firmly united to beat a Dalit, they don't even attempt to resist a Muslim assault, they don't want to risk themselves. They don't care simply, as long as there is fun, they participate together. Moment there is time for payback, they show their true colour. Reddies of Andhra, Vokaligga, Lingayats everywhere there are cast lobbies, and basis of cast lobby is not the cast system, it is just a tool to get a share in loot, just like employee associations.
Try to grab one inch of land from your neighbour, they will show you what they can do. Same people didn't whisper when country was partitioned. Brahmans who form 50% of judges in court, majority in media, and elite clubs. They will be ever ready to show their liberalism, for Muslims, they didn't whisper when entire Kashmiri Pandit population was uprooted within 24 hrs, women abducted, child butchered. They were busy proving these are act of rebellion, act of few Muslims who have misunderstood Islam (as if they know more about Islam than Muslims). Even more than that if they have had done right thing, Kashmiri pundits wouldn't have been with them in their fight for legitimate demands. Kashmiri Pandits didn't put united voice, their educated leaders in Delhi Chandigarh, London, Newyork gather to party but not to put a face (baring exception).
How many Yadavs have courage to stand for Krishna Janmbhumi temple in Mathura? To stand against Aurangjeb names across the country? To stand against Mahmud? How many Hindu Rajputs and other Kshatriyas have courage to stand for Ram temple against Muslims? Ram was Survanshi Kshatriya. How many Rajputs will stand against Akbars history of forcing Rajputs to send their daughters and sisters (in lieu of not plundering and setting ablaze their territories and not forcing jaziya on them)? Akabar had princesses of 36 Rajput kings of Rajasthan in his harem. A Hindu Rajput feels very glorious of Maharana Pratap, as long as it doesn't hurt Muslims and they don't dare to express it in front of Muslims. Rajput when they are faced with Rajput Muslims of UP or Punjab(Pakistan) or Pathans(most Pathan Muslims are High caste Hindu converts), they feel very proud of them, their bravery in raping Hindus. They do psycho fancy. Jat Hindus and Sikhs are very proud of Muslim Jats in Punjab. Lahore, capital of Sikh empire, Nankana Sahib, Punja Sahib, their factories in Lahore, their bowls of wheat in irrigated doabs of Montgomery and Layalpur. Estimated 23000 women were abducted in Punjab during partition, almost entire Sikh population faced danger from Muslims, half of them were saved because Punjab was divided and half migrated from Pakistan, with most migrant families loosing some member. Sympathisers of Kahlistan, wealthy Sikhs of UK and Canada don't have courage to speak a word on Pakistan, or for the matter Kashmir where Sikhs were also massacred along with Hindus by Muslims after 1990.
No caste is exception, just it is a matter of chance. Some statistics: 52% Jat are Muslim in Indian continent (mostly in Pakistan), 48% Rajput are Muslim ( 2/3rd in India).
In areas which are now Pakistan, contrary to common belief , the conversion of upper caste took place first, then it was followed by lower caste of the hierarchical society. It is on records that Thakurs of Sindh converted to Islam in order to save their fiefs. This happened with in first hundred years of conquest. The same phenomena was repeated when Punjab was conquered later on. Here Rajputs converted first. The conversion of lower caste was carried out by these indigenous upper caste converts subsequently so as to ensure loyalty of the subjects but most importantly to hide the shame of conversion from the eyes of the masses.
Another very shocking example, is of Bengali Hindu middle class. I wont talk about low class, hungry cant be expected to have wisdom. Bengali Brahmins, or Bengali Hindu middle class considers itself most superior in India in terms of intellect. Bengali Hindu elite control media, JNU, secular and communist think tanks, Literature space. I didn't find many Hindu Bengali who are ashamed of mistreating Bihari working class in Kolkata. But they stitch their lips when Bangladeshi Muslim intruders burn villages of Hindu poor class. Most of Bengali Hindu elite came from Bangladesh after genocide by Muslim Bengalis. Most of them migrated in 1945-47, 1965-1972. Just two generations have passed. None of them remember it. Most of Bengali authors in English make a career by justifying Pakistan, Bangladesh, Hindu hatred, so called secularism. Their NRI lobby in USA, UK and elsewhere? Bengal govt following footsteps guided by Nobel laureate Dr. Amratya Sen, provides salaries to imams of mosques, how proud does it make Bengali elites.
Recently I met an asshole Hindu who has converted to Christianity and is doing PhD at Delft university. He was very ardent fan of Raj Thakre and his Maratha pride even after conversion. He insisted on rightness of his methods to cut down on poors from North India who work in Mumbai. I wondered where is his hero hiding when AIMIM is openly raping Mumbai now? Where is his hero hiding when Muslim mob of 50,000 burned the war memorial after Muslim Buddhist clashes in Myanmar? I wonder these people dont respect their fellow Indians, Biharis, Bhaiyas from UP and they talk against Geert Wilders in Nederlands, they want justice and equal respect from Americans and British. Matter of fact is that guy like most of Indians, just wash their hands in flowing Ganges, these talks are good time-pass as long as it hurts only others, they wont time-pass about Muslims they know they will be screwed in broad day light.
One one hand high cast Hindu want abolition of cast reservation to low castes, on other hand they want to get a share in reservation pie too. Barring few exceptions can you find some high cast person who is honest enough to say that despite reservation we get more than twice share in jobs compared to our population. Is it not true that High Caste have 40% share in Govt jobs, way more than their population which is less than 20%? Is not it true that they lack in intellectual capacity to full the positions reserved for them because of historical place they had in Hindu society last 1000 years at least? Do you find more than handful of people from High cast who say whatever disparities and injustice they did to low castes was wrong? They will say there was no injustice, it is fiction. So you don't want to accept your wrongs done to your own Hindu clan, you don't have slightest remorse, how can you be sane and expect Muslims to accept their atrocities? Magnitude differs but problem remains same. I have found many Hindu groups coming up with some alibi. Is it too hard to say, this was a mistake? There is demand for reservation based on financial condition. Because they know it is very easy for low income high castes to grab the jobs, which low castes cant do. Reasons are as simple as: a Japan can build country in 20 years after Nagashaki incident but a India cant build in 20 years after independence from British, India hasn't built in 67 years. Everything is not accounted in material. Suppose, I dont have any money, I can still make much more because of my education even if I have nothing, I cant expect same from a mushar in Bihar village, simply his ancestors were not educated and education and wisdom didn't pass to him. Have they ever protested against job reservation for Urdu teachers, Urdu translators? Haj Subsidies? Govt funding to Madarsas?
Low castes, they have no desire to stand on their feet and genuinely earn the positions which they want. Don't the low castes use historic injustices to justify their greed to shortcut? Is it not true that they want this reservation system to continue perpetually so that they don't have to compete? Is it not true that a Paswan or Dhobi doesn't marry into Chamar family and a Chamar doesn't marry into Mushhar family? Even educated low castes who were in good financial condition for two generations, they don't agree to exclude themselves from reservation. Many of low cast have converted to Christianity to get the freebies. Many converted to Buddhism, however I did not find a single word of protest when Muslims desecrated Budhdhas sautes in Ambedkar park in Lucknow. Mayawati was so adamant on building a grand park, where was she gone? Where were other gone who were telling these parks are waste of money while they silently agree to a Lion share of Indian budget going to Kashmir. They dont protest against Govt taking control of temple funds. Its a loot, we don't care for the property which we aim to loot. Any money outside once family is ok to be looted.
If a Hindu beats low cast, media will show, low caste leader, people will protest. If Muslims desecrate a temple of Ravidas, or a church or a temple of Budha worshipped by low castes, low castes themselves conveniently consider it acceptable, they will say Muslims are taught that they have been like that what to do, let us move on.
जो गोत्र मे शादी कर ले इंसान, उसे जाती से निकल देते हैं, उसकी हत्या तक कर देते हैं. पर जो देश का सौदा कर आए, ISI से पैसे खाए पत्रकार, नेता, अफ़सर. उसका सम्मान करते हैं, उसे अपनी बेटी देते हैं.
अगर मद्रास का हिंदू पंजाब के हिंदू के साथ खड़ा होता तो किसी की पाकिस्तान बनाने की हिम्मत ना होती. अगर भारत के हिंदू कश्मीरी पंडिटो के साथ खड़े होते तो किसी की हिम्मत ना होती की पंडित को छु के देखे.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KVJ2evFHX5A
Coward can never find any place, he keeps running away, from Kabul to Lahore to Kashmir to Jammu. Wherever he goes, he becomes unsafe after few years.
My understanding and experience says a wise man of character can shake the world, he is more powerful than many butchers. Fact is we didn't have that character and wisdom, else we wont produce traitors in every house who for the sake of career and money become shameless hypocrites.
Politicians and social activists who get money for their NGOs in the name of social activism and justice to low castes, they all keep money and have made it a business. Name a single low caste politician who has gone beyond business of vote bank.
A word about communist parties and people, they are more concerned about Palestine 5000 miles away than 50 miles away Bangladeshi Hindus, neither about Kashmir. They don't mourn partition, they don't mourn massive forced emigration of half million Kashmir Hindus, they don't mourn thousand of temples in Kashmir which were burned, but they mourn Babri demolition every year. They supported creation of Pakistan in 1946, for Chinese attack in 1962. they participated in direct action day rally by Muslim League in 1946. But so called communists are pride of Bengali Hindu intellect. Nowhere in the world you will find a communist party lobbying for a religion and behaving like a Islamic party. Dravidian parties of Tamilnadu, socialist parties, regional parties of Telangana and elsewhere they all licked Muslims, never focused on development, made big fortunes. But in all these cases passions were created in name of some justice, some reason. People knowingly indulged.
Can we assume that an educated person in Mumbai, Delhi, Kolkata, votes out of ignorance? No, they vote knowing everything to fulfil some immediate greed for themselves, their family, which often come in form of dividends for a particular cast, group or affiliations. They knowingly chose to burn in hell rest of population so that they get little more preference. When their interests cross with interests of Muslims they submit without a fight, because they had no moral conviction in their actions or thoughts ever, everything was show off, how one can expect them to stand up.
Those who live among enemies they know they are insecure but those who live with dishonest neighbors they are most insecure.
Let us talk about Army. During Kargil war, many staff who were called on duty they committed suicide, took poison so that they don't have to fight. I know personally few people who worked in army. They were not special or honest. They worked for salary, for job. If they get a choice that they will get double salary and more facilities most of them will quit army. Only difference from Muslims is Muslims will deceive army without any reason, but a Hindu will do it after taking very heavy bribe. So a Hindu wont do it normally. And after some member of family gets killed in some operation in Pakistan border, or Kashmir its very convenient to tell my family member was a great patriot, and next moment you fight for getting gas agency, petrol pump from Govt. I exclude people and families who have patriotism but I can say they are a minority.
Everyone knows about budging Indian authors, historians, intellectuals from JNU, and how they create passions for Maoists and jihadis. A young student of Journalism learns first how their seniors predecessors made fortunes. An aspirant of civil services from Bihar and UP works very hard, because he knows once he is selected he can earn thousand times more illegal salary than a normal job, he can earn so and so amount from flood relief package and such amount from food subsidy system (meant for Below Poverty Line people). Govt staff just look for opportunity to strike so that they don't have to work. They want their salaries to double every year but they should not have to work, most of them are absent from their duties in rural areas, whenever they get chance. I had a Hindu batch-mate during bachelor whose ancestors had migrated from Lahore in 1947, they came with only clothes on their body, but they made fortunes when some family member became in-charge of rehabilitation supplies for immigrants. Many authors of Kashmir Hindu origin who fled valley in 1990s, have made a career by writing about Kashmir problem in a manner which benefits only Pakistan and Kashmiri Muslims. Read Rahul Pandita, Mahesh Bhatt, Aarti Tikku Singh, Anjana Kashyap or many of them.
Peaceful and tolerant or insensitive to problems of group? Later is true. Thinking men talk about non-violence/humanity to avoid mutual destruction, kind men talk out of innocence, cunning talk about Humanity to fool others. Hindus keep fooling every other Hindu.
There was no shame ever since they used to pass they keys of forts to invading Muslims for personal favors. Have you read about Kalyani, the diwan of Rohtas? He conspired with Sher Shah Shuri to hand over Rohtas fort, in lieu Tons of golds he received, which he planned to give to his widowed daughter Kalyani. Kalyani refuses it. But in most cases people didn't refuse it even those days.
If Osama Bin Laden were to fight an election from Mumbai or Delhi, media would have found hundred qualities in him, just for small money or even free, just to be in good eyes of Laden, get favours and maintain their track record for future clients. Some Hindu castes, would have found many virtues in him after promise of freebies and giving them more power against the other castes whom they are jealous of. All Hindu castes have done it. In all parts of India. Didn't certain castes vote for a Govt in UP which ordered open fire on Karsevaks? Didn't their vote percentage increase after that?
Hindus are not able to protect Hindus in Kashmir, Srilanka, Bangladesh and they feel they should be superpower, UNSC permanent member. They will share biryani with Pakistanis and Indian Jihadis, while USA will protect them and fight terrorism. Nobody cares about terrorism as long as chances of his own house getting caught in flames is very low.
My relatives in Bihar, so religious and I would say more honest than most of Indian families. I have 40 cousins around in my extended family. I asked few of them to come to RSS sakha, or to read some patriotic literature which I would give them free. None of them or their parents agreed. But they all spend so much time in puja and most of them have a room reserved for multiple of Gods. My own parents were too much concerned about me wasting money on books, and Hindu activities. I always questioned their blind faith and reason for wasting money on Gods, stones, pilgrimages? They had no answers, answer is they are selfish. They fear God would destroy their happiness, they want a good future.
Hindu talk often about family values and love. Most Hindu Girl/ boy will talk about virtues of arrange marriage until they find a better bargain in Love affair. And they stick to family mostly because they have no choice. I think not even 1% Hindu families would agree to a relation in which partner is not up to their bargain in financial condition and physical attraction, other qualities foot.
Most of Indians, Hindus find all the information about job, they show astute cunningness in day to day life, in all matters of life, investigate things excessively in financial matters. They gather relevant information somehow. I can say Indians are most competent in these things. Cant they see writing on the wall, don't they know what they are doing? Indian boy or Indian girls are more dishonest in pre-marital love affairs than in west, Indian girls just look on pocket.
Savarkar puts it in this way: "
ये हिन्दुस्थान का नक्शा जो हम बचपन से देखते आए हैं वो अब विच्छिन्न हो चुका है, दो टुकड़ो मे फाड़ दिया गया है, ये पाकिस्तान हिन्दुस्थान की छाति मे घुसा बान है, यह रज्य कौन सा है किसने इसे बनाया? मुसलमानो ने नही, इंग्लेंड ने नही, हिन्दुओ ने इसे बनाया है " (''This map of India which we were seeing since childhood has been torn away. this Govt of Pakistan is a arrow in the heart of Hindusthan, what is this Pakistan? Who created this Pakistan? Muslims didn't create it, British didn't create it. We have created it. Hindus have created it. '')
Hindus didn't chose Savarkar or Hindu Mahsabha, they chose Congress. How uncomfortable it would be to fight aggressors, and how comfortable it is to sacrifice Hindus of Pakistan, Bangladesh and those living in Muslim areas, you simply need to sit in home and feel glorious about your liberalism. If get abused by Muslims even after sacrificing, it will not matter you have no stake at all. After all they abuse Hindus, and not your family or you.
Hindus themselves are so dishonest and still some Hindus feel Muslims should have some self respect, they should acknowledge their Hindu ancestry. You are fully confident that your neighbour doesn't deserve respect of your attention but people of foreign mindset should respect you?
Shame?
Did Hindus ever have shame in last 1200 years? Don't try to hide yourself in scriptures and glories of the past. May be my great grandfather owned an elephant, so what?
Masochism is an alibi to save skin. Non-violence, Buddha, Gandhi all are evoked conveniently as a tool to justify what we do.
This is not a matter of cowardliness, liberalism or pacifism, this is a matter of moral dishonesty.
Generation after generation, parents, teachers, elders, friends, family, neighbors, all have passed this unwritten code. Everyone is complicit.
