Hindu Need More Rational Thinking

So far majority of Indians have welcomed technology but they have not adapted to reason and scientific way.  Reason is painful, it flings in the face of habits and ego. If we just be reasonable and honest with ourselves, India will be vibrant. Reason takes years to get acceptance. Europe saw renaissance 400 years ago, still they fought two world wars and made some of the biggest blunders. In 21st century majority of population in west doesn't know how to think. It is not part of curriculum anywhere. The best thing which every good willing human can do is to speak reason, pass the reason to others. Once somebody learns to reason he/she can solve most of the problems himself if not all.

India was golden bird because our ancestors were more reasonable than other tribes of the world, half reason brought luxury and dogma. We lost to Muslim invaders. First we must take both Vedas and science seriously. Then we must accept that Vedas and scriptures are not divine and doesn't contain all the knowledge, we must evolve in our culture. Only reason Hindu-Buddhist culture will survive longer (before it merges into single human identity as sought by sages) than Islam or Christianity is room for reason and adapting to new information. We adapted to Buddha, Kabir, ten Gurus of Punjab, Swami Vivekanand. We did not fix it to one person wisdom who lived ten thousand year ago, we evolved all the time. When we write motivation letter for job every next time we write it better and better, if we write once and don't revise then are doomed. If Europeans have been satisfied with lollypop of Bible, they would never have discovered the modern science. I am not comparing bible with Vedas, In-fact ancient Indians were very advanced in their understanding of human psychology which is origin of most human problems, but we must accept there is scope for improvement. Lollypop satisfaction can spoil the brightest student. If we had worked and questioned every smallest thing honestly in last 60 years, we would have been the best, we would have set example for entire world.

There is no limit to human achievement and en-devour, future will bring much better thinkers than we have seen, this is natural if one understands flow of  time and evolution works. We must accept that Bharat can become wishwa guru only if we produce people with best reasoning ability and character.

Predicting Future and Observations in Context of Indian Politics

1. Arabs are getting civilized. The quantum of educated and peaceful among arabs is much much higher than Indian Muslims. So even when Arabs settled outside, wont care about jihad, Arab supremacy. One day all this is going to end. 

Why Media is anti-Modi and anti-Hindu

Give money/power or lure to any(most) Hindu and he will take up agenda of Pakistan, Islam. But Modi is different. Anti Modi agenda is in essence anti-Hindu agenda, it is pro Muslim pro Pakistan agenda. They are not interested in silencing Narendra Modi, they are interested in silencing a leader who refuses to toe Pakistani and Muslim line. Journalists are indirectly (willingly or unwillingly) Pakistan and Muslim proxies. Most Hindus are ready to become proxy of Muslims. The anti-Hindu ecosystem offers huge financial benefits to journalists, politicians, TV. It is linked to corruption in govt and distribution of that money. Keep a chaos of guilt among Hindus and nobody asks for where the taxpayers money is gone, besides you get stringent support from Muslims of India and Pakistan. 

Even if you are not able to make into one of ISI paylist or Congress paylist still It doesn't cost to toe anti Modi line. Suppose you are journalist and you need to submit  articles frequently for two three journals, and as a professional your article must draw more readership than peer journalist. Writing news stories everyday can become monumental if you have no ideas. You are lazy also, don't want to tire yourself. Wont you look for an easy way ? Just imagine a anti-modi or anti-Hindu story and write in 2-3 hours (just like students copy assignments before deadline). Rest of time you can visit mall, chat with girlfriend etc. 

People of India like sensational stories more than rational stories.  
The easiest thing to write a sensational story is to imagine some Muslim victim hood, some imaginative Hindu communal-ism, some imagination on Modis walking style or his kurta etc. You have complete freedom to imagine and write. On other hand, producing  good content which can compete with sensation  is really hard work, few don't have capacity to create digestible content and most are just lazy. If someone writes it out of self inspiration still people don't read (How many of us read Niti Central News, Koenraad Elst or Sitaram Goyal compared to Arundhati Rai and pseudo spiritualist Deepak Chopra?). If you look into Bollybood Slumdog does more business. 

If you get ten euros for beating  a dog, then which dog u will like to beat, one who meekly accepts or one who will bite you back? Same reason follows for why everyone is anti-Hindu. Despite knowing that they can do it only with Hindus and Hindus are most liberal. You cant write anti-AK49 or anti Pappu without facts, because when you do that the others will take advantage of it and write against you.  You will be sued and everything. Even Hindu find self beating easier than standing up to Muslim bully. It earns false respect in eyes of bully (mentality of slave, they manage it by shouting on some poor maid or daily wage farm worker in rural).

Modi himself has sacrificed his image and body everything for humanity and humans, so he don't care about his image, you abuse him at his mouth, he will still be nonchalant. He wont give any favour even if journos write positively about  him. Hindu organizations have not learned art of getting and doing favours with media. And most Hindus  don't care for anything except food, party, branded shoes etc. 

So you can write anything and everything about Hindus. Nationalist Hindus will read in shock, normal people will read for sensation, Muslims will read to enjoy. You keep commenting on article, author will not change, because he has written to attract all of us to his page even if we abuse him. Public opinion means nothing to them,  money counts (for most of Indians also). One journo ridiculed a friend of him because the friend took his writings seriously. 

There is also ISI money, Whabi money from saudis, NGOs money, money from Christian missionaries, Congress money, Sharda scam money. All these funds go to key people in different organizations. But main inspiration comes from inside. It is omnipresent moral corruption among Hindus which is real cause.  And unless we address it, the monster will keep manifesting in different forms. Now I will explain how. 

Our home culture

Why is that traitor are only being born in Hindu families for 1100 years?
 ये ग़ददार 1100 साल से हिन्दुओं  के घर में ही क्यों पैदा हो रहे हैं ?

If we suffer from a cancer, and if we don't accept that we have cancer or don't agree for a surgery, we will die.

Daughter of my Punjabi senior looked like a model, maintaining a very high life standard, she did Journalism and Mass Communication from Kolkata, during conversation I found see has never seen countryside real India, she seemed to have no interest in problems of common people, she went London afterwards to pursue masters in mass communications. She must have spent 40-50 lakhs INR in total. How is she gong to recover that money? How can she continue maintain a high life standard on her own and buy a bungalow which likes of Rajdeep Sardesai, BBC and CNN journalists do?  Do you think with 30-50000 INR  per month you can do it? There are hundreds of journalism courses across india in which thousands of young guy and girls are enrolled every year, how are they going to survive in this cut-throat competition? How are they going to become next Shobhana Dey, Sagarika Ghose whose glamour and lifestyle inspired them to choose this career path? All means must be adopted. 

Journalism is just one face of internal rot. In my native place in Bihar, I have seen many many guys getting key Govt jobs by bribing huge amounts, and they all wanted to recover that money with interest and much more by taking more bribe. To get a PG place in one of the state Govt. medical colleges, many bribe a minister in crores. IAS, IPS, IES, forest officers who go on merit, they think when politicians and their merit-less subordinates can loot  then why not we, we are more qualified, we have worked really hard to achieve this position. And these IAS, IES are role models of youth in Bihar, UP etc. If you are on any post which can get you ten times black money than average salary, you will be offered an attractive girl from very good family and big dowry. If you are honest, you are just another fool disabled by your queer world view (they call it ***tiya), whom nobody wants to offer a cup of tea. Every father is behind his son from age of 3, by age of 8-9 he must start building his GK, so that he can compete with others in  UPSC and bring prestige to family. They are so convinced about sanctity of these ambitions (in their entirety with means to achieve it) that almost every parent  has some oath to take a pilgrimage or offer something to some deity. In bihar mother or father vow to start chhath wrat or nine day durga path on just water if their son/daughter gets some coveted post. 

You feel hunger before you learn to work, empathize. One thousand years of slavery has made beggar of everyone. Not all of us are capable, hard working and with high IQ. But all of us feel right to live happily, be powerful like the people we see on screen, other rich people in mohalla, society many of whom didn't posses any good virtue. Why someone should have quota in suffering just because he was born poor or in village. To fulfill these, a boy from village sees an opportunity in politics and learns to play cast game better and more cleverly than others who are already in the field. Some become contractor, sarpanch, anganbadi worker. Govt employees form union to get more share in pervasive loot or to cover their intentional non-performance. Cool dudes see a future in AAP and IT team of AK (And  these AAPtards are most creative and competitive lot, even Goebbels must be ashamed) . Everyone uses means they can get hold of. Most people don't feel even slightest of anguish before taking these steps, why care, which nation, whose nation! Everyone pretends to be moral until they get opportunity. People talk about corruption only until they are paying bribes and they talk aloud so you hear them, but when they come to the receiving side they  love it silently, so you dont hear them. It shapes your perception that most common man is against corruption.  

Moral corruption is everywhere, it is inside our houses.  They very first lesson about hypocrisy and double speak we learn from our mother and father then teachers (from their behaviour). We learn it from elder brothers whom we emulate. Hypocrisy and corruption has been institutionalised in Indian Hindu families so much that we don't even know when we lie. Individuals use ego and anger to hide from truth and to justify all means (Ego certainly remains one of the most overused feelings in the Indian continent). It is happening since last thousand year at least, when our Kings used to welcome Muslim invaders to teach a lesson to our neighbour King.  Such  upbringing can never produce a youth of character and courage.  

You can read this blog to understand the obvious and get more. 
http://danasurdanu.blogspot.nl/2...

A word about morality, morality has differet meaning for different people. Tigers morality is to feed his stomach and his cubs. Nobody cares about how chickens feel during slaughter, when there is hunger or mood for party. Once you get into habit of eating chickens, your hunger is more important.

We spend lot of time abusing Paki journalists, but they seem to me far better than us. At-least half of Paki journalists think about nation and Islamic imperialism. They speak what they think. They are clear in their goal. They are capable of sacrificing and thinking for what they consider fraternity.

We Hindus are so greedy that we are not able think outside our family of 5-6, but we are so coward that we speak something different when we talk to outside world and we believe in our false self image. Nothing fools you more than your own brain.

I agree with Gandhi on one comment, he said "There is no doubt in my mind that in the majority of quarrels the Hindus come out second best.  But my own experience confirms the opinion     that the Mussalman as a rule is a bully, and the Hindu as a rule is a   coward.  Need the Hindu blame the     Mussalman for his cowardice?  They say that in Saharanpur the Mussalmans looted houses, broke  open safes and, in one case, a Hindu woman's modesty was outraged.  I, as a Hindu, am more ashamed of Hindu cowardice than I am   angry at the Mussalman bullying.  Where were the  relatives of the outraged sister at the time of the outrage?  My non-violence does not admit of running away from danger and leaving dear ones unprotected. "

If  my great grandfather owned an elephant, that doesn't say anything about  me. Its time Hindus stop being just being nostalgic abut glories of the  past and start sweating afresh.  If we  do that, we will certainly get honest journalists,  politicians and bureaucracy.

Lack of interest in reason

Habit of reason doesn't build in one generation, reasoning is tricky thing, it takes generation after generation several generations. We have lost habit of it. 

One major revolution took place when one  human didn't run away from fire like people of his tribe, he thought differently, questioned it and then it is history how we cleared forests and melted metal. But none of humans before that day ever questioned it, you need to run away always on the sight of fire. 

If there is a flip in thinking of all of hundred members of group, none of them will ever know it.  If there is a group of hundred blind people none of them will ever know concept of light, all of us are blind to some extent. It affects Muslims much more than us. You cant see that your brain is misleading you, you can only see how someone else is being mislead and that someone also thinks he is perfect as you think about yourself. Our brain, our upbringing puts a  cage around us.  The moment we recognize monster in one face monster finds some different mask. Monster thrives on our inherent inability to reason. 

So far after independence we Hindus have shown very little appetite and demand for reason.

Nobody questions, how can you say that "Biharis are politically suave "and "voting percentage in Bihar is always between 50-55%" in same breath? Very  few people question why wife and son of Feroze Khan is Indira Gandhi not Indira  Khan, Rajiv Khan and what is their connection with M.K. Gandhi. Most think they are all family of M.K. Gandhi. You accept it or not but white skin and foreign origin is asset of Sonia, Pappu in rural, semi-literate and even among some literate people. One of my friends was boosting to an Italian that we also have  an Italian lady as de-facto supreme. But we say we are not racist. We do the worst, we do racism with ourselves, everything goes subconsciously in feelings (needs investigation why ?) without any application of reasoning anywhere. Here is a mass ready to accept everything if they can be fooled properly. Many find opportunity to shape our brain to further their interest.  Everything with proper advertisement will sell, so why not focus on only advertisement (Here is what inspires Kejriwal in what he does) . 

Another example away from politics, the way thousands gather to SatyaSai, and Nirmal Baba and go to graves of jihadi Moinuddin Chishti, Ghaji Salar, I find very distressing that people are always looking for magic to find solution to their problems. 

Hindu waited for 1200 years to get rid of slavery. We are always passive. We don't want to ask uncomfortable questions why? We have not learned to say ourselves, we dont know it and we will work on it, we can be wrong because of ..... We are always confident about our ignorant views.

For Hindus, it was just a change in govt, nothing of their business. Since 712,  All Muslim tribes kept coming, British came, it was all flutter-less (I don't believe in over hyped freedom movement, though there were  some selfless who died for ignorant masses), it happened but nothing was happening to their home, their dharam (piety) was intact (by not touching food from Muslims and not marrying with them, though a neighbour was forced to eat, he was removed from cast). Totally insidious, interested in petty local stuff, had no interest in nation. Feeling of nation didn't exist. No interest in what is happening outside. No eagerness to change, learn new things. No willingness to accept that others can also pose talent or can think some things better than them. Lost in their own mind, with their own false invented realities. Industrial revolution and Renaissance  is for them  something which happened by magic, as if no thought or work was involved. Superior military tactics of Muslim armies of central Asia was never researched by local kings. Even after loosing hundreds of battles, they learned nothing themselves, nothing from enemies. Have we learned now?

Nothing has changed because still the attitude is not questioned. 

V.S. Naipaul had a very good observation; Chapter 8: Renaissance or Continuity (India wounded civilization)

I will tell one more personal observation: I had some Jewish friends who happened to be connected to political Jewish lobby. A community hundred times smaller than Hindus, with approximately 200 nobels till date. Jews have documented each and every detail during their 4000 years of history, nothing is left to myths or chance, every small incident is documented with date, author everything. They didn't have a land, no patronizers, no future. They question each and every thing in their political move.   Their habit and attitudes have passed from generation to generation and each new generation kept adding. For us every time something is asked, we make zero effort to search truth, we come up with some easy convenient myth. We Hindus had everything, land, population, army, resources, but still it takes a British Henery Elliot (His book: History of India as told by its own historians is most authentic and referred book on Indian history till date), Canadian Tarek Fateh, a Belgian Koenraad Elst, a Trinidad born Naipaul to bring facts. If there is some smart person like Ambedkar or Savarkar we find hundreds of reasons to distance ourselves from their work. (Ambedkar, had some very good observations, but we chose to ignor him, because of his pro-Dalit stand, Savarkar a Brahmin, didn't get support of Maratha people in maharshtra, they supported Congress).

There is fine difference between ignorance and liberalism. A narrow minded person who is ignorant about country and has real attachment only to his ten bigha land in village, can very easily sacrifice his country and claim he is liberal. If you dont love your mother, leave her in village hut, but talk to friends in city about your background and how you struggled made achievements and your mother still lives in village hut (perhaps she lives there because she is burden to you and your wife and you dont want to bring her to city amid your posh friends), you can fancy yourself as a liberal forward looking but a sharp friend may question it.  Fake liberalism of many Hindus fancies some western tourists, ourselves but not to muslims. They juggle through it, tear it and use it (they will use in any case, but now they laugh behind you apart from using). 

So  far majority of Indians have welcomed technology, we like cell phone, car etc. but we have not  adapted to reason and scientific way to look at the problems. Most people are just spinning around by their own brain, due to their slippery grip on logic.  Reason is most painful, it flings in  the face of habits and ego. 

Reason takes years to get acceptance.  Europe saw renaissance 400 years ago, still they fought two world wars  and made some of the biggest blunders. In 21st century majority of  population in west doesn't know how to think, it has been limited to few who have interest. It is not part of  curriculum anywhere in east or west. One of the things which every good willing human can  do is to speak reason, pass the reason to others. Once somebody learns  to reason he/she can solve many of the problems.

Once majority of Indians ask for rational debate, media will be forced to serve rational debate. Right now even if we have Modi govt, still it is Congress and Muslim think tanks which is controlling the institutions and rules of debate, they are masters.  Brokers (news traders) are still thinking their good old days  will come back (When Govt was patronizing media houses as means of maintaining their grip on people), Modi may not have complete grip on rajyasabha in future, Muslims will be very numerous and strong. Right now they don't think that  Modi  type development and reason based politics is here to stay  forever. They will change their catering habits once they realize majority doesn't respond to their spin (which  didn't happen in Delhi election, people voted as media wanted)  and anti-people stance is proving costly. 

India  was golden bird because our ancestors were more reasonable than other  tribes of the world,  reason brought peace. Afterwards we quit reason and adopted luxury and dogma, our Kings didn't know when to fight, whom to fight and why, false emotions eclipsed their reason (Historian James Todd said "Rajput doesn't know why and how to fight, he just wants to die"). 

There is scope for not only solving contemporary problems of polity, society  but also for future in which our heads will be held high. We must get into serious thinking instead of hurrying up to solutions to pacify ourselves. There was something missing, we must ask why we lost to Muslim invaders. Neither knowing yourself nor the enemy leads to defeat upon defeat. 

Our strength lies in transformation, willingness to change and adapt. But to change we must question the existing. Dinosaurs became extinct because they could not adapt with time, Christianity is dying in west, Islam will also die some day. Only reason  Hindu-Buddhist culture will survive longer (before it merges into single  human identity as sought by sages)  is the room it provides for reason, room for adapting to new information produced by coming generations and needs of humanity. We adapted to Rama, Buddha, Kabir,  ten gurus of Punjab, Swami Vivekanand. We did not fix it to wisdom of one person who lived ten thousand year ago, we evolved all the time. When we  write motivation letter for job, every next time we write it better and  better, if we write once and don't revise then ? If Europeans  have been satisfied with lollipop of Bible, they would never have  discovered the modern science. I am not comparing Bible with Vedas, in-fact ancient Indians were very advanced in their understanding of  human psychology which is origin of most human problems, but we must  accept there is scope for improvement, that we can include some of new research and contradict something. Lollypop satisfaction can spoil  the brightest student. On every society pressure to flatter themselves is much bigger than realization of inherent weakness, we are not exception. 

There is no limit to human  achievement and endeavour, future will bring much better thinkers than  we remember, this is natural if one understands how time flows and  evolution works. If not us then someone else will do it, so better jump.  Bharat can become wishwa guru only  if we produce young heroes (he/she) with best reasoning ability and character.

If we look into thinking process of ideologues of RSS, they tried to concentrate energy to change our home, they didn't go for politics, media and JNU. RSS couldn't achieve the expected after death of Guruji Golwalkar.  I think it was upto some of the nationalists outside RSS, who should have focused on media and University campuses. ABVP was one attempt by RSS.

Savarkar : "ये  हिन्दुस्थान का नक्शा जो हम बचपन से देखते आए हैं वो अब विच्छिन्न हो चुका है, दो टुकड़ो मे फाड़ दिया गया है, ये पाकिस्तान हिन्दुस्थान की छाति मे घुसा बान है, यह राज्य कौन सा है, किसने इसे बनाया? मुसलमानो ने नही, इंग्लेंड ने नही, हिन्दुओ ने इसे बनाया है, इसे हमने बनाया है, we created Pakistan. "

I am trying to raise two completely neglected issues. Its my humble request to raise more awareness on these. 
(1) Muslims of India voted for pakistan in 1945 elections. Pakistan was created by and for Indian Muslims. The issue has been intentionally hid from history books. I accept any debate and verification. 
1945-1946 Elections, Who voted for separate nation Pakistan?
(2) The way to counter Kashmir argument by Pakistan, and alibi of seculars that Kashmir a Muslim majority is symbol of Indian secularism (dispite genocide of Hindus), is that raise the issue of Hindu majority areas which were given to Pakistan and East Pakistan(Bangladesh).
Hindu-Buddhist Majority Areas Gifted to Pakistan

This is the privilege so called liberal journalists had during Congress regime. Obviously they will hate Modi. 

1000 Years of Muslim Rule on India Was Period of Slavery

1. 1000 years of Muslim rule was real slavery. No different from the way Africans were treated by Europeans. 

2. How can a rule in which ruling class considers themselves alien arab, persian(even though they were mostly forcible Hindu converts), whose loyatly was with Mekkah and Ummah be Indian? How can a rule which treats 90% population as enemy, be self rule? 

3. During muslim rule there was apartheid. 
During Muslim rule a Hindu farmer would pay half of his produce as tax, then Jajiya, then tax for using Ganga Ghats. Pay tax when a kid is born. While muslim farmer will pay a quarter, one tenth or sometimes they were not required to pay at all. That money was used to raze indian institutions, temples and build mosques, minars on top of it. Very few people know that Shahjehan cut the hands of all 20,000 artisans after finishing Tajmahel. 

4. Only secular muslim was Dara Sikoh, But ask to change the name of Aurangjeb road to Dara Sikoh road, or Aurangabad to Darabad, muslims will cry everywhere. For them Aurangjeb is their role model. Ibrahim Khan Gardy was also secular muslim in Maratha army, he was killed brutaly by Abdali after Panipat when he refused to say kalama in arabic, because he used to say it in marathi.

5. 1761 Panipat battle between Maratha and Afghans, all muslim Nababs sent their armies to fight for afghans. This shows their loyalty.

6. During freedom struggle Hindu were fighting for independence of India but muslims were rioting against Hindus to establish Khilafat in turkey.  Neither Jinnah, nor Aga Khan, nor Liakat Ali Khan ever went to jail because they were not interested in Indian Independence. Their were interested in Turkey, creating Islamic nation. Abul Kalam Ajad was exception but he didnot get a single muslim reserved seat for Congress, not even 5% of Muslim voted Congress in muslim reserved seats. 

5. 1945 elections and 1946 elections all muslims of present Inida voted to create Pakistan. Pakistan was demanded mostly by muslims of Bihar, UP, Punjab, MP, Bengal, Hyderabad. But after partion they stayed here, those very muslims who had done massacre of Hindus in Kolkata 16-18 august 1946, they started talking differently overnight after 15 august 1947. 
This questioned was asked by Sardar Patel himself, who was only person (apart from Purrushottam Das Tondon inside Congress cabinet of ministers) to have courage to speak the truth.

1945-1946 Elections, Who voted for separate nation Pakistan?

Offcourse their loyalty did not change, they still celebrate Pakistan victory in cricket. They kill every non-muslim in kashmir and they shelter Bangladeshi Muslims. It was Indian muslims, Jamindars, Nabbas, Ulemas, who said they cant live in a democratic set up with other Indians, because they were not one of us they considered themselves as rulers of India, foreigners, so they needed a separate nation from Indians. . 

6. Muslims were first people in India who didnot consider themselves Hindu. The word which connects a man to glory and past of the land of Sindhus. Loyalty of a muslim is not with India, they hate Indian language, Indian culture, Indian Heros, Indian scholars, Indian History everything. Their role model is foreign invaders who raped their mothers and put them in their harems, who converted their ancestors on tip of sword. Have u ever heard a muslim keeping any indian name? any language. They use arabic name. Show me  example where muslim shows respect for Indian history which is not Islamic, which is from before 712. Their nation is Islamic Arabic, they wish they were Arabs. Show me a single muslim religious stuff where they use any Indian language, cultural symbol. They use persian, afghan but not Indian. They will use English, French but not Indian language. They adopt western etiquettes but anything Indian is something that must be hated. Westerners, Europeans no other civilization is so much hateful to Indian roots, Indian people, Indian culture as Muslim invaders inspired in themselves and among newly converts. 

7. During 1000 years of muslim rule muslims destroyed 6 great univerities of India and the world, all temples of North India, including Ram janmbhumi, krishna, and Kashi Wivshawanath. Can u believe how come in the land where Hindus there is not a single temple in north India more than 300-400 years old? Because each and every symbol of Hindus were destroyed. Hindus were kept alive just to work in fields and fill their coffers. Just as a farmer need bull muslim rulers needed Hindus. 

8. India exists for 5000 years atleast, country was not made by Congress or Nehru, Country was made by our rishis, heros like Rama, Krishna, Ashoka, Buddha, Nanak, Shivaji. Our people who worked in the field, who wrote Vedas, who wrote smritis, puranas, who gave message of 'ekam sat viprah bahudha vadanti'. Every one who adapted to Indian culture /heritage and contributed to it in his/her own way. Muslim envaders didnot adapt or contribute, they maintained separate identity from Indians. They sought to annihilate it. And majority of their India born progeny  seeks to do it till this day. Kashmir is latest example. 

9. 200 years of british rule was much better. In Britsh rule there was police, justice courts etc. You can build temples, schools everything. Once a British Ploice officer said to Premchand after he wrote soje watan"Thank the God it is British rule and u have just been called in police station for writing against govt, If it were rule of Mughals by this time you would have lost your both hands". But coward Hindus as aways for 1400 years or so did not ever mustered courage to say a word against Muslim atrocities during british rule which were more than British atrocities, You count it, in malabar, kohat, comilla every year there were riots  in british India and muslims willing to finish Hindus. Check names of remote Indian villages in UP, MP and Bihar, which were under Muslim Jamindars, most of them have arabic names, Haidarpur, Shultanpur, Mohiuddinpur etc. 

10. You go to a Muslim, to ask his boy or girl for wedding and without you converting to Islam. In 99% case he will marry his child to a Arab, an African Muslim but not to a Hindu, so much hatred for Indian-ness. 

11. Show me a single example when a Muslim ruler married their girl to Hindu king? They married to arabs, turks, persians. And they forced Hindus to give their daughters or face death. Rajputs of Rajasthan sent their daughters to Akbars harem to save their masses. Else like Akbar did slaughter of all men, child, old in Chittaur. 

12. In every attack or fight, after the fight they used to kill entire population even after 500-600 years stay in India. Vijaynagar, Chittaur ask it. Can you expect Indians to commit genocide of Indians? Can anyone show me example where British sought to commit genocide on population, to destroy temple, university etc? Did British attack Somanath, Ayodhya, Kashi, Mathura?  Or Kanishka did it? Or ever Ashoka/ Vikramaditya killed innocent farmers of Kalinga? Or do any Muslim king ever killed muslim population of opponent after war? It was always reserved for non-muslim Indians. Almost every loosing battle in Rajasthan, Gwalior, Malwa meant Indians have to beahead their wemen folk, kids, and olds, to save them from getting raped and tortured. Those who were not so brave to behead, they used to ask them to take poison or jump into the wells. Latest happened in Rajauri in 1947 before rumour spread that pakistani are going to take on the city. 2000-3000 wemen made a fire and jumped into it. Even worst foreigners didnot dare to commit such atrocities. 

13. A guest comes and starts living with you may become your family. A person who comes robs and goes off is foreigner. But a person who comes forcibly into your house, rapes your family and then asks you to bow to his own folks in another house, makes u slave in your own house is not a guest he is enemy, worst than foreigner. 

14. British played divide and rule as a foreigner, but they were just using Muslim desire to contain other Indians. Muslim invaders created worst divide among Indian people, a divide which laid foundation of complete separation from Indianess, Indian values. A rule which created the most Hindu/India hating culture. They created a class of converts with a view that anything which has Indian roots must be opposed and hated in persuasion of making Arabic ideology rule the land of India. India for them is a peace of land which must be conquered and made subservient to Arabic interests without any question. They loved this peace of land, they loved the slaves, harem women nothing more. If you give chance to evil people of all world to do so every one will come here and stay there. Do they become Indian? Do 20 million bangladeshi Muslims become Indian by staying in India? Just 60 years ago they led biggest bloodshed during partition in Noakhali, Kolkata, MaymenSingh to create Islamic Republic of Pakistan and even now they commit atrocities on Hindus/Buddhist/Christians any non-muslims. Muslims of India were calling Kings of Afghanistan, Iran and Arabs during british rule to attack India and create rule of Islam here again, to get rid of impending Hindu rule(they considered democracy as Hindu rule). Who created this chasm in India? Who planted these seeds of separation? Muslim invaders offcourse. Not Huns, Sak and other tribes. They came and became one with us.

15. Muslim invaders are national Heroes of Pakistan, because that nation is formed on the basis of Hindu hatred, India hatred, India, Hindu, Sikh, Jain, Buddhist, any culture which is Indian is napak so they created Pakistan. Do you think we Indians ourselves also hate India to have such common views on nationality and we should also hate ourselves and surrender to become Islamic Republic of Pakistan? Pakistanis come to see delhi qutub minar which Quttubuddin built after demolishing 27 Indian temples and he put heads of thousands of Indian warriors in the plinth, such nationalism is Indian symbol? Off course people who sided with Abdali the afghan invader who returned back to afghanistan after taking 2 lakh hosatage Hindu wemen children for them Abdali, Gauri, Bin Qasem, Hejjaj all are Indian, despite the fact that Abdali returned to afghanistan, Gauri too returned leaving his slaves to rule India Ghulam Wansh, Hejjaj was Iraqui returned to Iraq, Nadir Shah was Irani returned to Iran, still they are Heroes and Indian! For a muslim India is his jagir and belongs to Ummah. Whole world is their jagir given to them by Allah so in that sense they claim India. 

16. Islam doesnot believe in nationality, every non-muslim is not to be treated as equal human, there is only one nation that is ummah, muslims living in different countries have only one brotherhood loyalty that is to ummah. Muslims of India(including Pakistan as pak is also India) have shown it over and over. Islam asks to kill apostates, brothers if he disobeys Islam, how can we non-muslim Indians be same nation, are we bigger than apostate brothers? Indian nation majority of which are not to be considered even human, but enemies as per Islam which is always above anything, why do you claim to be part of it? Just to blow dust in our eyes until you completely annihilate us?  Or you just want to lay claim as rulers ? Nation doesn't belong to rulers, it belongs to masses who have a connection and feeling for nation, a willingness to suffer for it. 

17. Can anyone show me a single muslim majority area which has wanted to stay with India, Hyderabad muslims built Rajkar army to kill rape and rule over 90% Hindus of Hyderabad state. Kashmir. Pakistan, Bangladesh. Is it magic that when you are small in numbers you become Indian? Why does this magic disappear when muslims intentionally and repeatedly asked during 1906 to 1947 for separate state as they said they dont feel as a nation with Indian majority? But after taking a separate nation, muslims conveniently said they are with India so that they can claim more land in future. Rule of Muslim invaders which created such traitors cant be Indian rule. 
If British had stayed 500 years more and made us Christians or kind of people whose loyalty lies with queen of England on the tip of gun barrel, would have made a portion of population blood thirsty and anti-Indian in every aspect, for whom History would have started from British East India company , will you be willing to call such a rule as Indian rule? Now you change British with Muslims, now your opinion changes. Because now you are really afraid of honest opinion out of fear. 

18. A question to Indian non-muslims who argue opposite to me and try to find many other reasons. Do you do it with logical conviction or out of fear, convenience, habit for sycophancy or you just because you are not concerned you debate it as time pass, or over the time you have thought in a illogical way and now logic hurts your ego?
I have a blog to answer such type of people also. 
Hindu Liberalism: Facade to Cover Dishonesty

Don't ever expect a Muslim to accept truth or honest debate. Their faith is hurt by a single truth. 

I will debate with any Muslim who first accepts that their ancestors were Hindu, that Muslim atrocity on Indians was wrong, that Muslim rule on India was wrong and creation of Pakistan was wrong. Before this no debate. You cannot act in accordance with two nation theory, maintain two separate identity and still say you respect secularism, India. This is throwing dust in open eyes. And if you feel you are very powerful, you don't need to respect Indian identity. Then obviously no debate. 

For those who dont understand the nuisance of religion apartheid and wish to understand it.
'Religion' is Apartheid and Flawed Western/Islamic concept

I will conclude with one line, fear of truth is pervades most of humans, regardless of race, nation and apartheid called religion.