Thursday, January 23, 2020

Problem in Achieving Peace in Middle-East

Terrorists are just manifestation of political road-map laid by Quran, Hadith, Sunnah. Which makes it amply clear that anyone who doesn't follow this book has to be intimidated and eliminated.

As long as liberal world  choose not to critically analyze and not show will to fight root cause, terrorism will continue, despite all the peace prayers  which are more a matter of convenience, a need to save oneself from facing the reality.

Muslims willing or  unwilling don't want to rectify their thought process and holy books, which need to be amended in order to provide equal treatment to all Human beings by Islam. If they do then it will not be Islam.

Problems of middle east:

We often hear only Islamic narrative of things, peddled by media. Any rational debate on subject must involve Israeli counterpart as well, but that doesn't happen. 

(1) When Muslims block anyone from entering Mekkah or Madina, miles away. Why don't they respect right of Jews and Christians to their religious sites like Jerusalem, Bathleham, which are not that important to Muslims? Jews and Christians did not leave the places just in peace, they were forced by Arab Muslims. Can one imagine how Muslims will react if Israel today occupies Mekkah?

(2) When all of Arab countries evacuated all Jews in total 1 million or more between 1948 and 1970, killed thousands of Christians which were very predominant in Arab in time of prophet also, why don't they accept Israeli hegemony in Israel? Don't they have right to 20,000 square kilometers?

(3) If Arabs wanted they could have accommodated Palestinians or developed Gaza but they don't. Israel is one thousand times smaller land compared to land area of Muslim countries. Why does it make such ego problem to all Muslim countries of the world?

(4) Arab countries have 70% of worlds oil Resources, The amount they spend on promoting Jihad against Jews, If they spend 10% of that on people of Gaza, life will be very good and they may not insist on jihad and killing, but Arabs are not saddened by plight of Gaza but they are saddened by existence of Jews.

(4) Should Israel lay arm and get killed in their rocket attacks? get their women raped and kids butchered? Don't they have right to self defense and existence? All attacks they do are necessitated by self defense.

(5) This pattern reflects every where, they eliminated every single hindu, Buddhis, Sikh, Jain religious site in Indian continent.

(6) Why do Palestinians provide shield to Hamas launching sites  despite warning from Israeli that they will be firing a particular launching site?

(7) Why do they don't ask Hamas  to make peace and stop attacking Israel? Why  Hamas insists on eliminating Jews?

(8) Suppose Arabs succeed in killing every Jew in Israel, will Jew hatred will stop? No never, It predates creation of Israel, Koran is full of Versus with Jew Hatred. It started in Madina in 6 AD. Only thing will happen is that Muslims will find another excuse. Reminds me of riots in India, always they say Quran was desecrated. Nobody gives a shit to Quran still.

(9) Palestinian Arabs are not from ancient Palestine but from Arab root. 



No prophet or Koran can encroach on our right to believe the way we want. 

One YouTube video, one Israeli guy says "Gandhi was not Jewish......to tell the truth, if Gandhi had laid himself in front of an Arab tank, instead of a British tank, you know the only thing would have been left was his lion-cloth. "

He was right, only thing that was left to Hindus in Pakistan, Bangladesh, Kashmir was lion-cloth. They didn't care for Gandhi. 

This green shade is amount of land Muslims have. And they claim they are fighting against Israeli occupation. They have occupied holiest of Jewish religious site, Temple Mount and built mosque over there. And Muslims claim they are fighting for justice. 


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hamas had made a base in this building below, destroyed by IDF on 15 May, during 2021 war....Al Jazeera, Associate Press and other news agencies had chosen to be their Human Shield! How can we expect media to be impartial? Several thousands of media outlets use AP material directly


Read this article to understand how Associated Press reports on Israel. It’s  a long article but very detailed first person account.

"To make sense of most international journalism from Israel, it is important first to understand that the news tells us far less about Israel than about the people writing the news."

"In these circles, in my experience, a distaste for Israel has come to be something between an acceptable prejudice and a prerequisite for entry. "

"The AP staff in Gaza City would witness a rocket launch right beside their office, endangering reporters and other civilians nearby—and the AP wouldn’t report it, not even in AP articles about Israeli claims that Hamas was launching rockets from residential areas."

"Cameramen waiting outside Shifa Hospital in Gaza City would film the arrival of civilian casualties and then, at a signal from an official, turn off their cameras when wounded and dead fighters came in, helping Hamas maintain the illusion that only civilians were dying."

"The current spokesman at the UN agency for Palestinian refugees in Gaza, for example, is a former BBC man. A Palestinian woman who participated in protests against Israel and tweeted furiously about Israel a few years ago served at the same time as a spokesperson for a UN office."

"..........with Yazidis, Christians, and Kurds falling back before the forces of radical Islam not far away from here, this ideology’s local franchise launched its latest war against the last thriving minority in the Middle East."
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Schools: Google it, “ UNRWA CONDEMNS PLACEMENT OF ROCKETS, FOR A SECOND TIME, IN ONE OF ITS SCHOOLS”



Hamas put rockets inside US run schools. Media never shows it. 

Human shield strategy: How to use children to fight? The teaching to die for religion in the text book that teaching at school in order to take “Jerusalem”. This why they willing to use children in the frontline. here:



"Examples of content found in Palestinian school books include references to violence, martyrdom and terror,"

Media only shows Bombarding of buildings, not telling that it was Hamas rocket launching site, and that Israel gave them sufficient time to evacuate the building. Even cameramen often have very good amount of time to film well. 


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

16 May 2021: Slogans shouted by mobs in London: 'death to Jews'. 
Cars festooned with Palestinian flags are going through heavily Jewish neighborhoods of London with loudspeakers blaring, "F*ck the Jews. Fuck their mothers, Rape their daughters."

On 15th May 2021, a pro-Palestinian rally in Belgium shouts "Death to the Jews". 

Under these conditions Israel is only more legitimate, else they will have no place on the earth. 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Indian politicians never opened mouth for Hindus in Kashmir, Pakistan and Bangladesh. Nor for Yazidis, Kurds, Christians in the middle east. 
In 1999, in the fist sitting of Loksabha, first topic to be raised was topic of Israel Palestine, by Communists. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
While  Israel confers honorary Israeli citizenship on Soumya Santhosh, Indian national killed in Hamas firing from Gaza. Kerala CM did not even name Hamas, rocket, Palestine. No elected representatives from Kerala even visited her family. Political parties spoke on Palestine but not on her. 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
While  A Pakistani member of Parliament was giving anti Jewish speech, quoting and praising Hitler. And all the other members of Parliament clapped. 

A rally in UK

How convenient it is, that so called liberals say 99 days that terrorism has no religion and that one day when Israel retaliates, Muslims say Jews are terrorist and so called liberals stay silent. 

Tuesday, January 14, 2020

Who was friend of British, Savarkar or Gandhi/Congress?

No indian politician had as many close friends among British as Gnadhi and second would be Nehru.

Gandhi helped British during Boer wars.


Gandhi (fifth from left, middle row) with members of the Indian ambulance corps during second Boer war.

Gandhi supported British Empire during first world war, gave call to Indian youth to enrol in British Army.

Savarkar served harsh imprisonment in Andman, where as Gandhi and Nehru were jailed to guest house type prisons.

Gandhi never took such acts which Savarkar did, so Gnadhi was in permanent agreement with Brits, like most people.

H G Wells writes that British mostly found Gandhi to be very useful person, who would not let events go violent and out of control.




Congress Party

Congress party was founded by a British Civil Servant Allan Octavian Hume, with the aim to create a platform for dialogue between Indians and British. The 4th, 5th, 10th, 20th, 26th, and 33rd president of Congress were British. Congress did not demand Indian independence till end of World War I. Congress cooperated with British governments, and their demands were usually limited to more rights like representation in British parliament, granting British citizenship to all Indians etc. 

Can we say Congress was playing fiddle of British? 

In 1946, Nehru accepted to work in Viceroys council as a minister, then he took oath of loyalty in the name of King George VI, calling him emperor of India.  Savarkar never took oath of loyalty to British. 

Even today so called liberal politicians, routinely invoke foreign powers, write to American Congress to intervene in internal matters of India, to defeat BJP. Did not Jaichand and Man Singh do the same? 
60 MPs signed the letter to Barack Obama, asking him to deny visa to Modi Ji when he was chief minister. 


Iqbal wrote couplets in the praise of Queen Victoria.  Will Congress blame Iqbal? Most of the freedom fighters were Hindu and Sikh, barring some exceptions. Muslim League worked and cooperated with British system. Have you known about any Movement of Muslims League against British? After Independence Pakistan was became full fledged ally of UK and USA, partner of NATO. Almost all Muslims voted for creation of Pakistan in 1946. RSS, Savarkar opposed partition, Congress accepted partition. But Congress and Indian leftists are busy spreading rumors about Savarkar and RSS, claiming Muslims to be patriot. Owaisi Razakars worked with British, Jinnah, those Muslims who signed Shimla agreement worked with British, not Savarkar. 



Leftists had signed mercy petition for Afjal Guru, slogans were shouted in JNU "Kitne Afjal maroge Har ghar se Afjal nilega.." But they have courage to raise fingers at Savarkar. 

Nizam of Hyderabad was an staunch supporter of British during 1857 rebellion, which won him a lot of British favor, which continued till pre 1947. All Nizams of Hyderabad remained pro British. These guns were specially prepared for him by British companies. 



_______________________________________________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Even Peiyar went against Gandhi and Congress. Was Periyar terrorist? Ambedkar and many other eminent Dalit thinkers including Kanshi Ram thought that "राजनितिक परिवर्तन से पहले सामाजिक और आर्थिक परिवर्तन जरुरी है, अंग्रेजो को निकलने से पहले हमें समाज व्यवस्था और अर्थ व्यवस्था को सुधारना चाहिए "


 "There is something called strategy to come out of prison. How can it be termed as surrender or mercy?" ‘Does he (Rahul Gandhi) have stature to talk about Savarkar?’. 
_______________________________________________________________________________________________

Gandhi asked Hindus in Muslim majority areas to give up their life, so that it will bring peace, it will change the heart of neighbors. 
Gandhi made similar request to Jews that they should walk to gas chambers themselves. 
Gandhi was not behaving like a responsible politician. Gandhi was an irresponsible person. 
A person who is asking a community to surrender itself to mass slaughter, is not speaking from a position of responsibility at the very least. 
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
How many times Rahul Gandhi, Kejriwal, etc have apologized in court? 

Mahatma Gandhi, Sardar Patel and Bal Gangadhar Tilak petitioned the government for his release. It is true that towards the end of his term in the Andamans, he requested the British to grant him amnesty.

In 1924, Savarkar was such a threat to British even after 14 year of rigorous imprisonment, that they kept him confined in Ratnagiri for 13 more years. But the same British allowed Nehru-Gandhi to move freely across India, even facilitating their travel to UK. Even the British knew who was a threat & who were sepoys. British kept Savarkar in detention for 27 years because they knew his ideas posed the sharpest threat to their rule. British stand vindicated today as the ideological roots he laid even under imprisonment have grown for a 100 years into the Hindutva movement ruling India today. But British let Nehru & Gandhi roam freely around the nation as they knew they were pets on a leash that could be pulled back anytime. Not just India, they even travelled to UK. Only freedom fighters in human history to travel to the occupier nation under their full protection.