I have always argued that Indian JNU and AMU think tank is not a leftist think tank but a gang of Islamist and self serving non-Muslim mercenaries veiled as communist. Both of these have hijacked the narrative, they find each other complementary and serve each other under Indian leftist umbrella. They dont allow any real leftist to get in.
Just an example how left and Islamist work together
Karl Marx was born to Jewish parents. Israel was a socialist country until 1980s. But Indian leftist liberals hate Israel and love Marx at the same time. What is relation of Indian leftists with Islamic Arab countries, except Islam? 1999 when parliament is held after Loksabha, on the first day, first question of Palestine Israel was raised by left parties and house is adjourned amid the raucous. What makes Palestine so important for left parties? Close to my house, there was office of CPI-ML, every year on the eve of 6th December they organized huge protests with thousands of poor people participating in the rally. What makes left so much attached to Babri structure? Left parties supported Muslim League and idea of Pakistan before 1947. Karl Marx said "..Religion is opium of masses..". Opium of Indian leftist is Islam. Track details of any Muslim leftist in India, he is hardcore Islamist and so called atheist leftist born in Hindu families are complicit.
Birth of liberal world is often ascribed to the age of Voltaire.
During French Revolution, in Kangaroo court called French Convention, those who wanted position of king to be completely removed sat on left and those who wanted a weak king plus people rule sat on the right.
Ask you liberal friends to study Voltaire or hold a discussion exhibition on Views of Voltaire on Islam.
Voltaire's views about Islam were generally negative, and he found its holy book, the Quran, to be ignorant of the laws of physics. In a 1740 letter to Frederick II of Prussia, Voltaire ascribes to Muhammad a brutality that "is assuredly nothing any man can excuse" and suggests that his following stemmed from superstition; Voltaire continued, "But that a camel-merchant should stir up insurrection in his village; that in league with some miserable followers he persuades them that he talks with the angel Gabriel; that he boasts of having been carried to heaven, where he received in part this unintelligible book, each page of which makes common sense shudder; that, to pay homage to this book, he delivers his country to iron and flame; that he cuts the throats of fathers and kidnaps daughters; that he gives to the defeated the choice of his religion or death: this is assuredly nothing any man can excuse, at least if he was not born a Turk, or if superstition has not extinguished all natural light in him."
Refernce: https://archive.org/details/oeuvrescomplete09voltgoog
he wrote again about Mohammed and Islam in "De l'Alcoran et de Mahomet" ("On the Quran and on Mohammed"). In this essay, Voltaire maintained that Mohammed was a "sublime charlatan". Drawing on complementary information in Herbelot's "Oriental Library", Voltaire, according to René Pomeau, adjudged the Quran, with its "contradictions, ... absurdities, ... anachronisms", to be "rhapsody, without connection, without order, and without art".
Fanaticism, or Mahomet the Prophet
https://www.amazon.com/Fanaticism-Mahomet-Prophet-Voltaire/dp/1936117819/ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&keywords=mahomet+voltaire&qid=1594116418&sr=8-1
He wrote in this play, about Mohammed tricking his son Zaid to divorce his wife Zainab, so that he can marry her.
He regarded Hindus as "a peaceful and innocent people, equally incapable of hurting others or of defending themselves." Voltaire was himself a supporter of animal rights and was a vegetarian. He used the antiquity of Hinduism to land what he saw as a devastating blow to the Bible's claims and acknowledged that the Hindus' treatment of animals showed a shaming alternative to the immorality of European imperialists.
Story of a Good Brahmin
https://www.k-state.edu/english/baker/english287/Voltaire-Story_of_a_Good_Brahmin.htm
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/9137064-story-of-a-good-brahmin
The world of Indian civilization
https://www.amazon.com/world-Indian-civilization/dp/0814805817/ref=sr_1_4?dchild=1&keywords=gustave+le+bon+india&qid=1594116497&sr=8-4
What Muslims think about Left
Birth of liberal world is often ascribed to the age of Voltaire.
During French Revolution, in Kangaroo court called French Convention, those who wanted position of king to be completely removed sat on left and those who wanted a weak king plus people rule sat on the right.
Ask you liberal friends to study Voltaire or hold a discussion exhibition on Views of Voltaire on Islam.
Voltaire "Secularisme"
European definition of secular is derived from Voltaire's definition of "secularisme". Secularism has its origins in the Enlightenment. Voltaire asked people to turn away from a notion of God and claimed to be able to find answers to existential questions purely within human knowledge and science. Secularization refers to the increasing orientation of man on this world, the earthly.
In India secularism has come to mean blind respect of Muslim narrative.
Voltaire views about Islam
Voltaire's views about Islam were generally negative, and he found its holy book, the Quran, to be ignorant of the laws of physics. In a 1740 letter to Frederick II of Prussia, Voltaire ascribes to Muhammad a brutality that "is assuredly nothing any man can excuse" and suggests that his following stemmed from superstition; Voltaire continued, "But that a camel-merchant should stir up insurrection in his village; that in league with some miserable followers he persuades them that he talks with the angel Gabriel; that he boasts of having been carried to heaven, where he received in part this unintelligible book, each page of which makes common sense shudder; that, to pay homage to this book, he delivers his country to iron and flame; that he cuts the throats of fathers and kidnaps daughters; that he gives to the defeated the choice of his religion or death: this is assuredly nothing any man can excuse, at least if he was not born a Turk, or if superstition has not extinguished all natural light in him."
Refernce: https://archive.org/details/oeuvrescomplete09voltgoog
he wrote again about Mohammed and Islam in "De l'Alcoran et de Mahomet" ("On the Quran and on Mohammed"). In this essay, Voltaire maintained that Mohammed was a "sublime charlatan". Drawing on complementary information in Herbelot's "Oriental Library", Voltaire, according to René Pomeau, adjudged the Quran, with its "contradictions, ... absurdities, ... anachronisms", to be "rhapsody, without connection, without order, and without art".
Fanaticism, or Mahomet the Prophet
https://www.amazon.com/Fanaticism-Mahomet-Prophet-Voltaire/dp/1936117819/ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&keywords=mahomet+voltaire&qid=1594116418&sr=8-1
He wrote in this play, about Mohammed tricking his son Zaid to divorce his wife Zainab, so that he can marry her.
Voltaire on Hinduism
Commenting on the sacred texts of the Hindus, the Vedas, Voltaire observed: The Veda was the most precious gift for which the West had ever been indebted to the East.He regarded Hindus as "a peaceful and innocent people, equally incapable of hurting others or of defending themselves." Voltaire was himself a supporter of animal rights and was a vegetarian. He used the antiquity of Hinduism to land what he saw as a devastating blow to the Bible's claims and acknowledged that the Hindus' treatment of animals showed a shaming alternative to the immorality of European imperialists.
Story of a Good Brahmin
https://www.k-state.edu/english/baker/english287/Voltaire-Story_of_a_Good_Brahmin.htm
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/9137064-story-of-a-good-brahmin
Gustave le Bon on India
The world of Indian civilization
https://www.amazon.com/world-Indian-civilization/dp/0814805817/ref=sr_1_4?dchild=1&keywords=gustave+le+bon+india&qid=1594116497&sr=8-4
What Muslims think about Left
Karl Marx had said that religion is Opium of masses.
Communism in India, from supporting partition in 1946-47 to taking support of a Muslim Religious cleric Abbas Siddhqui.This is Indian quality, they borrow everything like democracy or communism or technology, universities form the west only for namesake. Inside they work with the same selfish spineless mentality, in which everything other than self interest is an illusion.
Here democracy has been morphed into another contract, no party has internal democracy. Sonia, Mamata, Lalu, Mulayam, Karunanidhi, Thakre, Badals, Devegowda, etc are like old wine in the new bottle, old feudal mindset and the need for an external arbitrator, ruler in Indian masses.
Strategic Mistake by Indian Centre
We make strategic mistake by not distinguishing between communism and Islamism. India's so called communists are Islamism in all essence, only they cover it in communism to get acceptability of communism. We must not call them communist. Tarek fatah is real communist, I have similar views I am communist. Communist meaning Anti-India is fake. we always made this strategic mistake.
We play in their hands by giving them respect of communism. It is just like secularism is not bad, secularism didn't succeed in India because it was never secularism. It was Islamism.
They shoot on us behind the forts of secularism and communism and we keep fighting from outside and dying, never applying common sense to capture that fort which rightfully belongs to us.
and Last any war wont be successful unless ki ham billi ke gale me ghanti bandhe.
She the shameless parents of Kanhaiya Kumar
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5GpZ9I8DOg0
To this goes my facebook post.
Many are pointing finger on politicians, media, Mulla. While the real culprit always sits with us, dines with us, everything. Traitors were always socially acceptable in India, with full intention. One kejriwal is exposed, people will find another. While people (friends, relatives, every other relation) will always conveniently sit down until they get opportunity to be part of some AAP, Congress, media etc. Billi ke gale me ghanti kaun bandhe. Kaun bolega ki hamare so called dost, rishte wo hi asli gaddar hain. Kaun bolega ki bharat me culture ke naam pe hypocrisy hoti hai. Kaun bolega ki hamare maa baap hame sirf kaise bhi paisa aur power pana sikhate hain? Bring a adult from any other normal country, put him in any kind of school, he wont say his country murdabad. This special skill of deception Indian parents equip their children with.
JNU is just tip of iceberg, every panchayat has JNU type people. They were supported by students in Cambridge Harvard.
We play in their hands by giving them respect of communism. It is just like secularism is not bad, secularism didn't succeed in India because it was never secularism. It was Islamism.
They shoot on us behind the forts of secularism and communism and we keep fighting from outside and dying, never applying common sense to capture that fort which rightfully belongs to us.
and Last any war wont be successful unless ki ham billi ke gale me ghanti bandhe.
She the shameless parents of Kanhaiya Kumar
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5GpZ9I8DOg0
To this goes my facebook post.
Many are pointing finger on politicians, media, Mulla. While the real culprit always sits with us, dines with us, everything. Traitors were always socially acceptable in India, with full intention. One kejriwal is exposed, people will find another. While people (friends, relatives, every other relation) will always conveniently sit down until they get opportunity to be part of some AAP, Congress, media etc. Billi ke gale me ghanti kaun bandhe. Kaun bolega ki hamare so called dost, rishte wo hi asli gaddar hain. Kaun bolega ki bharat me culture ke naam pe hypocrisy hoti hai. Kaun bolega ki hamare maa baap hame sirf kaise bhi paisa aur power pana sikhate hain? Bring a adult from any other normal country, put him in any kind of school, he wont say his country murdabad. This special skill of deception Indian parents equip their children with.
JNU is just tip of iceberg, every panchayat has JNU type people. They were supported by students in Cambridge Harvard.
Moderate Islam doesn't Exist
Moderate Muslims, they create situation of victim-hood, they are being attacked, victimized, they justify every act of militants. They invent a reason for feeling denied. The only thing remains is to some crazy from group going overboard and becoming terrorist.
Once I asked my Hindu friends not to say things like take revenge and ek ka badla char se lenge. Just inform people, pretending to be ultra-liberal. Inform everything how they were treated as third class in India and things will automatically happen, automatically they will organize and take revenge. Same way moderate Islam works. They create the peaceful explosive. And some strays use it. But they say they cant be blamed for blowing up.
It is like I need to get talaq from my wife (assume), so what I will do is I will spread rumours, victim hood and everything, one day my mother, brother everyone will say throw this whore, and I they will throw her out. Without doing anything get it done.
Another analogy, when one needs to have sex with a girl, he can go straight to girl and girl will never agree in most cases, he will be maligned also. Another way is to pretend to be good enough to for girl to come close and slowly slowly drown her. Make girl feel warm enough that she herself will become mad about you, and then you can manipulate her emotions also taking advantage of her emotional dependence, now its her fault, not yours. This analogy is directly used by Muslims to fool Hindu/Sikh and White girls.
Moderate Muslims have same role in creating terrorists. They pretend to be moderate to save their face in international community. They keep the pot boiling enjoying liberalism of west and Hindus and someone among them who is susceptible to heat, does it, blows up or kills, others say no we did not tell him to blow, you didn't tell him to blow up but you did everything which convinced him to blowing himself up for a right cause. They enjoy the prospect of others blowing up for Islamic imperialism.
September October 2022
Contrast, when women in Iran are risking everything to get free from Hijab, Indian leftists have found their new moto in Burka (which they call Hijab, playing with words). That is their worldview, that is how retrogressive and negative left is. Leftist males should wear bangles and sit at home, Iranian ladies have shown much more courage which most men don't show.
