Voltaire, Gustave Le Bon, Indian Left, Islam, Hinduism

I have always argued that Indian JNU and AMU think tank is not a leftist think tank but a gang of Islamist and self serving non-Muslim mercenaries veiled as communist. Both of these have hijacked the narrative, they find each other complementary and serve each other under Indian leftist umbrella. They dont allow any real leftist to get in.

Just an example how left and Islamist work together

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OGrZX9P-4wU

Karl Marx was born to Jewish parents. Israel was a socialist country until 1980s. But Indian leftist liberals hate Israel and love Marx at the same time. What is relation of Indian leftists with Islamic Arab countries, except Islam? 1999 when parliament is held after Loksabha, on the first day, first question of Palestine Israel was raised by left parties and house is adjourned amid the raucous. What makes Palestine so important for left parties? Close to my house, there was office of CPI-ML, every year on the eve of 6th December they organized huge protests with thousands of poor people participating in the rally. What makes left so much attached to Babri structure? Left parties supported Muslim League and idea of Pakistan before 1947. Karl Marx said "..Religion is opium of masses..". Opium of Indian leftist is Islam. Track details of any Muslim leftist in India, he is hardcore Islamist and so called atheist leftist born in Hindu families are complicit. 

Birth of liberal world is often ascribed to the age of Voltaire.

During French Revolution, in Kangaroo court called French Convention, those who wanted position of king to be completely removed sat on left and those who wanted a weak king plus people rule sat on the right.

Ask you liberal friends to study Voltaire or hold a discussion exhibition on Views of Voltaire on Islam.

Voltaire "Secularisme"

European definition of secular is derived from Voltaire's definition of "secularisme".  Secularism has its origins in the Enlightenment. Voltaire asked people to turn away from a notion of God and claimed to be able to find answers to existential questions purely within human knowledge and science. Secularization refers to the increasing orientation of man on this world, the earthly. 

In India secularism has come to mean blind respect of Muslim narrative. 

Voltaire views about Islam 

Voltaire's views about Islam were generally negative, and he found its holy book, the Quran, to be ignorant of the laws of physics. In a 1740 letter to Frederick II of Prussia, Voltaire ascribes to Muhammad a brutality that "is assuredly nothing any man can excuse" and suggests that his following stemmed from superstition; Voltaire continued, "But that a camel-merchant should stir up insurrection in his village; that in league with some miserable followers he persuades them that he talks with the angel Gabriel; that he boasts of having been carried to heaven, where he received in part this unintelligible book, each page of which makes common sense shudder; that, to pay homage to this book, he delivers his country to iron and flame; that he cuts the throats of fathers and kidnaps daughters; that he gives to the defeated the choice of his religion or death: this is assuredly nothing any man can excuse, at least if he was not born a Turk, or if superstition has not extinguished all natural light in him."

Refernce: https://archive.org/details/oeuvrescomplete09voltgoog

he wrote again about Mohammed and Islam in "De l'Alcoran et de Mahomet" ("On the Quran and on Mohammed"). In this essay, Voltaire maintained that Mohammed was a "sublime charlatan". Drawing on complementary information in Herbelot's "Oriental Library", Voltaire, according to René Pomeau, adjudged the Quran, with its "contradictions, ... absurdities, ... anachronisms", to be "rhapsody, without connection, without order, and without art".

Fanaticism, or Mahomet the Prophet

https://www.amazon.com/Fanaticism-Mahomet-Prophet-Voltaire/dp/1936117819/ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&keywords=mahomet+voltaire&qid=1594116418&sr=8-1

He wrote in this play, about Mohammed tricking his son Zaid to divorce his wife Zainab, so that he can marry her. 

Voltaire on Hinduism

Commenting on the sacred texts of the Hindus, the Vedas, Voltaire observed: The Veda was the most precious gift for which the West had ever been indebted to the East.

He regarded Hindus as "a peaceful and innocent people, equally incapable of hurting others or of defending themselves." Voltaire was himself a supporter of animal rights and was a vegetarian. He used the antiquity of Hinduism to land what he saw as a devastating blow to the Bible's claims and acknowledged that the Hindus' treatment of animals showed a shaming alternative to the immorality of European imperialists.

Story of a Good Brahmin

https://www.k-state.edu/english/baker/english287/Voltaire-Story_of_a_Good_Brahmin.htm

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/9137064-story-of-a-good-brahmin

Gustave le Bon on India

The world of Indian civilization

https://www.amazon.com/world-Indian-civilization/dp/0814805817/ref=sr_1_4?dchild=1&keywords=gustave+le+bon+india&qid=1594116497&sr=8-4


What Muslims think about Left

Karl Marx had said that religion is Opium of masses.

Communism in India, from supporting partition in 1946-47 to taking support of a Muslim Religious cleric Abbas Siddhqui.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SzinXZSUH9o&fbclid=IwAR0R8pMuU3tZf7l7eL2LuTBJ7fRpoNRlDa6gumXP-11UvVT1gVp2VrcwX2I

This is Indian quality, they borrow everything like democracy or communism or technology, universities form the west only for namesake. Inside they work with the same selfish spineless mentality, in which everything other than self interest is an illusion.

Here democracy has been morphed into another contract, no party has internal democracy. Sonia, Mamata, Lalu, Mulayam, Karunanidhi, Thakre, Badals, Devegowda, etc are like old wine in the new bottle, old feudal mindset and the need for an external arbitrator, ruler in Indian masses.

Strategic Mistake by Indian Centre 

We make strategic mistake by not distinguishing between communism and Islamism. India's so called communists are Islamism in all essence, only they cover it in communism  to get acceptability of communism. We must not call them communist. Tarek fatah is real communist, I have similar views I am communist. Communist meaning Anti-India is fake. we always made this strategic mistake.

We play in their hands by giving them respect  of communism. It is just like secularism is not bad, secularism didn't succeed in India because it was never secularism. It was Islamism.

They shoot on us behind the forts of secularism and communism and we keep fighting from outside and dying, never applying common sense to capture that fort which rightfully belongs to us.

and Last any war wont be successful unless ki ham billi ke gale me ghanti bandhe.

She the shameless parents of Kanhaiya Kumar

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5GpZ9I8DOg0

To this goes my facebook post.

Many are pointing finger on politicians, media, Mulla. While the real culprit always sits with us, dines with us, everything. Traitors were always socially acceptable in India, with full intention. One kejriwal is exposed, people will find another. While people (friends, relatives, every other relation) will always conveniently sit down until they get opportunity to be part of some AAP, Congress, media etc. Billi ke gale me ghanti kaun bandhe. Kaun bolega ki hamare so called dost, rishte wo hi asli gaddar hain. Kaun bolega ki bharat me culture ke naam pe hypocrisy hoti hai. Kaun bolega ki hamare maa baap hame sirf kaise bhi paisa aur power pana sikhate hain? Bring a adult from any other normal country, put him in any kind of school, he wont say his country murdabad. This special skill of deception Indian parents equip their children with.

JNU is just tip of iceberg, every panchayat has JNU type people. They were supported by students in Cambridge Harvard. 

Moderate Islam doesn't Exist

Moderate Muslims, they create situation of victim-hood, they are being attacked, victimized, they justify every act of militants. They invent a reason for feeling denied. The only thing remains is to some crazy from group going overboard and becoming terrorist.

Once I asked my Hindu friends not to say things like take revenge and  ek ka badla char se lenge. Just inform people, pretending to be ultra-liberal. Inform everything how they were treated as third class in India and things will automatically happen, automatically they will organize and take revenge. Same way moderate Islam works. They create the peaceful explosive. And some strays use it. But they say they cant be blamed for blowing up. 

It is like I need to get talaq from my wife (assume), so what I will do is I will spread rumours, victim hood and everything, one day my mother, brother everyone will say throw this whore, and I they will throw her out. Without doing anything get it done.

Another analogy, when one needs to have sex with a girl, he can go straight to girl and girl will never agree in most cases, he will be maligned also. Another way is to pretend to be good enough to for girl to come close and slowly slowly drown her. Make girl feel warm enough that she herself will become mad about  you, and then you can manipulate her emotions also taking advantage of her emotional dependence, now its her fault, not yours. This analogy is directly used by Muslims to fool Hindu/Sikh and White girls.

Moderate Muslims have same role in creating terrorists. They pretend to be moderate to save their face in international community. They keep the pot boiling enjoying liberalism of west and Hindus and someone among them who is susceptible to heat, does it, blows up or kills, others say no we did not tell him to blow, you didn't tell him to blow up but you did everything which convinced him to blowing himself up for a right cause. They enjoy the prospect of others blowing up for Islamic imperialism.

September October 2022

Contrast, when women in Iran are risking everything to get free from Hijab, Indian leftists have found their new moto in Burka (which they call Hijab, playing with words). That is their worldview, that is how retrogressive and negative left is. Leftist males should wear bangles and sit at home, Iranian ladies have shown much more courage which most men don't show.

Insanity in Indian History Books about British involvement in Partition

Has to be read in conjunction with this blog
http://danasurdanu.blogspot.com/2014/07/1945-1946-elections-who-voted-for.html

Indian political system has been Childish and Devilish at once.

British early were racist and imperialist, as seen in the words of their philosophers like Maxmuller (Germany by birth)

 

But Indian leftist historians didn't criticize them for that part. People like Irfan Habib, Romila Thapar gave boost to Aryan invasion theory. Aim of Aryan invasion theory was to break the Hindus. 

On the other hand we have put a lot of false things about British in History, who were by no means any friend of ours at all on large, except individuals like Anie Beseant. This has been done to save the real culprits (Islamofacists) who are more important for Leftists than British. 

Indian History books highly exaggerate and entire blame of partition has been put on British (specifically intent of partition). As if British spent their entire time conspiring to partition India and their life depended on it.

History books in Pakistan portray India and Hindus as enemy till eternity and make no unpleasant reference to British. 
Since we don't have courage to talk about these Pakistani crooks and their allies in Indian think tanks and universities, we satisfy our ego and self worth by blaming British.
Except the conquests of Shivaji and Ranjit Singh, we don't have any significant victory to our name in last 1000 years. And we don't want to feel proud of Shivaji, lest our Muslim brother in laws would get upset. So we sometimes imagine fake victories and victim-hood against British out of air when we talk about partition and freedom struggle. Just as Pakistanis see every event as conspiracy by USA, Hindus and Jews. We sleep with our enemies in bedroom and blame a passer by.  British did not want to build a secretariat at birthplace of Rama in Ayodhya. They didn't want to make every Indian woman sleep with white man to change them to British. They didn't want to kill everyone who doesn't change himself into British and burns all the Sanskrit and choti. All these things happened in Kashmir, Pakistan and Bangladesh.

British ruled 24% of the land of the world before WWII and they had at stake trade, war debts, communist Soviet Union, rebuilding economy.
British slowly, and orderly vacated almost 3 dozen countries within 2-3 years.
British were not going to stay in Indian villages and towns, they didn't build their houses and church.
Their stake in India when they were leaving was limited, as it was in other parts of their empire.
And we forget that they defeated Hitler, Japan and similar important powers.

Common Indian is illiterate and has little knowledge about world than what he gets from WhatsApp and Facebook posts drafted by equally illiterate brothers.
There used to be a beggar in front of my school, he abused everybody because nobody paid him attention. I guess he took it seriously.

It is nuisance and preposterous to think that British would take Indians so seriously when they were leaving India. It is insanity and an exercise to boost our own assessment of our self worth. If check out History lessons in British schools, there is only very tiny place in it about India, they were not obsessed with Indians when they were leaving, as we would like to imagine, and we imagine just because we don't have anything else to talk or to show.

I don't know about any Indian contribution in modern technology in any field like physics, nuclear science, mathematics, engineering or anything of worth we contributed to modern sciences during last 500 years. British are gone for 70 years. I just recall that Hughes dock in Mumbai was Built by British more than 300 years ago, and in 21st century our new New dock for aircraft carrier in Mumbai is also engineered by a Dutch company. Most of the Engineering for Indian Navy Seabird project in Karwar is being done by Dutch companies. Most of important parts of our so called in-house fighter planes, we import from abroad. Same is true for every equipment or worth in our Naval ships. British left Hongkong in much better shape after 50 years in 1997, while Mumbai remains a ghetto agglomeration.  In British time cargo ships could come all the way to Kolkata, which was a big port city. Even though they didn't respect Indians, and like everyone else in the world they were selfish. But they did lot more for Indians by setting up institutions which enable us to function as democracy today and which we corrupted to the core. We produced leaders who were worse than British as far as sum total of Indian interests concerned, and read between the lines British knew us better than we knew, they foresaw the anarchy.

Unlike us who form our opinion just on emotion out of cloud, they studied everything methodically, including our psychology and our culture, they corrupted it when they needed. We are not capable of doing that with any other nation, even if it was wrong, they could do it.  Even today USA and UK have schools and departments which study different countries of the world, people and their psychology, that forms one of the major inputs for their foreign policy decisions. We Indians undermine everything we can, including study of our own history as if we were wannabe Arab or Mughals, I guess our diplomats (not trusting Kanhaiya Kumar types in our universities) take services of or follow material produced by experts in American universities. British deciphered Prakrit and Moryan edicts, unearthed Harappa, Mohanjodaro, Stupas, ruins of Nalanda and Vikramshila. British launched the great Survey of India in 1802, 50 years before laying railway lines, they created the maps, created record of soil, flora and fauna, found out height of Mt Everest. Almost all of the ground work for setting up democratic system in India was done by British from scratch. Constituent assembly was formed under British Guidance in 1946, before that Imperial Legislative Council and other structures existed at provincial and national level (reference: Government of India Act 1919 and 1935).  A major part of our constitution was copy cat of British and other constitutions. While we are still busy deciding whether it was Dr Ambedkar (he had studied constitution of many countries, but..) or Brahmin leaders and secretaries in the Drafting Committee who founded it from nowhere, like IIT professors who write engineering books by copying contents from different fundamental books published abroad, but are considered new Isaac Newton. Many of our acts predate to British India. It is madness to think that British were very upset and jealous after leaving India.

I am not denying intent of Macauley. All I am telling is our ancestors were willing accomplishes of Macauley and now that British are gone and we are accomplishes of those who think Arabs and Mughals gave us civilization and we are Mughals, our culture is eating protein rich Kebab, Beef biryani and marrying our sisters to Mughal blood men to express our gratitude.


Just to remind Indians, that almost all of the royalties in India, like Scindhias or Sikh maharajas after Ranjit singh were proud servants of British. Princes of Rajasthan lined up to do the services in insignificant positions in British army.  Never heard which Rajput prince turned the battle against Nazis in Normandy or against Japanese in Singapore, or helped British intelligence services with some breakthrough or were part of planning team of Churchill. Many of our glorified Rajput princes were probably unprofessional to be even officer in British Army, I guess they needed food cooked by a high caste Hindu. For many others understanding of English and studies in London was their sole achievement. Before British came most of the Rajput Royalty licked Mughals. 

These wars were fought on the base of technology, better fighter planes, war ships, tanks, communication and surveillance equipment, all about which we were completely ignorant. We Indians didn't know how to build a sewing needle on our own. We were proud just by providing manpower which could pull trigger of British machine guns (it would have impressed our untouchables castes back in village, who never saw a machine gun), and we even like to feel that they won battles because we fought. British just wanted recruits, they saw a Rajput prince (motivation for others to recruit) as they saw a Gorkha from remote village from Nepal or many other subjects of British empire across the globe they might have hired. Perhaps they always liked Gurkha much more because they might have much less attitude and were better in the field.

During second world war most of Indians fought on eastern front, with Japan. 40 thousand Indian soldiers surrendered in Singapore alone. We dont have any account of Japanese surrendering to British Indian army. Because Japanese soldier in 95% cases die in battle rather than surrendering. So Japanese considered Indians as characterless mercenaries. Who fought for British empire, and cowards who surrendered. Indian soldier prisoners were treated with disrespect by Japanese soldiers. Those included Hindu, Muslim, Sikh all. I don't know what percentage of them were Rajput Royalties, most foolish and bragging lot of them. 

Similarly, Germans found a way of dealing with captured British Indian soldiers, they offered them with a choice of fighting for them (for them it made sense, If we can fight for British, we can fight for German). So a big part of captured Indian soldiers fought for Germans. 

I had a batchmate from Jaipur, he claimed his great grandmother was grand child of Sawai Madho Singh. He claimed his great grandfather would twist British Indian coin with fingers, and they swung swords of 20 kg plus, spear of 60 kg. I consider all that to be fiction. Like the story of Prithvi Raj Chauhan killing Ghori even after being blinded. These are silly stories. Represents mental state of the narrator. 

Few Indians like Bhagat Singh and Subhash Chandra Bose fought for independence. Most educated Indians who can think, saw British to be God whom we can never match. Our educated Bengali middle class were mostly were wannabe British. Now since we cant do even honest soul searching, we fill up books as if we were all born in families freedom fighters (a lot of freedom fighter pensioners were petty people who disobeyed the existing law in British India and served jails etc., but their acts had no connection with freedom struggle).

I read in a book about India China war:

The setting mocked the headlines. India did not qualify for modern warfare. ‘She, whose only peer was the Holy Roman Empire, she shall rank with Guatemala and Belgium perhaps!’

The news grew worse. There were rumours of Gurkhas sent up to Ladakh armed only with their

knives, and of men flown from the Assam plains to the mountains of NEFA clad only in singlets and tennis-shoes.

But from the politicians there came only speeches, and from the administrator correct regulations. The

famous Fourth Division was cut to pieces; the humiliation of the Indian Army, India’s especial pride, was complete.

If this was the condition after 15 years of independence, then indeed all those 15 years, and years before, were just sleeping and making big mouthing, without action on the ground. Petty countries like Israel with 6 lakh population fought better war with Arab neighbors in 1948. 

Attachment VS Naipaul: India Woulnded Civilization

I was reading somewhere that India alone had more than 4000 Rolls Royce. 

With some of the princes owning 30-40 cars. 

Those princes they studied in London. Had their own cook, chauffeur. 

What do we know about their achievements in science, philosophy, arts? 

High people rode Rolls Royce, big landlords who couldn't afford that, their status was measured by the number of elephants and horses in the stable. 

Each elephant ate produce of 12 bighas of land, mostly sugarcane. On that land poor 100 people can survive.  

They did what was expected from them, what society rewarded. 

Our society did not know science and reason, and had no value for it. 

Still it is same for most people. 

People didn't expect them to do anything like improving governance, building canals etc.

World had changed, syllabus had changed, but people kept expecting same from their rulers: "bhikh".

Even in personal values the syllabus has changed, even if sprit may remain same in many aspects. 

Now Rama and Sita doesn't have to go through the same things,  he/she has to answer a different question paper.

People in one circle might have been lobbying to become the favorite of the ruler. 

These favorites might have been the cause of jealousy among other courtesans, who would have formed different power circles. 

Big landlords would have sought favor of these courtesans, and 

a tiller and worker at the bottom would take landlord as his Mai Baap. 

Where is the place for responsibility or delivery in this cycle? Those were voluntary. 

It can't breed anything other than sycophancy. 

Problem in Achieving Peace in Middle-East

Terrorists are just manifestation of political road-map laid by Quran, Hadith, Sunnah. Which makes it amply clear that anyone who doesn't follow this book has to be intimidated and eliminated.

As long as liberal world  choose not to critically analyze and not show will to fight root cause, terrorism will continue, despite all the peace prayers  which are more a matter of convenience, a need to save oneself from facing the reality.

Muslims willing or  unwilling don't want to rectify their thought process and holy books, which need to be amended in order to provide equal treatment to all Human beings by Islam. If they do then it will not be Islam.

Problems of middle east:

We often hear only Islamic narrative of things, peddled by media. Any rational debate on subject must involve Israeli counterpart as well, but that doesn't happen. 

(1) When Muslims block anyone from entering Mekkah or Madina, miles away. Why don't they respect right of Jews and Christians to their religious sites like Jerusalem, Bathleham, which are not that important to Muslims? Jews and Christians did not leave the places just in peace, they were forced by Arab Muslims. Can one imagine how Muslims will react if Israel today occupies Mekkah?

(2) When all of Arab countries evacuated all Jews in total 1 million or more between 1948 and 1970, killed thousands of Christians which were very predominant in Arab in time of prophet also, why don't they accept Israeli hegemony in Israel? Don't they have right to 20,000 square kilometers?

(3) If Arabs wanted they could have accommodated Palestinians or developed Gaza but they don't. Israel is one thousand times smaller land compared to land area of Muslim countries. Why does it make such ego problem to all Muslim countries of the world?

(4) Arab countries have 70% of worlds oil Resources, The amount they spend on promoting Jihad against Jews, If they spend 10% of that on people of Gaza, life will be very good and they may not insist on jihad and killing, but Arabs are not saddened by plight of Gaza but they are saddened by existence of Jews.

(4) Should Israel lay arm and get killed in their rocket attacks? get their women raped and kids butchered? Don't they have right to self defense and existence? All attacks they do are necessitated by self defense.

(5) This pattern reflects every where, they eliminated every single hindu, Buddhis, Sikh, Jain religious site in Indian continent.

(6) Why do Palestinians provide shield to Hamas launching sites  despite warning from Israeli that they will be firing a particular launching site?

(7) Why do they don't ask Hamas  to make peace and stop attacking Israel? Why  Hamas insists on eliminating Jews?

(8) Suppose Arabs succeed in killing every Jew in Israel, will Jew hatred will stop? No never, It predates creation of Israel, Koran is full of Versus with Jew Hatred. It started in Madina in 6 AD. Only thing will happen is that Muslims will find another excuse. Reminds me of riots in India, always they say Quran was desecrated. Nobody gives a shit to Quran still.

(9) Palestinian Arabs are not from ancient Palestine but from Arab root. 

No prophet or Koran can encroach on our right to believe the way we want. 

One YouTube video, one Israeli guy says "Gandhi was not Jewish......to tell the truth, if Gandhi had laid himself in front of an Arab tank, instead of a British tank, you know the only thing would have been left was his lion-cloth. "

He was right, only thing that was left to Hindus in Pakistan, Bangladesh, Kashmir was lion-cloth. They didn't care for Gandhi. 

This green shade is amount of land Muslims have. And they claim they are fighting against Israeli occupation. They have occupied holiest of Jewish religious site, Temple Mount and built mosque over there. And Muslims claim they are fighting for justice. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hamas had made a base in this building below, destroyed by IDF on 15 May, during 2021 war....Al Jazeera, Associate Press and other news agencies had chosen to be their Human Shield! How can we expect media to be impartial? Several thousands of media outlets use AP material directly

https://twitter.com/AskAnshul/status/1393801108661800963

Read this article to understand how Associated Press reports on Israel. It’s  a long article but very detailed first person account.

https://t.co/Fos5ukxfgj?amp=1

"To make sense of most international journalism from Israel, it is important first to understand that the news tells us far less about Israel than about the people writing the news."

"In these circles, in my experience, a distaste for Israel has come to be something between an acceptable prejudice and a prerequisite for entry. "

"The AP staff in Gaza City would witness a rocket launch right beside their office, endangering reporters and other civilians nearby—and the AP wouldn’t report it, not even in AP articles about Israeli claims that Hamas was launching rockets from residential areas."

"Cameramen waiting outside Shifa Hospital in Gaza City would film the arrival of civilian casualties and then, at a signal from an official, turn off their cameras when wounded and dead fighters came in, helping Hamas maintain the illusion that only civilians were dying."

"The current spokesman at the UN agency for Palestinian refugees in Gaza, for example, is a former BBC man. A Palestinian woman who participated in protests against Israel and tweeted furiously about Israel a few years ago served at the same time as a spokesperson for a UN office."

"..........with Yazidis, Christians, and Kurds falling back before the forces of radical Islam not far away from here, this ideology’s local franchise launched its latest war against the last thriving minority in the Middle East."

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Schools: Google it, “ UNRWA CONDEMNS PLACEMENT OF ROCKETS, FOR A SECOND TIME, IN ONE OF ITS SCHOOLS”

Hamas put rockets inside US run schools. Media never shows it. 

Human shield strategy: How to use children to fight? The teaching to die for religion in the text book that teaching at school in order to take “Jerusalem”. This why they willing to use children in the frontline. here:

"Examples of content found in Palestinian school books include references to violence, martyrdom and terror,"

Media only shows Bombarding of buildings, not telling that it was Hamas rocket launching site, and that Israel gave them sufficient time to evacuate the building. Even cameramen often have very good amount of time to film well. 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

16 May 2021: Slogans shouted by mobs in London: 'death to Jews'. 

Cars festooned with Palestinian flags are going through heavily Jewish neighborhoods of London with loudspeakers blaring, "F*ck the Jews. Fuck their mothers, Rape their daughters."

https://twitter.com/gunnerpunner/status/1393920559243829248

On 15th May 2021, a pro-Palestinian rally in Belgium shouts "Death to the Jews". 

Under these conditions Israel is only more legitimate, else they will have no place on the earth. 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Indian politicians never opened mouth for Hindus in Kashmir, Pakistan and Bangladesh. Nor for Yazidis, Kurds, Christians in the middle east. 

In 1999, in the fist sitting of Loksabha, first topic to be raised was topic of Israel Palestine, by Communists. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

While  Israel confers honorary Israeli citizenship on Soumya Santhosh, Indian national killed in Hamas firing from Gaza. Kerala CM did not even name Hamas, rocket, Palestine. No elected representatives from Kerala even visited her family. Political parties spoke on Palestine but not on her. 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

While  A Pakistani member of Parliament was giving anti Jewish speech, quoting and praising Hitler. And all the other members of Parliament clapped. 

A rally in UK

How convenient it is, that so called liberals say 99 days that terrorism has no religion and that one day when Israel retaliates, Muslims say Jews are terrorist and so called liberals stay silent. 

Who was friend of British, Savarkar or Gandhi/Congress?

No indian politician had as many close friends among British as Gnadhi and second would be Nehru.

Gandhi helped British during Boer wars.

Gandhi (fifth from left, middle row) with members of the Indian ambulance corps during second Boer war.

Gandhi supported British Empire during first world war, gave call to Indian youth to enrol in British Army.

Savarkar served harsh imprisonment in Andman, where as Gandhi and Nehru were jailed to guest house type prisons.

Gandhi never took such acts which Savarkar did, so Gnadhi was in permanent agreement with Brits, like most people.

H G Wells writes that British mostly found Gandhi to be very useful person, who would not let events go violent and out of control.

Congress Party

Congress party was founded by a British Civil Servant Allan Octavian Hume, with the aim to create a platform for dialogue between Indians and British. The 4th, 5th, 10th, 20th, 26th, and 33rd president of Congress were British. Congress did not demand Indian independence till end of World War I. Congress cooperated with British governments, and their demands were usually limited to more rights like representation in British parliament, granting British citizenship to all Indians etc. 

Can we say Congress was playing fiddle of British? 

In 1946, Nehru accepted to work in Viceroys council as a minister, then he took oath of loyalty in the name of King George VI, calling him emperor of India.  Savarkar never took oath of loyalty to British. 

Even today so called liberal politicians, routinely invoke foreign powers, write to American Congress to intervene in internal matters of India, to defeat BJP. Did not Jaichand and Man Singh do the same? 

60 MPs signed the letter to Barack Obama, asking him to deny visa to Modi Ji when he was chief minister. 

Iqbal wrote couplets in the praise of Queen Victoria.  Will Congress blame Iqbal? Most of the freedom fighters were Hindu and Sikh, barring some exceptions. Muslim League worked and cooperated with British system. Have you known about any Movement of Muslims League against British? After Independence Pakistan was became full fledged ally of UK and USA, partner of NATO. Almost all Muslims voted for creation of Pakistan in 1946. RSS, Savarkar opposed partition, Congress accepted partition. But Congress and Indian leftists are busy spreading rumors about Savarkar and RSS, claiming Muslims to be patriot. Owaisi Razakars worked with British, Jinnah, those Muslims who signed Shimla agreement worked with British, not Savarkar. 

Leftists had signed mercy petition for Afjal Guru, slogans were shouted in JNU "Kitne Afjal maroge Har ghar se Afjal nilega.." But they have courage to raise fingers at Savarkar. 

Nizam of Hyderabad was an staunch supporter of British during 1857 rebellion, which won him a lot of British favor, which continued till pre 1947. All Nizams of Hyderabad remained pro British. These guns were specially prepared for him by British companies. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MDYtxxRU_cY

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Even Peiyar went against Gandhi and Congress. Was Periyar terrorist? Ambedkar and many other eminent Dalit thinkers including Kanshi Ram thought that "राजनितिक परिवर्तन से पहले सामाजिक और आर्थिक परिवर्तन जरुरी है, अंग्रेजो को निकलने से पहले हमें समाज व्यवस्था और अर्थ व्यवस्था को सुधारना चाहिए "

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WcW0whf0Py8

 "There is something called strategy to come out of prison. How can it be termed as surrender or mercy?" ‘Does he (Rahul Gandhi) have stature to talk about Savarkar?’. 

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

Gandhi asked Hindus in Muslim majority areas to give up their life, so that it will bring peace, it will change the heart of neighbors. 

Gandhi made similar request to Jews that they should walk to gas chambers themselves. 

Gandhi was not behaving like a responsible politician. Gandhi was an irresponsible person. 

A person who is asking a community to surrender itself to mass slaughter, is not speaking from a position of responsibility at the very least. 

__________________________________________________________________________________________________

How many times Rahul Gandhi, Kejriwal, etc have apologized in court? 

Mahatma Gandhi, Sardar Patel and Bal Gangadhar Tilak petitioned the government for his release. It is true that towards the end of his term in the Andamans, he requested the British to grant him amnesty.

https://www.news18.com/opinion/opinion-if-rahul-gandhi-can-apologise-to-supreme-court-in-rafale-case-what-stops-him-from-doing-so-now-7478905.html

In 1924, Savarkar was such a threat to British even after 14 year of rigorous imprisonment, that they kept him confined in Ratnagiri for 13 more years. But the same British allowed Nehru-Gandhi to move freely across India, even facilitating their travel to UK. Even the British knew who was a threat & who were sepoys. British kept Savarkar in detention for 27 years because they knew his ideas posed the sharpest threat to their rule. British stand vindicated today as the ideological roots he laid even under imprisonment have grown for a 100 years into the Hindutva movement ruling India today. But British let Nehru & Gandhi roam freely around the nation as they knew they were pets on a leash that could be pulled back anytime. Not just India, they even travelled to UK. Only freedom fighters in human history to travel to the occupier nation under their full protection. 

they say savarkar mafi ...

how many times rahul gandhi has asked maafi request in court to RSS

rahul gandhi and kejriwal both

Savarkar was being punished for a crime which was not a crime. But leftists they wanted that, and the fact that he came out is disliked. He spent 14 years in prison and 13 years in house arrest. Which other politician stood that much? 

Gujarat Missing Facts

1. They killed 60 karsevaks.
2. During riots most people killed in police action were Hindus, and many Hindu died in riots also.
3. Muslims again took revenge by killing Hindus in Akshardham, yes, every terrorist act is a riot by Muslim, because it takes hundreds and thousands of people to execute such acts.

4. They killed Haren Pandya, the then Home minister and close aide of Modi. They attempted to kill even Modi. Then they put all the blame of death of Haren Pandya on Modi. In 2019, now supreme court has rejected the plea of all nine accused. All 12 accused in murder were muslim, and they (same people) also attempted to kill VHP leader  Jagdish Tewari. 

5. Lalu formed unconstitutional Banerjee commission to give clean cheat to Muslims. It was declared unconstitutional later on. 

Here is how the may baap of Indian secular jamat Rahat Indori was spreading hatred and inciting mobs on Gujrat....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W2vZbBKXLiY

Nanavati commission has held it. In February 2011, the trial court convicted 31 people. Trial court gave death penalty to 11 people. The convictions were based on the murder and conspiracy provisions of Sections 302 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code respectively and under Sections 149, 307, 323, 324, 325, 326, 332, 395, 397, and 436 of the Code and some sections of the Railway Act and Police Act. The death penalty was awarded to 11 convicts; those believed to have been present at a meeting held the night before the incident where the conspiracy was formed, and those who, according to the court, had actually entered the coach and poured petrol before setting it afire.

In October 2017, all the 31 accused who were convicted earlier in 2011 by the SIT court were given life imprisonment. 

But still a part of media and so called liberals say it was accident. They don't respect court judgement and facts. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=out9PjVC5_4

When police used to go for arresting main culprits of Godhara carnage, Muslims of Godhara always attacked police. They did not let police arrest the Godhara culprits. Many accused were never caught. 

It happens everywhere that police can't enter Muslim areas, for the fear of getting attacked. 

After Gujarat riots, Akshardham Temple was attacked in Gandhinagar, 60 people died. A bus full of Gujarati people doing tirth of Amarnath were attacked in Srinagar, killing more than dozen. To kill Modi, many terrorist groups planned and sent squads. His home minister Hiren Pandya was killed. And all this was done in religious hate against Hindus. But all of this was never reported by media as any danger and with any significance. 

The 2008 Ahmedabad bombings were a series of 21 bomb blasts that hit Ahmedabad, India, on 26 July 2008, within a span of 70 minutes. Fifty-six people were killed and over 200 people were injured. First blast happened in Maninagar which Modi represented in assembly. Several TV channels said they had received an e-mail from a terror outfit called Indian Mujahideen claiming responsibility for the terror attacks. First series of blast took place in various parts of the city, then second series took place in hospitals after two hours, so that those who are brought in injured condition, those who come to see them are killed. Many died in Hospital. Bombs were kept on cycles, and cycles were parked where people buy vegetable etc. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yM_sCVKUP0Q

On 18 February 2022, 38 convicts sentenced to death, 11 to life imprisonment.

These perpetrators are from all different parts of India. 8 of them were from UP, one was SP leader on a position. 

No of Liberals communists intellectuals condemning and calling out Ahmedabad bomb blast Convicts : 0

No of Liberals communists intellectuals condemned Hindutva goons chanting Jai shree ram in front of hijab girl : 50000

This proves that Hindu terrorism is real.

In 2006 Bomb blast took place in Sankat Mochan temple in Varanasi, killing 28 injuring more than 100. Akhilesh Yadav when he came in government in 2013, got Shamim Ahmed, accused released. SP was about to get many other terror accused released, which was quashed by court.  

Agar Haj se aane wale kisi plain ko Hindu dharma wale gher ke aag laga kar sabhi logo ko jinda jala de to bhi ye media yahi bolegi? 

Patna Blast (2013) blame was also put on Modi: Modi jahan jaega danga karaega. While it was done by Muslims. 

https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/2013-patna-blast-accused-who-escaped-from-custody-arrested-after-10-years-4053835

Mamta Banerjee calls Godhra accident BJP ki sajish. She did same on CAA NRC, that it is meant to take away nationality of Muslims. "Godhra incident kaun kiya tha? Kaise aag jalaya tha? wo to running train me aag jala diya tha.." Despite conviction of Muslims who burnt alive 58 Hindus in Godhra, she asks how it caught fire.

https://www.opindia.com/2024/09/wikipedia-court-order-not-a-reliable-source-teesta-setalvad-bias-2002-godhra-train-attack/

Lest we forget why Kamlesh Tiwari spoke about Moahmmed

Media will never tell you the part that Kamlesh Tiwari was reacting to speech by Ajama Khan who had said, RSS people are bachelor because they are Gay, they sex among themselves.

While Kamlesh Tiwari was sent to jail, nothing ever happened to Akabaruddin owaisi who abused Rama and Kaushilya, who regularly abused Hindu dieties.

Mulslims rioted in Malda west bengal, burning Hindu shops and property.

At-least tens of different Muslim seminaries issued death Fatwa against Kamlesh Tiwari.

In several places they held protests asking his death, including my hometown Bihar Sharif, Indore, Bhopal, Jabalpur.

While no Muslim ever got punished, no rioters got punished, neither Ajam Khan, Owaisi brothers, none.

Narendra Modi was and is on the hit list of terrorists and Muslims, group after group were caught by police and ATS after 2002. Media spread so much hatred against him, that he could be killed any moment if he had not been Chief Minister.

Swamy Shradhand was killed the same way, killer came as a seeker wanting answer to some questions. This time Killers wore saffron clothes. Gandhi ji applauded the killer as Hero, british govt hanged the killer, else Gandhi would have given him Bharat Ratna after independence?

One arya samaj leader reacted to muslim pamphlets which depicted Sita as prostitute and gave account of Moahmmeds many marriages, Muslims killed him in 1927.

They can always do that and it will be called Freedom of expression, when we react it is blasphemy.

Godhara riots were started by Muslims, by burning 60 Hindus, but after riots escalated and more muslims died compared to Hindus, they took revenge by attacking on Akshardham temple killing 76 people.

Mumbai riots were started by Muslims, but when the Bomb blast happened in 1993, media justified the terrorist act as revenge.

Important to note that Jamat e Ulema e Hind is fighting the case fore murderers of Kamlesh Tiwari. That shows that killers have support of Indian Muslims.

___________________________________________________________________________________

Dadri Akhlaq 2015

Same way people forgot about why Akhlak thing happened. He stole a calf, slaughtered it and fed beef to Rajputs in the village, after some of them teased him for Dawat (not knowing that it was beef). 

On 28 September 2015 evening, one of Ikhlaq's neighbors allegedly accused him of stealing and slaughtering his missing calf. 

...............Same people who killed Akhlaq had consumed meat at bunch of people who killed Akhlaq had consumed meat at his residence two days earlier. 

Bakrid was on September 25, a day after Bakrid on September 26, neighborhood boys came to Mohammad Akhlaq’s home and teased him on why he never treated them to a ‘dawaat’. His wife said “Unhone saamne se bola, toh inhone khilaya" “Pehle unke ghar gosht khaya. .........". 

Most people in that village Dadri are vegetarian. There is no meat shop. 

https://punemirror.indiatimes.com/news/india/friends-coaxed-victim-to-serve-meat-then-turned-against-him-says-cleric/articleshow/49187613.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst

Mohd Akhlaq was seen killing calf, says petition filed by Dadri villagers

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UOWUYLkEp4k

Petition filed by family of Hindu villagers said: Akhlak had stolen and slaughtered a calf, there were eye witnesses.

.........pictures of the legs of a calf and its head were circulated in whatsapp. 

 

But media everywhere reported "for storing and consuming beef". How would media have reacted of some Hindu fed pork to many Muslims? There have been several riots in India when some pig from Dalit Basti strayed into Muslim area in UP, Muslims attacked and killed police. 

It was Akhilesh Yadav's government, police and media colluded to make it anti Hindu narrative. By first denying that there was any meat, then getting a report from vet telling meat in Akhlaq house was mutton, later it was  another lab in Mathura for a conclusive test, as per which meat was beef. How can a vet be authorized in first place? 

Ravi Sisodia, 18 year old accused died in Jail (was in jail for one year), police made it Kidney failure, his family said he was killed in jail. How many people have kidney failure at age of 18? He was not given benefit of being Juvenile, like Mohammed Afroz, the rapist who inserted rod in Nirbhaya's genitals. There is a parallel, some of the Gujarat riots accused Hindus were lethally beaten by Muslims in Jail. 

Akhlaq's family was given 1 crore compensation and four flats. 

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/lucknow/up-to-give-akhlaqs-family-four-flats-in-noida/articleshow/49435244.cms

When many people of Bihar were killed by terrorists in Kashmir in October 2021, their dead bodies were burned in Srinagar without informing the families, and families were sent 1 25000 compensation.

Reminds me of 1981 riots in Bihar Sharif. Muslim victims were given govt job, house, money. Hindu victims received almost no compensation. 

________________________________________________________________________________________

Jan 2022: Kishan Boliya was lynched. 

His crime, he shared a video which showed this. 

25 जनवरी को धंधुकी में शब्बीर ने किशन भरवाड़ की सोशल मीडिया पर ईशनिंदा वीडियो पोस्ट करने के लिए गोली मारकर हत्या कर दी थी। किशन ने एक वीडियो में ईशनिंदा वाली वीडियो क्लिप शेयर करने के लिए माफी भी मांगी थी। 

Modus Operandi of Hindu haters

Somethings are common.

1. They start with character assassination of Hindu leaders like Savarkar, Modi. They create mistrust, once some persons character has been maligned, you cant trust them, hence you wont try to investigate or read or verify about them. They attack the link, the line of communication. We only listen to those whom we trust.

2. All means are used to attack Hindus without exposing themselves, eg attack on cast system, attack on Brahmans, attack on Hindu festivals. All means are used to make Hindus feel ashamed about themselves, so that they never raise head. Remember leftist attack on Brahmans is not meant to reform Hindus but to destroy Hindus. Since Brahmans also stand of a lot of what Hinduism represents and Brahmans make an easy target, Muslims and leftists attack Brahmans. Similarly festivals like Holi and Diwali are attacked. They don't care for environment, it is just a tool for them to attack Hindus.

3. Some people had asked about RSS. RSS had sued Rahul Gandhi for labelling false allegation.

There is freedom to speak anything and RSS cant sue each and every journalist. Rahul Gandhi had sort of apologized, then only RSS dropped the case. If there are evidence that RSS gives armed training or anything like that, then those people should approach court, instead of spreading rumors in the name of freedom of speech. I have not seen a single such thing, not even knife training anywhere in RSS, in 10  years of RSS life. Even in Gandhi Ji murder case, court had given clean cheat and not found any involvement of RSS. But spread a rumor million times that becomes truth. But such truth only works in social media not in the court. Like liberals calling Lalu a mesiha. But Lalu was imprisoned when it was Devegowdas govt. Not BJP. And opinions have no validity in the court. 

to be continued...