Friday, June 19, 2015

1000 Years of Muslim Rule on India Was Period of Slavery

1. 1000 years of Muslim rule was real slavery. No different from the way Africans were treated by Europeans. 

2. How can a rule in which ruling class considers themselves alien arab, persian(even though they were mostly forcible Hindu converts), whose loyatly was with Mekkah and Ummah be Indian? How can a rule which treats 90% population as enemy, be self rule? 

3. During muslim rule there was apartheid. 
During Muslim rule a Hindu farmer would pay half of his produce as tax, then Jajiya, then tax for using Ganga Ghats. Pay tax when a kid is born. While muslim farmer will pay a quarter, one tenth or sometimes they were not required to pay at all. That money was used to raze indian institutions, temples and build mosques, minars on top of it. Very few people know that Shahjehan cut the hands of all 20,000 artisans after finishing Tajmahel. 

4. Only secular muslim was Dara Sikoh, But ask to change the name of Aurangjeb road to Dara Sikoh road, or Aurangabad to Darabad, muslims will cry everywhere. For them Aurangjeb is their role model. Ibrahim Khan Gardy was also secular muslim in Maratha army, he was killed brutaly by Abdali after Panipat when he refused to say kalama in arabic, because he used to say it in marathi.

5. 1761 Panipat battle between Maratha and Afghans, all muslim Nababs sent their armies to fight for afghans. This shows their loyalty.

6. During freedom struggle Hindu were fighting for independence of India but muslims were rioting against Hindus to establish Khilafat in turkey.  Neither Jinnah, nor Aga Khan, nor Liakat Ali Khan ever went to jail because they were not interested in Indian Independence. Their were interested in Turkey, creating Islamic nation. Abul Kalam Ajad was exception but he didnot get a single muslim reserved seat for Congress, not even 5% of Muslim voted Congress in muslim reserved seats. 

5. 1945 elections and 1946 elections all muslims of present Inida voted to create Pakistan. Pakistan was demanded mostly by muslims of Bihar, UP, Punjab, MP, Bengal, Hyderabad. But after partion they stayed here, those very muslims who had done massacre of Hindus in Kolkata 16-18 august 1946, they started talking differently overnight after 15 august 1947. 
This questioned was asked by Sardar Patel himself, who was only person (apart from Purrushottam Das Tondon inside Congress cabinet of ministers) to have courage to speak the truth.


1945-1946 Elections, Who voted for separate nation Pakistan?

Offcourse their loyalty did not change, they still celebrate Pakistan victory in cricket. They kill every non-muslim in kashmir and they shelter Bangladeshi Muslims. It was Indian muslims, Jamindars, Nabbas, Ulemas, who said they cant live in a democratic set up with other Indians, because they were not one of us they considered themselves as rulers of India, foreigners, so they needed a separate nation from Indians. . 

6. Muslims were first people in India who didnot consider themselves Hindu. The word which connects a man to glory and past of the land of Sindhus. Loyalty of a muslim is not with India, they hate Indian language, Indian culture, Indian Heros, Indian scholars, Indian History everything. Their role model is foreign invaders who raped their mothers and put them in their harems, who converted their ancestors on tip of sword. Have u ever heard a muslim keeping any indian name? any language. They use arabic name. Show me  example where muslim shows respect for Indian history which is not Islamic, which is from before 712. Their nation is Islamic Arabic, they wish they were Arabs. Show me a single muslim religious stuff where they use any Indian language, cultural symbol. They use persian, afghan but not Indian. They will use English, French but not Indian language. They adopt western etiquettes but anything Indian is something that must be hated. Westerners, Europeans no other civilization is so much hateful to Indian roots, Indian people, Indian culture as Muslim invaders inspired in themselves and among newly converts. 

7. During 1000 years of muslim rule muslims destroyed 6 great univerities of India and the world, all temples of North India, including Ram janmbhumi, krishna, and Kashi Wivshawanath. Can u believe how come in the land where Hindus there is not a single temple in north India more than 300-400 years old? Because each and every symbol of Hindus were destroyed. Hindus were kept alive just to work in fields and fill their coffers. Just as a farmer need bull muslim rulers needed Hindus. 

8. India exists for 5000 years atleast, country was not made by Congress or Nehru, Country was made by our rishis, heros like Rama, Krishna, Ashoka, Buddha, Nanak, Shivaji. Our people who worked in the field, who wrote Vedas, who wrote smritis, puranas, who gave message of 'ekam sat viprah bahudha vadanti'. Every one who adapted to Indian culture /heritage and contributed to it in his/her own way. Muslim envaders didnot adapt or contribute, they maintained separate identity from Indians. They sought to annihilate it. And majority of their India born progeny  seeks to do it till this day. Kashmir is latest example. 

9. 200 years of british rule was much better. In Britsh rule there was police, justice courts etc. You can build temples, schools everything. Once a British Ploice officer said to Premchand after he wrote soje watan"Thank the God it is British rule and u have just been called in police station for writing against govt, If it were rule of Mughals by this time you would have lost your both hands". But coward Hindus as aways for 1400 years or so did not ever mustered courage to say a word against Muslim atrocities during british rule which were more than British atrocities, You count it, in malabar, kohat, comilla every year there were riots  in british India and muslims willing to finish Hindus. Check names of remote Indian villages in UP, MP and Bihar, which were under Muslim Jamindars, most of them have arabic names, Haidarpur, Shultanpur, Mohiuddinpur etc. 

10. You go to a Muslim, to ask his boy or girl for wedding and without you converting to Islam. In 99% case he will marry his child to a Arab, an African Muslim but not to a Hindu, so much hatred for Indian-ness. 

11. Show me a single example when a Muslim ruler married their girl to Hindu king? They married to arabs, turks, persians. And they forced Hindus to give their daughters or face death. Rajputs of Rajasthan sent their daughters to Akbars harem to save their masses. Else like Akbar did slaughter of all men, child, old in Chittaur. 

12. In every attack or fight, after the fight they used to kill entire population even after 500-600 years stay in India. Vijaynagar, Chittaur ask it. Can you expect Indians to commit genocide of Indians? Can anyone show me example where British sought to commit genocide on population, to destroy temple, university etc? Did British attack Somanath, Ayodhya, Kashi, Mathura?  Or Kanishka did it? Or ever Ashoka/ Vikramaditya killed innocent farmers of Kalinga? Or do any Muslim king ever killed muslim population of opponent after war? It was always reserved for non-muslim Indians. Almost every loosing battle in Rajasthan, Gwalior, Malwa meant Indians have to beahead their wemen folk, kids, and olds, to save them from getting raped and tortured. Those who were not so brave to behead, they used to ask them to take poison or jump into the wells. Latest happened in Rajauri in 1947 before rumour spread that pakistani are going to take on the city. 2000-3000 wemen made a fire and jumped into it. Even worst foreigners didnot dare to commit such atrocities. 

13. A guest comes and starts living with you may become your family. A person who comes robs and goes off is foreigner. But a person who comes forcibly into your house, rapes your family and then asks you to bow to his own folks in another house, makes u slave in your own house is not a guest he is enemy, worst than foreigner. 

14. British played divide and rule as a foreigner, but they were just using Muslim desire to contain other Indians. Muslim invaders created worst divide among Indian people, a divide which laid foundation of complete separation from Indianess, Indian values. A rule which created the most Hindu/India hating culture. They created a class of converts with a view that anything which has Indian roots must be opposed and hated in persuasion of making Arabic ideology rule the land of India. India for them is a peace of land which must be conquered and made subservient to Arabic interests without any question. They loved this peace of land, they loved the slaves, harem women nothing more. If you give chance to evil people of all world to do so every one will come here and stay there. Do they become Indian? Do 20 million bangladeshi Muslims become Indian by staying in India? Just 60 years ago they led biggest bloodshed during partition in Noakhali, Kolkata, MaymenSingh to create Islamic Republic of Pakistan and even now they commit atrocities on Hindus/Buddhist/Christians any non-muslims. Muslims of India were calling Kings of Afghanistan, Iran and Arabs during british rule to attack India and create rule of Islam here again, to get rid of impending Hindu rule(they considered democracy as Hindu rule). Who created this chasm in India? Who planted these seeds of separation? Muslim invaders offcourse. Not Huns, Sak and other tribes. They came and became one with us.

15. Muslim invaders are national Heroes of Pakistan, because that nation is formed on the basis of Hindu hatred, India hatred, India, Hindu, Sikh, Jain, Buddhist, any culture which is Indian is napak so they created Pakistan. Do you think we Indians ourselves also hate India to have such common views on nationality and we should also hate ourselves and surrender to become Islamic Republic of Pakistan? Pakistanis come to see delhi qutub minar which Quttubuddin built after demolishing 27 Indian temples and he put heads of thousands of Indian warriors in the plinth, such nationalism is Indian symbol? Off course people who sided with Abdali the afghan invader who returned back to afghanistan after taking 2 lakh hosatage Hindu wemen children for them Abdali, Gauri, Bin Qasem, Hejjaj all are Indian, despite the fact that Abdali returned to afghanistan, Gauri too returned leaving his slaves to rule India Ghulam Wansh, Hejjaj was Iraqui returned to Iraq, Nadir Shah was Irani returned to Iran, still they are Heroes and Indian! For a muslim India is his jagir and belongs to Ummah. Whole world is their jagir given to them by Allah so in that sense they claim India. 

16. Islam doesnot believe in nationality, every non-muslim is not to be treated as equal human, there is only one nation that is ummah, muslims living in different countries have only one brotherhood loyalty that is to ummah. Muslims of India(including Pakistan as pak is also India) have shown it over and over. Islam asks to kill apostates, brothers if he disobeys Islam, how can we non-muslim Indians be same nation, are we bigger than apostate brothers? Indian nation majority of which are not to be considered even human, but enemies as per Islam which is always above anything, why do you claim to be part of it? Just to blow dust in our eyes until you completely annihilate us?  Or you just want to lay claim as rulers ? Nation doesn't belong to rulers, it belongs to masses who have a connection and feeling for nation, a willingness to suffer for it. 

17. Can anyone show me a single muslim majority area which has wanted to stay with India, Hyderabad muslims built Rajkar army to kill rape and rule over 90% Hindus of Hyderabad state. Kashmir. Pakistan, Bangladesh. Is it magic that when you are small in numbers you become Indian? Why does this magic disappear when muslims intentionally and repeatedly asked during 1906 to 1947 for separate state as they said they dont feel as a nation with Indian majority? But after taking a separate nation, muslims conveniently said they are with India so that they can claim more land in future. Rule of Muslim invaders which created such traitors cant be Indian rule. 
If British had stayed 500 years more and made us Christians or kind of people whose loyalty lies with queen of England on the tip of gun barrel, would have made a portion of population blood thirsty and anti-Indian in every aspect, for whom History would have started from British East India company , will you be willing to call such a rule as Indian rule? Now you change British with Muslims, now your opinion changes. Because now you are really afraid of honest opinion out of fear. 

18. A question to Indian non-muslims who argue opposite to me and try to find many other reasons. Do you do it with logical conviction or out of fear, convenience, habit for sycophancy or you just because you are not concerned you debate it as time pass, or over the time you have thought in a illogical way and now logic hurts your ego?
I have a blog to answer such type of people also. 
Hindu Liberalism: Facade to Cover Dishonesty

Don't ever expect a Muslim to accept truth or honest debate. Their faith is hurt by a single truth. 

I will debate with any Muslim who first accepts that their ancestors were Hindu, that Muslim atrocity on Indians was wrong, that Muslim rule on India was wrong and creation of Pakistan was wrong. Before this no debate. You cannot act in accordance with two nation theory, maintain two separate identity and still say you respect secularism, India. This is throwing dust in open eyes. And if you feel you are very powerful, you don't need to respect Indian identity. Then obviously no debate. 

For those who dont understand the nuisance of religion apartheid and wish to understand it.
'Religion' is Apartheid and Flawed Western/Islamic concept

I will conclude with one line, fear of truth is pervades most of humans, regardless of race, nation and apartheid called religion.

Sunday, May 31, 2015

Right way for a noble Hindu

Muslim population is surging in India, my assessment says there will be 1 billion muslims and 1.5 billion Hindus in India at 2100. The way we are doing things cant work.

Entire humanity has shown me one fact, root cause of all evil; cowardliness.

I am Indian born Hindu nationalist. Since childhood, I have seen how Muslims bully Hindus and how Hindus do sycophancy to save themselves. There are many aspects of the problem.

If one assess Muslim brain, they they all have a heart of pea,  fear of truth is very high in Muslims, westerners, Christians and Hindus all. Look into heart of a terrorist, he doesn't have courage to face the truth, he cant suffer the whole life voluntarily. They need opium of Jannat to die, to escape misery of truth. Biggest fear of Muslim in Indian continent is Vedas, Geeta and science, a muslim brain fears he will be in  misery once he does non-biased analysis of the facts of Vedas or science. A muslim will never show for an honest debate, he will always hide behind anger and aggression.

A Christian doesnot have courage to read any non-biblical book.


Biggest fear of an western atheist is material illusion; atheists are mostly hedonist cowards. They see only solution of all problems as not to bother about anything, no responsibility towards humanity or any living being, no reason to take on their sensual illusion.

A Hindu doesn't have courage to look inside his heart and ask is he honest in his prayers to lord Krishna. (By the way I don't believe Krishna was a God. For me he was just a noble man who lead by example. I go by facts how much hurtful it may be.). Fear of poverty, fear of society, fear of Muslims, fear of everything. that's how Hindu doesn't improve. A Hindu doesn't look to a poor untouchable Hindu, a Hindu doesn't have courage to look at Pakistani, Bangladeshi Hindu. A hindu fears poverty more than his self-respect, a Hindu fears ignominy, loneliness, a Hindu fears being mocked. Can we accept the mockery? Can we swallow insult?   After-all insult is illusion and saving oneself from insult is a form of greed.

I study psychology, and I see how reptilian human brain works and how frontal cortex, rational brain works.  I understand illusion is real. Illusion is everywhere.

Only solution to all problems as I see, which is most simple but most difficult: the way Modi lead us, the way Vivekananda lead us, the way Maharana Pratap lead us, the way ancient Rishis lead us, embracing truth and killing sensual pleasures and bias of brain. It may require critical non-biased thinking at sometime, killing the sleep and all pleasures at other times, but not evading the truth, not evading the pain all the time.

If goal of a noble human is truth then only way to reach it is fearless acceptance of truth and reason.

If there is any God, he will choose the bravest, who stops his tears in all miseries and accepts all miseries.

If there is no God still one doesn't loose anything,  after-all we all will pass after few years. we are all soil and air then afterwards.



Sunday, May 3, 2015

Hindu Liberalism: A Façade and Ignorance

देश लूटता रहा, हम सब अपने ही देश को लूटते रहे  और इल्जाम हमेशा औरो पर लगाया
Fear due to lack of unity should not be sugarcoated as tolerance.

India may go peaceful, may become developed but until we cure this disease, India will again collapse. We have been hobbling between good times and collapse for 1400 years. Even if we were doing well, we still should have addressed this problem.

Root cause of problems of India is not Muslim invaders or British, It is Hindus. Any foreign hand will always find enough hands and brain to do anything for them. Foreign hand changes time to time, Muslim, British, Congress.

Often I see Indians telling Indians or foreigners, how proud they are of their culture, how much it shapes their daily life, character. This is something unbearable for me, having seen all sorts of attrition. Hindus are more materialistic than any other community, but they always pretend otherwise.

One cannot find more than handful of Muslim in Indian continent who will act as a sycophant to appease a Hindu. But in-spite of historical events, present realities, you can always turn up most of Hindu individuals against Hindus.

Hindu are liberal and sane in religious views, but that is not the complete picture.

Three types of people constitute silent spectators on the site of a murder: an ultra-liberal, complicit and a coward. But it is difficult to distinguish among these three as they all pretend to be liberal.

Can you find a more than handful of Bureaucrats, or Govt officials who are willing to give up on a chance to earn bribe? Go to a police station in India, you will die of uttering request to behave and register FIR, but they wont register FIR unless you pay some bribe, they wont behave if you are a poor. Very same people, wont misbehave when 5-6 Muslim boys come to file  FIR.

http://blogs.economictimes.indiatimes.com/headon/indian-asphyxiation-service-ias/

I haven't slaughtered a mouse, but suppose my neighbours attack my brother, my family. Few times I will cry, feel helpless but after a while when crying doesn't work, i will go to police, if that also doesnot work, i will myself make spears, buy gun. However if I dont love my family, I wont ever react. I will be liberal, which Hindu are.

How come these people become liberal, when the house of neighbour is attacked, when Hindus are raped and massacred in some other part? They simply don't care. If you call it liberalism, then you are misleading yourself as it happens in most of cases.

Cast system in present India is equally convenient moral dishonesty. A Jat or Rajput boy will most often brag about his cast, pretend bravery. A Brahman will most of time claim some other honour. Everyone wants to grab whatever stature they can grab for free. But that bravery doesn't go beyond that. I have found most often Rajput and high cast Hindus or Yadavs who are firmly united to beat a Dalit, they don't even attempt to resist a Muslim assault, they don't want to risk themselves. They don't care simply, as long as there is fun, they participate together. Moment there is time for payback, they show their true colour. Reddies of Andhra, Vokaligga, Lingayats everywhere there are cast lobbies, and basis of cast lobby is not the cast system, it is just a tool to get a share in loot, just like employee associations.

Try to grab one inch of land from your neighbour, they will show you what they can do. Same people didn't whisper when country was partitioned. Brahmans who form 50% of judges in court, majority in media, and elite clubs. They will be ever ready to show their liberalism, for Muslims, they didn't whisper when entire Kashmiri Pandit population was uprooted within 24 hrs, women abducted, child butchered. They were busy proving these are act of rebellion, act of few Muslims who have misunderstood Islam (as if they know more about Islam than Muslims). Even more than that if they have had done right thing, Kashmiri pundits wouldn't have been with them in their fight for legitimate demands. Kashmiri Pandits didn't put united voice, their educated leaders in Delhi Chandigarh, London, Newyork gather to party but not to put a face (baring exception).

How many Yadavs have courage to stand for Krishna Janmbhumi temple in Mathura? To stand against Aurangjeb names across the country? To stand against Mahmud? How many Hindu Rajputs and other Kshatriyas have courage to stand for Ram temple against Muslims? Ram was Survanshi Kshatriya. How many Rajputs will stand against Akbars history of forcing Rajputs to send their daughters and sisters (in lieu of not plundering and setting ablaze their territories and not forcing jaziya on them)? Akabar had princesses of 36 Rajput kings of Rajasthan in his harem. A Hindu Rajput feels very glorious of Maharana Pratap, as long as it doesn't hurt Muslims and they don't dare to express it in front of Muslims. Rajput when they are faced with Rajput Muslims of UP or Punjab(Pakistan) or Pathans(most Pathan Muslims are High caste Hindu converts), they feel very proud of them, their bravery in raping Hindus. They do psycho fancy. Jat Hindus and Sikhs are very proud of Muslim Jats in Punjab. Lahore, capital of Sikh empire, Nankana Sahib, Punja Sahib, their factories in Lahore, their bowls of wheat in irrigated doabs of Montgomery and Layalpur. Estimated 23000 women were abducted in Punjab during partition, almost entire Sikh population faced danger from Muslims, half of them were saved because Punjab was divided and half migrated from Pakistan, with most migrant families loosing some member. Sympathisers of Kahlistan, wealthy Sikhs of UK and Canada don't have courage to speak a word on Pakistan, or for the matter Kashmir where  Sikhs were also massacred along with Hindus by Muslims after 1990.

No caste is exception, just it is a matter of chance. Some statistics: 52% Jat are Muslim in Indian continent (mostly in Pakistan), 48% Rajput are Muslim ( 2/3rd in India).


In areas which are now Pakistan, contrary to common belief , the conversion of upper caste took place first, then it was followed by lower caste of the hierarchical society. It is on records that Thakurs of Sindh converted to Islam in order to save their fiefs. This happened with in first hundred years of conquest. The same phenomena was repeated when Punjab was conquered later on. Here Rajputs converted first. The conversion of lower caste was carried out by these indigenous upper caste converts subsequently so as to ensure loyalty of the subjects but most importantly to hide the shame of conversion from the eyes of the masses.

Another very shocking example, is of Bengali Hindu middle class. I wont talk about low class, hungry cant be expected to have wisdom.  Bengali Brahmins, or Bengali Hindu middle class considers itself most superior in India in terms of intellect. Bengali Hindu elite control media, JNU, secular and communist think tanks, Literature space. I didn't find many Hindu Bengali who are  ashamed of mistreating Bihari working class in Kolkata. But they stitch their lips when Bangladeshi Muslim intruders burn villages of Hindu poor class. Most of Bengali Hindu elite came from Bangladesh after genocide by Muslim Bengalis. Most of them migrated in 1945-47, 1965-1972. Just two generations have passed. None of them remember it. Most of Bengali authors in English make a career by justifying Pakistan, Bangladesh, Hindu hatred, so called secularism. Their NRI lobby in USA, UK and elsewhere? Bengal govt following footsteps guided by Nobel laureate Dr. Amratya Sen, provides salaries to imams of mosques, how proud does it make Bengali elites.

Recently I met an asshole Hindu who has converted to Christianity and is doing PhD at Delft university. He was very ardent fan of  Raj Thakre and his Maratha pride even after conversion. He insisted on rightness of his methods to cut down on poors from North India who work in Mumbai. I wondered where is his hero hiding when AIMIM is openly raping Mumbai now? Where is his hero hiding when Muslim mob of 50,000 burned the war memorial after Muslim Buddhist clashes in Myanmar? I wonder these people dont respect their fellow Indians, Biharis, Bhaiyas from UP and they talk against Geert Wilders in Nederlands, they want justice and equal respect from Americans and British. Matter of fact is that guy like most of Indians, just wash their hands in flowing Ganges, these talks are good time-pass as long as it hurts only others, they wont time-pass about Muslims they know they will be screwed in broad day light.

One one hand high cast Hindu want abolition of cast reservation to low castes, on other hand they want to get a share in reservation pie too. Barring few exceptions can you find some high cast person who is honest enough to say that despite reservation we get more than twice share in jobs compared to our population. Is it not true that High Caste have 40% share in Govt jobs, way more than their  population which is less than 20%? Is not it true that they lack in intellectual capacity to full the positions reserved for them because of historical place they had in Hindu society last 1000 years at least? Do you find more than handful of people from High cast who say whatever disparities and injustice they did to low castes was wrong? They will say there was no injustice, it is fiction. So you don't want to accept your wrongs done to your own Hindu clan, you don't have slightest remorse, how can you be sane and expect Muslims to accept their atrocities? Magnitude differs but problem remains same. I have found many Hindu groups coming up with some alibi. Is it too hard to say, this was a mistake? There is demand for reservation based on financial condition. Because they know it is very easy for low income high castes to grab the jobs, which low castes cant do. Reasons are as simple as: a Japan can build country in 20 years after Nagashaki incident but a India cant build in 20 years after independence from British, India hasn't built in 67 years. Everything is not accounted in material. Suppose, I dont have any money, I can still make much more because of my education even if I have nothing, I cant expect same from a mushar in Bihar village, simply his ancestors were not educated and education and wisdom didn't pass to him.  Have they ever protested against job reservation for Urdu teachers, Urdu translators? Haj Subsidies? Govt funding to Madarsas?

Low castes, they have no desire to stand on their feet and genuinely earn the positions which they want. Don't the low castes use historic injustices to justify their greed to shortcut? Is it not true that they want this reservation system to continue perpetually so that they don't have to compete? Is it not true that a Paswan or Dhobi doesn't marry into Chamar family and a Chamar doesn't marry into Mushhar family? Even educated low castes who were in good financial condition for two generations, they don't agree to exclude themselves from reservation. Many of low cast have converted to Christianity to get the freebies. Many converted to Buddhism, however I did not find a single word of protest when Muslims desecrated Budhdhas sautes in Ambedkar park in Lucknow. Mayawati was so adamant on building a grand park, where was she gone? Where were other gone who were telling these parks are waste of money while they silently agree to a Lion share of Indian budget going to Kashmir. They dont protest against Govt taking control of temple funds. Its a loot, we don't care for the property which we aim to loot. Any money outside once family is ok to be looted.

If a Hindu beats low cast, media will show, low caste leader, people will protest. If  Muslims desecrate a temple of Ravidas, or a church or a temple of Budha worshipped by low castes, low castes themselves conveniently consider it acceptable, they will say Muslims are taught that they have been like that what to do, let us move on.

जो गोत्र मे शादी कर ले इंसान, उसे जाती से निकल देते हैं, उसकी हत्या तक कर देते हैं. पर जो देश का सौदा कर आए, ISI से पैसे खाए  पत्रकार, नेता, अफ़सर. उसका सम्मान करते हैं,  उसे अपनी बेटी देते हैं.

अगर मद्रास का हिंदू पंजाब के हिंदू के साथ खड़ा होता तो किसी की पाकिस्तान बनाने की हिम्मत ना होती. अगर भारत के हिंदू कश्मीरी पंडिटो के साथ खड़े होते तो किसी की हिम्मत ना होती की पंडित को छु के देखे.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KVJ2evFHX5A

Coward can never find any place, he keeps running away, from Kabul to Lahore to Kashmir to Jammu. Wherever he goes, he becomes unsafe after few years. 

My understanding and experience says a wise man of character can shake the world, he is more powerful than many butchers. Fact is we didn't have that character and wisdom, else we wont produce traitors in every house who for the sake of career and money become shameless hypocrites.

 Politicians and social activists who get money for their NGOs in the name of social activism and justice to low castes, they all keep money and have made it a business. Name a single low caste politician who has gone beyond business of vote bank.

A word about communist parties and people, they are more concerned about Palestine 5000 miles away than 50 miles away Bangladeshi Hindus, neither about Kashmir. They don't mourn partition, they don't mourn massive forced emigration of half million Kashmir Hindus, they don't mourn thousand of temples in Kashmir which were burned, but they mourn Babri demolition every year. They supported creation of Pakistan in 1946, for Chinese attack in 1962. they participated in direct action day rally by Muslim League in 1946. But so called communists are pride of Bengali Hindu intellect. Nowhere in the world you will find a communist party lobbying for a religion and behaving like a Islamic party. Dravidian parties of Tamilnadu, socialist parties, regional parties of Telangana and elsewhere they all licked Muslims, never focused on development, made big fortunes. But in all these cases passions were created in name of some justice, some reason. People knowingly indulged.

Can we assume that an educated person in Mumbai, Delhi, Kolkata, votes out of ignorance? No, they vote knowing everything to fulfil some immediate greed for themselves, their family, which often come in form of dividends for a particular cast, group or affiliations. They knowingly chose to burn in hell rest of population so that they get little more preference. When their interests cross with interests of Muslims they submit without a fight, because they had no moral conviction in their actions or thoughts ever, everything was show off, how one can expect them to stand up.


Those who live among enemies they know they are insecure but those who live with dishonest neighbors they are most insecure.

Let us talk about Army. During Kargil war, many staff who were called on duty they committed suicide, took poison so that they don't have to fight. I know personally few people who worked in army. They were not special or honest. They worked for salary, for job. If they get a choice that they will get double salary and more facilities most of them will quit army. Only difference from Muslims is Muslims will deceive army without any reason, but a Hindu will do it after taking very heavy bribe. So a Hindu wont do  it normally. And after some member of family gets killed in some operation in Pakistan border, or Kashmir its very convenient to tell my family member was a great patriot, and next moment you fight for getting gas agency, petrol pump from Govt. I exclude people and families who have patriotism but I can say they are a minority.

Everyone knows about budging Indian authors, historians, intellectuals from JNU, and how they create passions  for Maoists and jihadis. A young student of Journalism learns first how their seniors predecessors made fortunes. An aspirant of civil services from Bihar and UP works very hard, because he knows once he is selected he can earn thousand times more illegal salary than a normal job, he can earn so and so amount from flood relief package and such amount from food subsidy system (meant for Below Poverty Line people). Govt staff just look for opportunity to strike so that they don't have to work. They want their salaries to double every year but they should not have to work, most of them are absent from their duties in rural areas, whenever they get chance. I had a Hindu batch-mate during bachelor whose ancestors had migrated from Lahore in 1947, they came with only clothes on their body, but they made fortunes when some family member became in-charge of rehabilitation supplies for immigrants. Many authors of Kashmir Hindu origin who fled valley in 1990s, have made a career by writing about Kashmir problem in a manner which benefits only Pakistan and Kashmiri Muslims. Read Rahul Pandita, Mahesh Bhatt, Aarti Tikku Singh, Anjana Kashyap or many of them.

Peaceful and tolerant or insensitive to problems of group? Later is true. Thinking men talk about non-violence/humanity to avoid mutual destruction, kind men talk out of innocence, cunning talk about Humanity to fool others. Hindus keep fooling every other Hindu.

There was no shame ever since they used to pass they keys of forts to invading Muslims for personal favors. Have you read about Kalyani, the diwan of Rohtas? He conspired with Sher Shah Shuri to hand over Rohtas fort, in lieu Tons of golds he received, which he planned to give to his widowed  daughter Kalyani. Kalyani refuses it. But in most cases people didn't refuse it even those days.

If Osama Bin Laden were to fight an election from Mumbai or Delhi, media would have found hundred qualities in him, just for small money or even free, just to be in good eyes of Laden, get favours and maintain their track record for future clients. Some Hindu castes, would have found many virtues in him after promise of freebies and giving them more power against the other castes whom they are jealous of. All Hindu castes have done it. In all parts of India. Didn't certain castes vote for a Govt in UP which ordered open fire on Karsevaks? Didn't their vote percentage increase after that?

Hindus are not able to protect Hindus in Kashmir, Srilanka, Bangladesh and they feel they should be superpower, UNSC permanent member. They will share biryani with Pakistanis and Indian Jihadis, while USA will protect them and fight terrorism. Nobody cares about terrorism as long as chances of his own house getting caught in flames is very low.

My relatives in Bihar, so religious and I would say more honest than most of Indian families. I have 40 cousins around in my extended family. I asked few of them to come to RSS sakha, or to read some patriotic literature which I would give them free. None of them or their parents agreed. But they all spend so much time in puja and most of them have a room reserved for multiple of Gods. My own parents were too much concerned about me wasting money on books, and Hindu activities. I always questioned their blind faith and reason for wasting money on Gods, stones, pilgrimages? They had no answers, answer is they are selfish. They fear God would destroy their happiness, they want a good future.

Hindu talk often about family values and love. Most Hindu  Girl/ boy will talk about virtues of arrange marriage until they find a better bargain in Love affair. And they stick to family mostly because they have no choice. I think not even 1% Hindu families would agree to a relation in which partner is not up to their bargain in financial condition and physical attraction, other qualities foot.

Most of Indians, Hindus find all the information about job, they show astute cunningness in day to day life, in all matters of life, investigate things excessively in financial matters. They gather relevant information somehow. I can say Indians are most competent in these things. Cant they see writing on the wall, don't they know what they are doing? Indian boy or Indian girls are more dishonest in pre-marital  love affairs than in west, Indian girls just look on pocket.

Savarkar puts it in this way: "ये  हिन्दुस्थान का नक्शा जो हम बचपन से देखते आए हैं वो अब विच्छिन्न हो चुका है, दो टुकड़ो मे फाड़ दिया गया है, ये पाकिस्तान हिन्दुस्थान की छाति मे घुसा बान है, यह रज्य कौन सा है किसने इसे बनाया? मुसलमानो ने नही, इंग्लेंड ने नही, हिन्दुओ ने इसे बनाया है " (''This map of India which we were seeing since childhood has been torn away. this Govt of Pakistan is a arrow in the heart of Hindusthan, what is this Pakistan? Who created this Pakistan? Muslims didn't create it, British didn't create it. We have created it.  Hindus have created it. '')

Hindus didn't chose Savarkar or Hindu Mahsabha, they chose Congress. How uncomfortable it would be to fight aggressors, and how comfortable it is to sacrifice Hindus of Pakistan, Bangladesh and those living in Muslim areas, you simply need to sit in home and feel glorious about your liberalism. If  get abused by Muslims even after sacrificing, it will not matter you have no stake at all. After all they abuse Hindus, and not your family or you.

Hindus themselves are so dishonest and still some Hindus feel Muslims should have some self respect, they should acknowledge their Hindu ancestry. You are fully confident that your neighbour doesn't deserve respect of your attention but people of foreign mindset should respect you?

Shame?

Did Hindus ever have shame in last 1200 years? Don't try to hide yourself in scriptures and glories of the past. May be my great grandfather owned an elephant, so what?

Masochism is an alibi to save skin. Non-violence, Buddha, Gandhi all are evoked conveniently as a tool to justify what we do.

This is not a matter of cowardliness, liberalism or pacifism, this is a matter of moral dishonesty.

Generation after generation, parents, teachers, elders, friends, family, neighbors, all have passed this unwritten code. Everyone is complicit.

I would like to quote FB post of a lady on Nalanda Ruins. 

"I have increasingly ceased to view these as instances of destruction by barbaric foreigners, but a measure of the Hindμs' own lack of character. Fact is: They did not destroy us. We failed to defend our civilization and heritage and have no value for it in the present. We have no perspective of our civilizational journey, collective experience or an idea about the need to fiercely defend it. Else we would not, oblivious of this history and after losing 2/3rds of our ancient geographical reaches, still be gratifying these parasites of hell breeding and eating away at our sacred land, splurging benefits, exemptions, privileges, concessions on them, sponsoring the ideologies that destroyed our civilization. Hindμs are a degenerate, emasculate nation. The average Hindμ can compromise any principle, justify any evil for achieving his narrow, selfish personal aims."


Note: I don't include those friends who worked day and night, putting halt to their academic progress, jobs, to see Modi as PM, to show the mirror to society, to fight against aggressors in their own ways. In all ages there are few exceptions. 
_______________________________________________________________________________


Some excerpts from talks of Tarek Fatah

jahan jahan angrej jata tha, pichhe pichhe paltan, log uske pichhe...Naukari dilwa do sir ji....Plz I am a good man, a good typist." "Naukari de do...kaun ruler hai usse koi matlab nahi, jo bhi ruler hai uski naukari kar lenge...Rajput matlab, jo bhi Raja hai ham usko baap man lete hain......aap jo chahenge mai kar lunga, but mujhe paise de do...

jo jalsa tibbetans ne Indian army ke favour me kiya, usme koi sau tibetan the, ek indian nahi tha Toronto me...sare indian apne gharo me baithe the, fair and lovely laga ke. 
Indian diaspora lobbying me bahut kamjor hai. photo khiichwane me number one hai. (reminds me of Delft Univ, before 2014 elections a groups of Muslim Indians and secular Indians were abusing Modi in most bad way...everyone went against me when I put the facts..., when he became PM and came Brussels, Indian students arranged bus service for those who want to attend)....

...Bharat me jo problem hai, wahan ka jo bureaucrat hai, wo pure mulk ko slow down karta hai...aap dilli me chale jaiye, sam ke wakt hajaro bachche prepare kar rahe hote hain civil service me jane ki (masses have no interest in sceince or anything which brings real knowledge growth). Jab puri kaum ko sirf apni pakki naukari ki fikar ho jae, to ek badi clerkial si elite nikalti hai, jo chijo ko ahista karne me lagi rahti hai, jo kaisa ghar allot hua hai us type me lagi hai, ye na to wo maratha fauj paida kar sakti hai jo das din me bengal pahuch jae..
America me gandhi ki murti todi gai, by anti race rioters, Indian defend bhi nahi kar rahe the, bahar nahi aa rahe the, gandhi ko defend karne ke liye, han me han mila rahe the,...not ready to defend the most respected man in the international politics...not willing to defend their own...padhe likhe log...

Tarek Fatah was physically attacked in Punjab University in India, by Pakistan loving Indian mob. 
_______________________________________________________________________________

Hindu Ignorance and Deception in Daily Life 

For Hindus, it was just a change in govt, nothing of their business.  All Muslim tribes kept coming, British came, it was all flutter-less, it happened but nothing was happening to their home, their dharam (piety) was intact (by not touching food from Muslims and not marrying with them, though a neighbour was forced to eat, he was removed from cast). Totally insidious, interested in petty local stuff, had no interest in nation. Feeling of nation didn't exist. No interest in what is happening outside. No eagerness to change, learn new things.

But we never question that. How will we ever remove this disease?
Nothing has changed because still it is not questioned.

It reflected in what Naipaul wrote on Gandhi. Chapter 8: Renaissance or Continuity.

I was thinking about Nalanda University, original Sanskrit papers of Ashvaghosh was there, his dictionary of Buddhist terminology, burned by Muslim invaders. But more important question is why people around there did nothing to  save the manuscripts? They were ignorant. They had no value for those work. They valued only their own salvation. They were idiots who won't understand the value. Same way like today most people don't care about anything except personal needs or luxury. They were no different from invaders.  

Why Indians like meditation so much! Even Lalu, Mulayam do meditation. Thousands come to meditation camps, but nobody comes to protect a neighbor. It helps them more to stay silent when they need to speak up and instead they wish to ignore or see the lie, deceit treachery without getting overwhelmed. Lie has become daily necessity. People lie to each other and themselves, just to maintain good relationship, favors and save themselves from burden which comes when u have some spine. They lie so much that truth becomes very painful. If you can control your mind with impunity, see someone getting cheated and stay calm or be partner in cheating while dont feel pang of conscience, then you are likely to be more successful in life, for that they meditate, the most evil guy (who used to threaten with murder in simple arguments, used to say he is man of Ranveer Sena, he will get people abducted, he had assaulted on me and everyone had kept silent and insulted me when I took the matter, because my acts were making them uncomfortable) during my bachelors used to meditate to get more efficient. I have seen the way people shamelessly go ahead to insulting nation, stab conscience to appease their Muslim friends, politicians and goons.

Lie is part of culture. Every one keeps lying, keeps smiling. Like monkeys (i scratch your back and you scratch my back) everyone grooming the other one. I lie to you, i praise your acts, you lie to me you praise me, we all do that. In the process we all undermine the things which we care least about. We undermine nation, honesty, character, real empathy everything like that. Speak truth and see their restlessness. 

You will always find thousands coming to yoga camps, temples. But when needed. 

If you keep more social group more contacts more you need to be shameless, and adapt to deceit. It is considered if you are in such group, you are for some benefit and you cant undermine others without getting yourself gutted. 

Best thing stay away from people, else you have to blame only yourself. 

Counterfeit Secularism is Hypocrisy

In the name of secularism, most dreaded criminals are protected, their acts are swept under the carpet. Partition of  India, forced eviction of non-Muslims form Kashmir, and east-while parts of India were all justified in the name of secularism.

I have written some lines in Hindi about this business.

ये नेता तथा अधपढ़ बुद्धिजीवी जहर  के व्यापारी हैं ।
ये लोग एक ही जहर की पुड़िया आपको अलग अलग लेवल के पैकेट में बेचते हैं ।
इस पैकेट पर कभी समाजवाद, कभी सेक्युलरवाद, तो कभी जातिवाद का ठप्पा लगा होता है ।

इन जहर के व्यापारिओं ने शांतिप्रिय समुदाय से आपकी सुपारी ली है ।
इनका एक ही मकसद है, आप जहर खा के  बेहोश हो जाएं ।
शांति प्रिय आपकी गर्दन उतर लेंगे और आपकी बहन को लेके जाएंगे ।
और नेता आपकी जेब का सारा पैसा ले जाएंगे इसी बात की डील है ।

जहर बेचने से पहले ये आपको विस्वास में लेते हैं ।

इनके लिए बाबर देसी है पर कृष्ण और राम आपका कोई नहीं ।
पाकिस्तान हमारा भाई है, जिन्नाह सेक्युलर है, बांग्लादेशी घुसपैठिए और रोहंगिया आपका भाई है ।
पर कश्मीरी पंडित आपका कोई नहीं, पाकिस्तानी हिन्दू आपका कोई नहीं।

इनके लिए धरा ३७०,  और मुस्लिम पर्सनल लॉ एकता है ।
RSS कम्युनल है,  आतंकवादी फ्रीडम फाइटर हैं, पथ्थरबाज शांतिदूत हैं ।

इनके लिए पप्पू जीनियस है, लालू ईमानदार है, ओसामा और हाफिज सईद साहब हैं ।
पर हमारी सेना शांति का दुश्मन है, चौकीदार चोर है, और हिन्दू आतंकवादी हैं ।

एकजुट हो जाओ, बटन दबाओ, जहर के व्यापारियों को सबक सिखाओ 

Saturday, April 11, 2015

Future Roadmap for Hindu/Indic Civilization.

I was very critical of USA and UK, for their self interest in cold blood they divided India and created Pakistan and helped fanatic Muslim forces in Indian continent. Their whole motive was to have a army base and a state in region which dogs their agenda. They used Pakistan against Soviet and now to play a cat in Arab politics and against China. Just as they helped create Israel or created many nations in Africa, Latin America as per their own convenience. (I am supporter of Israel like majority of Hindus Intellectuals, but here I talk about intention)
I am happy that USA gave arms ammunition to Pakistan, which they bought to annihilate India and Hindu Civilization, but they will annihilate themselves with those weapons.
There is huge probability that Pakistan will collapse in near future, and somehow we are better off that they are not in India, a 550 million strong Muslim population would have completely engulfed India into civil war. Now we have 200 in India, 200 in Pakistan 150 in Bangladesh.
Balochistan is going soon out of hands. NWFP will join Afghanistan sooner or later, remaining Sindh will have good relations with India, Punjab a landlocked territory of wolves tearing each other.
A nation born on self denial, self hatred, hatred of ancestors, history, language , culture, hatred for their own race is now on verge of death.
5-6 generations will pass when they realize they couldn't see themselves, where the path will lead them. A sadistic pleasure from Jihad, death,mutilation.
Jihad like most of the emotional concepts is an addiction, which makes one feel better, but will never let u rest, no capacity to self discriminate.
Sometimes a step too far is u never get out of it until you destroy yourself completely.
My suggestion to rational Hindus nationalists would be to strive diligently and learn as much critical thinking from west as possible, at they same time re-research our own ancient wisdom which I have observed are best philosophical literature to manage ordinary Human brain, they are result of critical thinking not blind emotion. Best brains will now need to update it and include more knowledge (a process which stopped 1200 years ago) while omit some.
Stop with nothing less than complete truth.
World is slowly heading towards complete control of problems of life, metaphors will not work too long, living in darkness one can only fool oneself. Same for cultures.
Hindu wisdom can offer soothing breeze in this period of transition. And will/should ultimately melt down into global civilization which it has enriched with Vedas, Buddha, Geeta and Ramayana.

Sunday, March 15, 2015

'Religion' is Apartheid and Flawed Western/Islamic Concept

This post is just to answer many friends, who have asked me about Hinduism, Buddhism and difference. What Hinduism constitutes. Post reflects my understanding and facts I came through.

I wrote another blog as well: 
https://danasurdanu.blogspot.com/2021/06/why-polytheism-makes-sense.html

In my view, so called religion is creation of western and middle eastern perception. Values, kindness, love, ethics has been there even before our ancestors climbed down from trees in Africa and started walking on two legs. See the elephants society, monkey society. It is part of evolution. So if someone claims that religion means values etc. and claims that religion started after certain person got enlightenment then facts dont agree with that. Word religion needs to be eliminated.

To discuss the main topic, to deal with it we need to go into history of Hindusthan.
Hindu word itself came from distortion of Iranian pronunciation of Sindhu river and people living across it, as Hindu. ('S' in samskrit become 'H' in Persian, like the main Persian God Ahur Majda was called Asur in Sanskrit and still exists in all Hindu texts as Asur as reference to Iranian Aryans)
Greeks called it Inde, Portugese distorted it further as India.
But there was no central belief system in India as it is perceived today.
Dharma the translation of religion found in dictionaries is wrong translation. As dharma is a wide subject, for Hindu people it meant all forms of ethics and duties.

Land of Hindu people was separated from rest of the world by natural barriers. If you look to geographical map, on western side Suleman and Kirathar mountain ranges and then Hindukush mountain ranges(meaning Mountain of death of Hindus) on west of Kabul valley, provide effective barrier to avoid large scale migration and intermingling with our Iranian neighbors and  Arabs. On west side only few narrow passes like khaiber (Now on Pakistan Afghanistan border) led access to India.



Source: http://www.freeworldmaps.net/asia/pakistan/map.html

In the north and east, Himalayas isolated India completely.


So we had a territory which was completely separate from rest of world. We had one of most fertile land mass and very healthy climate. All this helped development of a civilization, people had extra time so they used it for art and thinking.

By this time it must be clear to reader, how Indians (India, Pakistan, Nepal, Bhutan, Srilanka,   are Hindu.

There were always incursion from tribes outside India, on western border but they were meak mostly, even when outsiders were strong and they defeated Hindu emperors, they adopted the local culture and became part of Hindu society as some new cast for examples Jats, Gujjars etc.

Hindus developed philosophy and story telling quite early, as they had lot of time to think after eating and other activities. It was a custom by wise people to portray or start a good cult in form of a new story, sometimes knowingly sometimes unknowingly. Many thoughts developed in North, south, east and west. We can say vedic thoughts were most popular among them.

First Vedas were written by a Rishis, I am not sure Ved Vyasa alone could compile all vedas, or he had some texts before him, only he better put things together, or it was just shruti (words listened, memorized and passed) before.

After that Upanishadas were compiled, then Puranas and Ramayana, Mahabharata. There is lot of contradiction about actual years when these texts were written. And there were many other scriptures in different parts of India, which are popular and sacred to local Hindus. You can find such distinctions in every 100 kms.

But all I can say that all sacred texts, as a form of explanations of  Dharma, Morality, supernatural God, developed in sense of popular life styles and subjects.

Treatment was more based on class, people were either warriors, or class of thinkers, or traders or tillers. Many didn't classify in anyone of them, these classifications were fluid (We can see cast system becoming rigid after period of Mahabharata and certainly from around 600 BC and during Muslim rule).

Till now all Hindus were Hindu.

In 563 BC,  Buddha was  born in a Hindu Warrior Family. Mahavira was born 599 BC. I am bringing Mahavira here to explain a phenomena that goes unnoticed often whenever a shallow analysis of Indian so called religions is done.

At age of 36, Buddha felt he has grasped the reality while meditating under pipal tree and then he felt necessity to help others also get rid of pain and suffering. He started moving and preaching. Buddha promoted others who were convinced with him to assist him in preaching and to preach after him. He asked them to live begging like he did himself. Disciples of Buddha were called beggars. Begging in Maghi language (Magahi is present language being spoken in Magadh area, where Buddha lived, in time of Buddha it was Pali language) is Bikha, in Pali also it was Biksha, and Bikshu meant beggars. So to live no confusion, disciples of buddha were called beggars.

They were certainly one of the ascetic sects like we have today Naga sadhus (sadhu means ascetic seeker),  Vaishanava Sadhus, Shakta sadhus, Kabirpanthi sadhus how many. It is personal choice of citizens the kind of attention individual  pays to certain sect, but as a Hindu, I realize that it is inborn in Hindus to respect all views.

Little more on this. My village is 15 kms from Rajgir (old capital of Magadh). Begging is not a shame, my own grandfather was a Lawer in British India, he had certain problems and he performed rituals, he collected all stuff by begging. It is a noble act, to own nothing and live on alms. Still in Bihar province (Magadh in ancient times) in India, in villages, some people beg as custom, when they are doing penance or have some belief. Also during festival dedicated to  Sun God (chhath puja), people from well to do families, gather all the food and other things for rituals by begging.

Mahavira did follow even more ascetic life and traditions, he came up with elements of Dharma which were more nuanced and fundamental than analysis of Buddha, Mahaviras was linked a line of thought, which 33 sages before him contributed. They were called Jen sadhu meaning ascetic meditating seekers.

Buddha and Mahavira were essentially few of the sages striving for knowledge and bringing succor to masses in their own style. Before Buddha there were hundreds like him, after Buddha there were hundreds like him. Shankracharya, Kabir, Nanak, Eknath, Jaydeva, Ravidas, Ramanuja, Chaitanya Mahaprabhu...many many.

Geography had a big role in what was passed ahead and in which part of India. Buddha and Mahavira both spent their life of teaching and meditation in Magadha and near by kingdoms of east India (present day Bihar, eastern Uttar Pradesh and Nepal).


Kings of Magadh and nearby Kingdoms in Ganges valley were most influential kings those days. King of Magadh and all other Kings of the region, fought battles in ethical manners and never harmed peasantry and working class. Evidence of ethical battles can be seen in Mahabharat itself. It meant, thinkers and rishis and yogis they remained sacred and patronized all the time, losses in ethical warfare was minimum.

It was natural that all Magadh kings had enough wealth and they patronized Brahmin, Bikshu (the so called Buddhist monk), and Jen intellectuals in his court. Each king made enough donations to all saints and sages during festivals. Like on auspicious occasions sages of all traditions performed rituals for King. I guess my ancestors were influenced by Buddha, Mahavir and Santana all at different times. In far south in Tamilnadu Kings debated, thought and patronized both Shaivite and Jainism. They kept changing between being more passionate towards one or another. 

To get a feel, every university has studies in different engineering or art subjects, professors of different disciplines, while it is part of same university and area of a professor doesn't become part of his identity in sense religion becomes in Abrahamic societies.

All the thoughts and traditions, influenced by Buddha, or Traditional Vedas, or Mahavira, or many others which existed that time were a subject of debate and had patrons everywhere in cities specially.

After 200 years of death of Buddha a group of Bhikhus decided to organize and compile his teachings, and they wrote the tripitaks after that.

Buddha gave all his speeches in Pali. Now local Maghi language.

Similarly teaching of 34 ascetic saints who were called Jens were compiled.

Until now no religion was there.

304 BC King Ashoka was born, 266 BC, a 38 years old Ashoka had won all the Kingdoms of india through warfare. Now he attacked Kalinga. War continued till 262 BC, about 200,000 deaths, still king of Kalinga didn't submit, After death of king his daughter takes the sword. Ashoka had an emotional feat and refused to fight women. Ashoka sunk in deep regret over the bloodshed he and his army had done. A Bhikshu consoles him during that period of agony. Ashoka when he comes into senses, he decides not to fight a war again in life and he vows to spread dharma in all the known world. His life is changed, now he starts promoting Dhamma ( Dharma in Pali language), in which he puts essential elements of buddhas teachings and his own thoughts for a peaceful painless living of all humans and even animals. He establishes traditional hospitals all over the kingdom for animals also (can be rad in translations of his edicts from Iron Pillar of Sarnath and several other places).


He sends his sons, daughters, grandsons to other countries to spread the dhamma. Dhamma became sole goal of king Ashoka.

Today we don't have teachings of Mahavira, or other sages, spread all over the world, because they didn't get any Ashoka. 


Kings of Magadh had built several buildings (Vihara in pali, Vihara is a so called monastery) for these bikhus, among them Nalanda, Vihara Shree were largest.
Ashoka donated 100 villages to Nalanda, and helped to establish a grand University there.

All the major structures related of Budha were built by Ashoka. Some later by another king Kanishka.

Still all Indians were Hindu and Hindu bikhus were promoting teachings of buddha in south east Asia and rest of world as dhamma (Dharma), ''Buddham sharanam gachhami, Dhammam sharanam gachhami''.

One can notice in every Hindu family, something like father is worshiping Shiva, mother might worship Parwati, son might be going to ISCKON and daughter might be going to arya-samaj temple. These ways of approaching God never sticks to identity of Hindu. Ashoka spreading teachings of Budhha was just like a son having more interest in ISCKON style of puja.

After Ashoka, kings of Magadh had reduced interest in Buddha, some king was influenced by teachings of Jen ascetics, some by intelligent Brahmin.

Teachings of sages and scriptures had varying influence depending on time and kind of patronizing it receives among rich, inclination of people themselves, but there was a respect for all scriptures, and all sages (bikhus, brahmins, or Jens or others) in all times, all scriptures became part of Hindu knowledge heritage. Just like fashion of clothes changes in modern world, but essence of cloth is to cover ourselves, and all kind of cloths serve that purpose.

One particular feature was, teachings of Buddha and Mahavira were more popular in trading class and cities, because they had money and luxury to patronize bikhus and ascetics and to follow principles. Farmers in villages were less influenced by intellectual novelties, which cities saw.

In all times, in Nalanda University itself there were several types of bikhus and other thinkers, teachers and students. Only requirement to get admitted in Nalanda was intellectual capacity. There were 1400 teachers and 10,000 deciples at time when Chinese tereveller Fahyan visited Nalanda. Each teacher used to be author of ten books at-least. There were mathematicians, philosophers, ayurveda teachers, hedonist thinkers, atheists, the one who considered Buddha as God, many who considered other Hindu Gods or Mahavira to be more important, tantriks, many considered Buddha as teacher.


If one visits Nalanda museum, he can see the sculptures recovered from ruins include many Hindu pantheons. And to remind these traditions existed before Buddha also, a glimpse of that can be found in Upanishadas, which was written in time when all the sages struggled to understand dharma, humanity and everything.Trying to understand it much deeper, more better, and all were continuously producing many versions of their understanding of Dharma. History of India is full of such periods of intellectual churning.  A famous  philosopher with atheistic views ( I forgot name) made corridors Mahakal temple of Ujjain his seat, where inside sanctum there was Shiva.

Around 600 AD or so bikhus started becoming lazy and lost the charm as they were patronized too much by wealthy trading class in North and East. Brahmin priests like Shankaracharya and many later toured all over India to to spread their own understanding of dharma. Dhamma of bikhus became old junk, like many other previous explanations which lost its popularity after some time or many didn't ever become popular. Still thanks to old institutions established by early kings, Buddhas message kept spreading into outside countries from Nalanda and many other monasteries.

AD 708, India was first time attacked by Muslims. AD 712, third Muslim attack and first conquest of Muslims in Sindh (India, presently in Pakistan), all Young men were butchered, all women were abducted and all children were taken slave and converted to Islam. For the first time in History of India, there were two types of people, Hindu and Muslims.

1199, Muslim General Bakhtiyar Khilkji after gutting all cities in north India, he arrives at heart of Indian buddhist teaching, Nalanda University. Complete University is gutted, 9 storey building of library was in flames for six months(I am not sure fact or exaggeration). All cities were full of Muslim soldiers who did not want to see a single temple or Vihar, a single brahmin or bikhu. In villages brahmins survived, Jens survived in cities in Rajput kingdoms of Rajasthan, and Gujrat. Few bikhus who managed to survive, fled to Nepal and other mountain regions.

(From now on, the followers of Buddha in east Asia, Tibet, Japan, China were completely cut from their intellectual fountain-head, Magadh, Nalanda. They developed independently thereafter in the East Asian societies

Still Buddha remained a teacher or God but not mark of religion. But when Europeans came to east, they saw people  following Buddha as a religious group. Just like their understanding followers of Jesus Christ forming a separate identity a religion, Christianity. For the first time in History of world we had a Buddhist religion. )

From then  on, east and north India saw Muslim rule, where Hindus were not allowed to read and write, build temples, spread or pursue knowledge openly.

Things started changing after Maratha Hindu King Shivaji from Mumbai area conquers many territories in mid of 17th century, but by this time most part of memory of Buddha, in this part of India (Bihar) is lost.

When British conquered complete India in late 17th century, for the first time in history of India there was detailed classification of people on basis of religion according to concept of religion understood by British. This served two purpose, one to divide Hindus and keep Hindus confused about their identity, second to make Hindus feel ashamed of their heritage, identity, and establish British Christian supremacy. Every every possible group of people were persuaded to identify themselves as some different religion. Sikhs, Jains, Hindu, Zoroastrians, Muslims, newly converted Christians. Hinduism was invented, Sikhism, Jainism. 

(Before 16th century, there were small Christian and Jewish settlements in cities in west cost, and they received all kinds of freedom by Hindu kings, but they remained attached to their different non-Indian identity and didn't dissolve in Indian society. India was only country where Jews were not persecuted. 
On contrary to Christian settlers, Zoroastrianism almost became part of Hindu society as one of the Hindu casts.  Zoroastrian Persians fled Iran after Muslims conquered Iran and everyone was forced to convert in Iran.  Zoroastrians had a rule that in certain vicinity of their main Fire Temple, only Zoroastrians can be there. King Jadav Rana in Gujarat gave a part of his territory to Zoroastrian Persians, to build Fire Temple, to pursue their life style freely. Later on they forgot distinction and became part of Hindu society, adopted Hindu culture. Nowadays thanks to British there is a separate Zoroastrian religion in India, but still they intermarry and share customs with Hindu neighbours, and there has never been a single conflict in last 1400 years.)

In India Buddhas only memory remained in form of few symbols like date of Buddh Purnima (the date of birth of Buddha according to Bikram samwat, the Hindu calender), People whenever had found broken statues of buddha from Muslim period, they restored them in Hindu temples like one of their Gods.

During British period in late 18th century, British archaeologist saw a pattern in description  of Buddhist texts being followed in east Asia and mountain regions of Himalayas. After researching and archaeological excavations, most of the physical symbols like Stupas, Iron Pillar of Dhamma built by Ashoka, Bodh Gaya,  ruins of Nalanda University were located. British informed world about existence of a new religion Buddhism.

Europeans and their sycophants in India saw this as new opportunity to degrade Indians, to show British Christian supremacy, distorted stories were produced about Buddha being a rebel and many things.

British were in Hurry to recognize as many possible religions in India as they could.

Even now, Indian Muslims are called Hindu by Arabs, during their Hajj pilgrimage.

Personally, as a child, I only knew that there are two types of people, Hindu and Muslim. Buddha was like one of Hindu Gods, which my mother would ask to respect, it came to my knowledge much later that Buddha is part of another religion also, the so called Buddhism.

The only reason I understand about an Indian Muslim being different from Hindu is his refusal to respect the other view, his refusal accept the heritage of  Hindu ancestry. Only reason I see a Indian Christian different from Indian Hindu is his refusal to respect any other view.

One of the oldest sun temple in Nalanda, which is close my paternal village, sun temple of Aungarika dham, it was attacked by Muslim army and like all other temples it was being converted mosque. Unfinished task, they closed the door in east and opened a door in west of temple building (towards Makka), they left it incomplete. Inside the temple is broken statues of Budhha, Mahavira, Sun God and Ganesha. Hindu villagers have no grudge against Muslims for whatever happened. But same wont be true if it had happened otherwise.

Today also, there are many types of spiritual trends, many sects in India. Among social groups, Brhamkumari, Aryasamaj, Sanatani, if one counts it will be thousands. If one goes by personal beliefs then there are 1 billion sects because there are 1 billion Hindus. Church, Muslims or anti-nationals they would certainly like to call it hundred religions of India, and tyranny of Hindu elite.

One more example, Chinese society has seen several influential thinkers, but they did not call it religion of Confucious or Buddha or religion of Lao Tzu, they remained Chinese. 


Sawarkar, Vivekanand and many true Hindu intellectuals of modern India never found Buddha as separate from Hindu.

Tallest Ideologue of Indian Hindu nation, V.D. Sawarkar said in his book 'Hindutva', Every human who considers India as his/her holy-land is Hindu.... entire humanity is single race.  Sawarkar himself didn't believe in existence of God. For  Sawarkar his belief was merely a personal opinion, which existed in harmonious company with 330 million other personal opinions of all Hindus (Hindu population in 1940 was 330 million).

 According to me, essence of being Hindu is not worshiping one of pantheons, but to strive to  establish Dharma/ethical living, striving for wisdom, truth with same vigor as our ancient rishis did.

In Hinduism, atheism is also considered to be a valid path to spirituality, as it can be argued that God can manifest in several forms with “no form” being one of them.

I consider Hindu-ism, the ism of Hindus as intellectual property, which ancient sages and todays intellectuals created and updated for moral well-being of  Humanity. Just like science, arts, literature etc.

Humanity cant experience its true spiritual potential,  unless we open our minds, learn to respect all explanations of Dharma/Ethics  on merit of kind of character it develops in people, kind of harmonious  life it brings for living beings of this earth. We need to grow together, share the wisdom, and bread, that is only way out in face of adversity and sufferings facing us today.

In late 20th century and 21st century, Indian middle class and lower middle class is too greedy and corrupt to act (not just think and speak) for nation and Hindu spirit, self improvement. Society is just a tool to fulfill personal needs. Gods are just a mean to fulfill greed and hunger for wealth, prayers are sham.

Indians in cities are more materialistic than western people. No wander, Indians didn't only continue with British classification but many used it for advantage of a particular group etc.

Khalistan movement, and support it received in 1980s among rich Jat Sikhs, recent development of according religious minority status to Jains,  jostling among all cast groups to get reservation in job and to get special privileges from Govt, are few examples.

The fad of conversion to so called Buddhism and Christianity is not inspired by justice or wisdom, but mainly a matter of convenience to get freebies from Christian missionaries and anti-national elements. I have seen many incidents of Hindu converting to Islam to get married to some girl or to get one more wife after his wife dies, which is immoral act as they leave kids in limbo. Can it be called call of wisdom or greed?

As I see today majority among all caste and class of Hindu has only one ambition, to become wealthy and make material for his own family.


My suggestion to rational Hindus would be to strive diligently and learn as much critical thinking from west as possible. At they same time re-research our own ancient wisdom which I have observed are best philosophical literature to manage ordinary Human brain. 

Hindu wisdom is result of critical thinking not blind emotion. Best brains will now need to update Hindu literature and include more knowledge in the light of modern  scientific discoveries (a process which stopped 1200 years ago after Muslim Invasion of Hindusthan) while omit some which have become anachronistic.

Stop with nothing less than complete truth. World is slowly heading towards complete control of problems of life, metaphors will not work too long, living in darkness one can only fool oneself. Same for cultures.

Hindu wisdom can offer soothing breeze in this period of transition in the world marred by sick religious philosophies. And Hindu identity and wisdom will/should ultimately melt down into global civilization which it has enriched with Vedas, Buddha, Nanak, Mahavir, Upanishad, Geeta and Ramayana.

A very good read from Dr. Koenraad Elst
http://www.sutrajournal.com/when-did-the-buddha-break-away-from-hinduism-koenraad-elst

I had a sardar batchmate, his great grandfather had vowed to give Pagri to their son if theu bear a child and they started wearning turban after his grand father was born, but he used to visit temple as well and he was more religious towards Durga, laxmi etc, he used to keep fast for some godesses on certain days in week. Some of my friends who can be labelled Jain by British system, I never saw any difference and never felt they are not Hindu, they were more Hindu culturally than me and they never said they are not Hindu.

VHP all India secretary is Surendra Jain. One of founding leaers of VHP was Master Tara Singh. Amit Shah never said he is not Hindu, but he is Jain by British system of religions.

There is nothing like atheism and Hinduism. Every human is born natural without any theism. He or she evolves his or her thinking, superstition, logic in natural ways in search of truth, generation after generation information keeps adding, diversifying as different people attempt differently. If Hinduism is about anything, it is this natural curiosity, evolution of thinking and diversity. Diversity helps in sustaining ideas, creating new revolutionary ideas. Just like diversity in gene pool, diversity is the key to innovation, to adaptation and to finding new and new information. On contrary the  religions like Islam and Christianity, they are fixed, values thoughts are imposed without any consideration as last truth.


WHO IS BRAHMANA: Vajrasuchi Upanishad


The Jiva does not make anyone a Brahmana, because with rebirth the Jiva migrates from one body to another, this Jiva remains the same individuality while the body changes. Thus, it is not Jiva which can determine whether one is a Brahmana.

The Deha or body does not make anyone a Brahmana, because every human being's body is the same, constituted of the same five elements, everyone ages, everyone dies, people from all classes show various combinations of dharma (virtue) and adharma (vice) characteristics. All color complexions similarly, are found is all castes and those who are outcaste. Thus, it is not the body which can determine whether one is a Brahmana.

Does Jati or birth make a Brahmana? It is not so, because sacred books tell of great Rishi (sages) born in various castes and diverse origins, such as Vyasa from a fisherman's daughter, Kaushika from Kusa grass, Valmiki from an ant hill, Gautama from the hare's posterior, Vasistha from a celestial nymph, Jambuka from a Jackal and Agastya from a mud-based vessel. Regardless of their birth origins, they achieved greatness. Therefore, it is not the birth which can determine whether one is a Brahmana.

Jnana or knowledge too does not make a Brahmana. It is not so because among Kshtriyas and others, there are many who have seen the Highest Reality and Truth, and therefore Brahmin knowledge is not what makes the Brahmana.

Karma or deeds do not make a Brahmana, because all living beings perform the same deeds, past and future embodiments are common, and everyone is impelled by past. Thus, deeds do not make the Brahmana.

Dharmic action is not the essence of the Brahmana either. Many Kshatriyas give away gold, such virtuous actions and anyone performing religious rituals is not what makes a Brahmana. 

Brahmana: the Vajrasuchi doctrine

Who indeed then is Brahmana? Whoever he may be, he is the one who has directly realized his Atman (innermost self, soul). He is the one who understands that his soul is without a second, is devoid of class, is devoid of actions, is devoid of faults. He knows that the Atman is truth, is knowledge, is bliss and is eternity. He is the one who knows that the same soul in him is in everyone, is in all things, pervading within and without, something that can be felt but not reasoned. He is the one who is free from malice, who fulfills his nature, is not driven by cravings for worldly objects or desire or delusions. He is the one who lives a life untouched by spite, ostentation, pride or the need to impress others.



Additions: 

1. I do not think there was something called Hindu Dharma or Hinduism until 18th century. There was notion of Hindu, in the middle ages, but that also came form Muslims calling native people Hindu. In pre-Islamic India there was no notion of Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism. 
Buddham Sharanam Gacchami, Dhamam sharanam gachhami, sangham saranam gachhami. 
Where is Boudh dharma in that? Where is notion of Buddhism in that? 


Maria Wirth blog
https://mariawirthblog.wordpress.com/2017/07/23/buddha-was-a-hindu/

a twitter chain

2. Counsel of Chandragupta was Chanakya a Brahmin, but his spiritual mentor was Bhadrabahu, acharya of Digambar Jainism.