Pakistan Kashmir Jihad Indian Muslims

(1)  Iman, Taqwa, Jihad fi-Sabilillah (Jihad for the cause of Allah) is the motto of Pakistan Army. Pakistani army is not just guardian of Islam, Pakistani army is guardian of Islam. In a survey 80% of Pakistanis identified themselves as Muslim first, Pakistani second. 

(2) When Indians shout Bharat mata ki Jai. They shout Allah hu Akbar. 

(3) Hindus were not allowed in Pakistani army. In 2006, Danish, a resident of Sindh became the first Hindu cadet in the army, when Musharraf was in power. 

2022 October: Pakistan where a 75 member cabinet of PMLN has no NON MUSLIM MINISTER. The PTI does not even have a Non Muslim in its 60 member CEC. 

According to the Pakistan constitution, Prime Ministers, Presidents, Chief Ministers and Governors must all be Muslims.

Pakistan's parliament blocks bill allowing non-Muslims to become country's Prime Minister, President.

October 2019

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/pakistan/paks-parliament-blocks-bill-allowing-non-muslims-to-become-countrys-prime-minister-president/articleshow/71436276.cms

(4) Even though Muslims constitute 97 per cent of Pakistan’s population, they continue to demand stricter blasphemy laws (Islam is in danger), further seeking State’s patronage of Islam, against 3% minorities. They say in India they are minority, what is excuse in Pakistan? 

(5) Under Article 295 of its penal code, any Pakistani Muslim who feels his or her religious feelings have been hurt, directly or indirectly, for any reason or any action of another Pakistani citizen can accuse blasphemy and open a criminal case against anyone. According to the Federal Shariat Court, the punishment for any type of blasphemy is death.

(6) Indian and Pakistani Muslims work together on many things. There are inter country marriages, relations. Jamia-tul-Madina is a chain of Islamic universities, 200 in Pakistan, 11 in India. 

Why they don't use their connection to ask Pakistanis to stop terrorism in Kashmir and elsewhere? Same way Muslims in other parts of India have connections with Kashmiri Muslims. Common organizations etc. 

December 2020 Tablighi Jamat organized Jalsas, in which they called Muslims from many countries, COVID spread from there.  Indian left liberals had defended Tablighi Jamaat and called anyone who exposed them “Islamophobic”. December 2021 Saudi Arabia has banned Tablighi Jamaat over terror links, calling it "one of the gates of terrorism". Will the Indian Liberals now call them also Islamophobic? Tablighi jamaat was founded in India in 1920, by Maulana Muhammad Ilyas, a Deobandi Chisti-Sūfi. 

Tablighi, Jamat e Islam, all these are international groups, working in India, Pakistan, Bangladesh. They only cooperate for Islam. Like Indian Muslims rioting for anything and everything that happens in Turkey, France, Myanmar, Denmark etc. 

Most of the terrorist groups such as Taliban, follow Deobandi version of Islamic Sharia. 65% Madarsa in Pakistan are Depbandi. In India most Madarsa are either Barelvi or Deobandi.  Both of these Islamic ideologies is followed by many Islamic terrorist groups. But they say Hindutva, RSS inspires terror. 

(7) 1984 Pakistani Islamisation program referendum: A referendum on the Islamisation policy of President Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq was held in Pakistan on 19 December 1984. Voters were asked whether they supported Zia-ul-Haq's proposals for amending several laws in accordance with the Quran and Sunnah, whether they wanted this process to continue, and whether they supported the Islamic ideology of Pakistan.

(8) This is how they humiliate us. All this is complete fiction. After killing every Hindu in Kashmir, they make this kind of movies to rub salt on our wounds. 

And people of Pakistan believe in such fiction. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8rG40PwcClU

This is their so called humanity. 

https://twitter.com/pakistan_untold/status/1480528670506639363

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pUhNoy2qx6c

We made Muslims hero, Khans in Bollywood always. And this is what they do. 

(9) Before 1965 war, President of Pakistan Ayub khan had given a statement in their bilateral conversation with Americans- "we want to have a joint military with India to fight communists"...... When Atal Bihari Bajpayee was visiting Pakistan to build goodwill gesture, pakistani soldiers were occupying vacanted Indian Peaks in Kargil.....

(10) Difference between Islam and other cultures, see the difference between Laddakh and Kashmir. 

2003, when Vajpayee Ji was to come Srinagar and do a public rally. Before that there was bomb blast few kms away, sound came at the rally venue. A kashmiri Pandit who had left valley in 1990, his house was blown. Some Muslims in my hometown were gossiping, achha kiya do char aur dhamaka karta...That was their hate..

(11) Zia ul Haq talked about Nizam e Mustafa, now Imran Khan talks about Riyasat e Madina, but he rants about Hindutva, RSS, BJP, intolerance in India all the time, as if his business is not Pakistan but India. 

https://tribune.com.pk/story/2339025/spirit-of-riyasat-i-madina-transforming-pakistan

Imran Khan, in his 2002 article, blamed the West’s follies upon, “Philosophers like Darwin, who with his half-baked theory of evolution had supposedly disproved the creation of men and hence religion, were read and revered”.

https://www.arabnews.com/node/217634

(12) Entire focus in Pakistan is on whether Quran is being taught properly or not. Inspectors check that, that is their main concern. And Namaz is compulsory in many schools. 

They provide separate seats (10 of 342) for non Muslims not because they are just and fair. But because their entire system is Islamic in which there is no place for non-Muslims (that includes Ahmadi as well) in the main system.  They are not giving anything special. There is no such need in a secular country like India because here everyone has same rights. 

(13) One Paki said: "There was a time when Muslims of sub continent got together and wanted their homeland and got Pakistan. Today Kashmiris are asking for it to be part of Pakistan, not India."

Me: If that is so then why they did not go to their homeland? If India is such a bad place the why did they stay here? why only Kashmir? 95% Indian Muslims don't live in Kashmir. If decision of Kashmir has to be on the basis of Islam then that decision has to be taken by all Muslims not just 5% and they already made that decision once in 1947 by creating Pakistan; not going there was their own choice, you buy food then whether you eat or throw is unimportant. Hindus vacated Pakistan, because Pakistan was a bad place, without any safety for life, or respect, and no Hindu wants to go back to Pakistan. Why Pakistanis don't live in homeland? which they said will be developed like Switzerland, where is that Switzerland? Even Mohajir don't want to live there.

(14) 1990 kashmir: Stories of Girija Tikkoo (gangraped and cut by saw alive) and Sarla Bhat (gangraped killed) were never reported by media because it did not suit their hypocrisy.  People start vacating a place when their women are not safe anymore, abducted, raped. No matter how many fake stories Muslim tell, but they live here, because their women are safe among Hindus. 

Islamization of Kashmir started under Sheikh Abdullah, then Farrukh Abdulla, then Gulam Mohammed Shah. 

Attack on temples and Hindus took place in February 1986. 

Jagmohan was made Governor by Congress first time, for five years. Second time by Janata Dal. 

14th sept 1989, JKLF killed Tika Lal Taploo.

2nd Dec 1989, VP Singh became PM. Mufti Mohammed Syed was CM. On 8th December Rubiya Sayed was kidnapped by JKLF, five key terrorist were released within four days. One of These terrorists Mushtaq Ahmed Zargar was again arrested in 1992, charged with many murders and later  in Indian plane IC814 hijack, he was released. 

This was between 8-12 December 1989. Anti Hindu posters were put up, ads came in Newspapers by unknown people that Pandit should vacate Kashmir or get killed. 

Now Jagmohan was appointed Governor again on 19th Jan 1990. 20th Farookh Abdulla resigned. VP Singh essentially left leaning government said we don't like Jagmohan, they wanted healing touch. May 1990 Jagmohan was removed. By that time every Kashmiri Pandit had left. 

In Kashmir, anyone who spoke about India was shot. And they say why we spoke against Pakistan. 

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/rCi71ngdhwQ

On 19 January 1990 there were 1 million Muslims (of 4 million population) in the streets, shouting slogans "Agar Kashmir me Rahna Hoga Allah Hu Akbar Kahna Hoga".  It was local Muslims who did it, genocide of Hindus. They were neighbors, co-workers. After that night in next few days almost all Hindus left Kashmir. 

19 March 2022: Three hindu youth were stabbed when they were coming after watching Kashmir Files Movie in Kushinagar. 

Loss that kashmir went through.

Hindu were killed in Kashmir because they were Hindu. Muslims did not died because they were Muslim. 

(20) A list of 50 hate crimes by Muslims. 

https://www.opindia.com/2019/06/dara-hua-musalman-here-is-a-list-of-50-hate-crimes-that-busts-the-narrative/

(21) Jia ul Haq brought an ordinance in 1985, that no woman in Pakistan will be allowed to wear Saree. He banned Saree, as symbol of Hindu culture. 

(22) https://twitter.com/swati_gs/status/1507922170713821185

This Maulana is leading speech in Mosque after Friday prayers, in Jammu. 

This Maulana in India demands that movie Kashmir Files to be banned. 

He says that they have ruled over us for 800 years, and will rule us in future, while we will be wiped out.

And the big crowd cheers "Allah hu Akbar", not a single voice of opposition. 

Point is that even when several Hundreds of Hindus were killed in Kashmir, and half million Hindus migrated from Kashmir to Jammu and Delhi etc, still not a single stone was pelted on Muslims in Jammu, by those Hindus who came from Kashmir. Neither local Hindus of Jammu threw a single stone, they did protests and public speeches but they didnot do any violance or spoke against Islam. 

Now this Maulana and Muslims of Jammu can raise such slogans, that itself shows that they are very safe among Hindus.

Terrorists live the next door, people hide them and during army search operations, they say that they are relative, nephew, brother in law, son in law etc. 

Women there throw hot rice water on army men. 

RJD, CPI(ML) MLAs tear ‘Kashmir Files’ tickets inside Bihar Assembly, Congress MLAs refuse tickets. RJD, CPI(ML) MLAs tear ‘Kashmir Files’ tickets inside Bihar Assembly, Congress MLAs refuse tickets. RJD spokesperson Mrityunjay Tewari said, “Why does the government not show us films on unemployment and issues of common people’s interest? They want to further their communal agenda by showcasing a film like ‘Kashmir Files.’

This is the mentality, which thwarted any action or civil movement in 1990s, even information was thwarted from reaching to the people. 

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Actually if you talk to a Pakistani or a Muslim he will give a very different account. 

Some ay they killed because those Hindus were RSS member. But first of all entire narrative in media about RSS has no head or tail, it is complete fiction. 

Second those Kashmiri Hindus were not RSS members. Third they had no right to kill, even if some say 1% among them were. 

Another excuse they give is that it was all Indian governments conspiracy to malign them. 

If that is true then why they oppose and threaten any Hindu who wants to return his home, even today? 

They also first deny and then give excuse about why they killed Hindus in 1971 in east Pakistan. 

Just like every Muslim I have talked to, has never accepted that 9/11 world trade center and pentagon attack was done by Islamic terrorists.

They all said about some conspiracy. 

Some said it is conspiracy of Jews, that day no Jew came to office in World Trade Center. 

Some said that US intelligence and army attacked WTC so that they can attack Afghanistan. And that person was a Shia, PhD. 

Guys in TU Delft, born and brought in Netherlands, studying at TU Delft, said it was a Jewish conspiracy.

________________________________________________________________________________________________________

My grandfather went to Kashmir in 1975. 

And he said that there was extreme hatred for Hindus and the Indian government even then. 

Long before terrorism started in 1989. 

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

Kejri mocked Kashmir Files, said release it free on Youtube, why asking tax free. All MLA laughed. 

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

Pakistan was not created to do justice to Muslims. Pakistan was created as Pak army claims "To do Jihad in the cause of Allah" as its politicians claim to make "riyasat e madina" As Pakistans constitution and blasphemy laws claim to protect Islam. But leftists say that Pakistan was created because of RSS. Did Jinnah ever mention RSS? Did Muslim leagues 1940 Lahore resolution mentioned RSS? 

_________________________________________________________________________________________________

Hindus work in UAE for the same reason as Muslim work in UK, USA not Afganistan. Wipro will have most shareholders Hindu, those who gave him bussiness were non-Muslims, Those who run the business are Hindu. Hindus made APJ Kalam honorable. Pakistan or Muslims dont honor any non-Muslim, not even Gandhi. 

____________________________________________________________________________________________________

Mindset of Pakistani people

During partition Muslim League politicians, who were mostly large landlords, were busy seizing the lands of fleeing Hindus and Sikhs. Studies show that 40% of wealth in the present Pakistan belonged to non-Muslims.  Most of these lands and industries were grabbed by rich Muslims for free and by terrorizing their owners.   

____________________________________________________________________________________________________

OK Hindus have caste system, but made Muslims destroy Jain, Sikh and Buddhist temples? Muslims and Christians go to every corner of the world too every people finding faults in them. 

________________________________

2nd January 2023, terrorist barged into two Hindu homes in Rajouri. Checked aadhar identity (checking religion) and fired indiscriminately, killing seven including two children. 

https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/rajouri-terror-attack-jammu-and-kashmir-terrorists-barge-into-hindu-houses-kill-civilians-2316140-2023-01-02

_________________________________________________________________________________________

In the 1990s, the federal national curriculum required sixth class children to know about “India’s evil designs against Pakistan” and “to make speeches on jihad and shahadat”.

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________________________

1968 Bhutto said in his speech that genocide is being committed on Indian Muslims. So these things are not new. It always happened. 

Today 21 Jun 2023

Western media, so called human right groups all do garbage reporting which very often has no relation with reality whatsoever. There are two implications of this: 1. An influencer person in west can sell his soul easily, like in other places 2. Public in west is not capable of differentiating between truth and fiction, like in other parts of the world, that is why influencers and media get away with it. 3. It is dangerous, because western public assumes that they know everything and they are open minded and correct.

Pakistan's Higher education council Bans celebration of Holi and other Hindu festivals across Universities in the country to save Islamic identity and image of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan.

‘There was no shortage of empty lands in Mughal era, they why did Mughals built their mosques close to/over temples only? What was the purpose?’

Allama Iqbal

Urdu poet Mohammad Iqbal, who became the chief ideologue of the Pakistan movement, was a bitter man who lamented the failure of the Muslim invasion of India. He mourned that the invincible armada of Hijaz (the holy land of the Muslims) that defeated so many civilisations had met its watery grave in the Ganges. He literally wept over the defeat of Islam in India and looked forward to a re-conquest. Iqbal’s biographer Maulana Syed Abul Hasan Ali Nadwi wrote that the poet was frustrated because “instead of breaking idols….stretching a begging hand for a loaf of bread has become the Muslim’s profession.”

Apni Party Waqar Bhatti says it on TV and then shares it. 

कौन से घर में वापसी ?

अगर कोई गैर हिन्दू वापस हिन्दू समाज का हिस्सा बनना चाहे, यानि घर वापस आना चाहे, तो वो ५००० घरों में से कौन से घर में आएगा? 

दूरबीन ले के उसको खोजना पड़ेगा फिरभी कोई घर नहीं मिलेगा ।  

एक व्यक्ति समाज में जीता है , सिर्फ विचारधारा से काम नहीं चलता ।  

वो समाज उसकी दैनिक आवश्यकता की  पूर्ति करता है, उसे सम्मान और गौरव  देता है, उसे सुरक्षा देता है ।  

हिन्दू अपने पडोसी के घर में आग लगती है तो खुद भाग जाते हैं।  ऐसे लोग दूसरों को क्या सुरक्षा देंगे।  

अब हिन्दू तो अपने ही समाज के चमार  मूशहर लोगो के साथ न तो रोटी का सम्बन्ध रखते हैं न बेटी का।  

९० % हिन्दू अपनी जाती ही नहीं उपजाति के अंदर विवाह करते है।  

अगर कोई वापस आता है तो कौन उसके बेटे से शादी करेगा ? 

मूशहर भी नहीं करेगा, वो भी ये सोचेगा की पुरे दुनिया की गंद मैं ही क्यों लूँ ?

और ये द्वार हमने सुरक्षा या किसी अच्छी चीज के लिए नहीं बल्कि अभिमान के कारन बंद किये है। 

 

शिवाजी महाराज का समय आया, महाराजा रंजीत सिंह का समय आया, लेकिन कोई घर वापस नहीं आया।  

अभी मुसलमान  लोग अपने पत्र उर्दू के बाद अंग्रेजी में छपवाते हैं पर हिंदी में नहीं।  

एक कारन ये भी हैं की अंग्रेजी भाषा सफल लोगो की भाषा है।  

हाल ही में अफ़ग़ानिस्तान से आये हिन्दू और सिख भी यहाँ नहीं रहना चाहते, वो कनाडा और जर्मनी जाना चाहते हैं।  

एक क्लर्क की नौकरी के लिए हम हिन्दू आपस में लड़ मरते हैं, सरकारें गिरा देते है।  

ऐसे घर में कौन वापस आना चाहेगा? 

अपने ही बिच देख लें, कौन करता है पुरोहित का काम? 

जो बहुत ही निर्धन होता है, वो अनपढ़ तथाकथित ब्राह्मण पुरोहित का काम करके अपने बच्चो का पेट पालता है।  

हमारे पास सिर्फ दम्भ है, थोथा अभिमान है।  

ऐसे २०१३ की बात है, थाने गया हुआ था किसी काम से , बहुत परेशान होने के बाद मैं थानेदार से मैं बोला

 "इसी लिए यहाँ कोई नहीं रहना चाहता है, इसीलिए मैं नॉर्वे जा रहा हूँ।"

थानेदार बोला "जाओ, वहां नहीं होगा? जहाँ जाओगे वह होगा, वहां और ज्यादा होगा।"

ऐसा ही हमारा व्यवहार है, संस्कार है। हम एक दूसरे को धोखा दे के जीते हैं, खुद को भी धोखा देते हैं। 

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Sanatan Dharma, which Sri Aurobindo called “life itself” in his famous Uttarpara Speech of 1909, “is not circumscribed by the confines of a single country… A narrow religion, a sectarian religion, an exclusive religion can live only for a limited time and a limited purpose.” That is why Hinduism should also be an open system, welcoming anyone who wants to join.

What I see in daily life is there are 100 crore Hindus, but nobody is there when there is any need. Look around and see. Everyone is on his own, except those who have created sycophant or chelas by giving favors. Society doesn't care about its weak, doesn't respect its greats. Just see how we treated widows in the past. How we treat other Hindu. Hindus themselves pull down other Hindus. And to every so called Hindu his/her ego self interest is utmost important. Many other things. 

Compared to that no matter how bad Muslims are to non-Muslims, but they relatively take care of their poor, weak. I recall from my hometown, how they gave money to that blind beggar who came every evening, to that mentally ill female. In case of Hindus, people next door also don't care. They want liberation and good from God for themselves.   

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

A good article: Waseem Rizvi/ Jitendra Tyagi

https://theprint.in/opinion/becoming-a-hindu-is-not-that-easy-even-if-a-waseem-rizvi-turns-into-jitendra-tyagi/779215/

Though Waseem Rizvi was a Syed, the highest rank in Indian Muslim hierarchy, he was inducted in a comparatively low Tyagi caste. A top-ranking Muslim should be made a Brahmin. Why else shall they convert? After all, this will be a downgrade for them in the social hierarchy.

Those who hold top rank in the social hierarchy, also play the role of opinion leaders among the followers of that religion. If the top-ranking persons of a religious order refuse to convert to Hinduism then the middle and lower castes among them will also hesitate.

Why was a Syed not inducted in the Brahmin caste after he accepted Hinduism? The problem is that an outsider becoming a Brahmin is simply not possible. Brahmins are born, becoming one was not possible. Rizvi was adjusted in the Tyagi caste. 

We can only guess whether the Tyagis will consider marriage alliances with the family members of Jitendra Narayan Singh Tyagi. If this does not happen, then his position will become untenable in the Tyagi caste. 

Becoming a Hindu can be complex

B.R. Ambedkar has written and explained this problem in detail in his thesis Who Were the Shudras: “The real criterion is not the wearing of the sacred thread but the right to wear the sacred thread. Understood in its proper sense, it may be said without fear of contradiction that the right to Upanayana is the real and the only test of judging the status of a person…”

Ambedkar argues that caste prevents Hindus from being a missionary religion. He argues that caste is inconsistent with conversion. “Problem is where to place the convert, in what caste? It is a problem that arises in connection with conversion. It is a problem which must baffle every Hindu wishing to make aliens convert to his religion.”

This is the reason that despite all efforts of Arya Samajis and RSS volunteers, the idea of shuddhi and the project of shuddhikaran remains a non-starter. 

R. Jagannathan of Swarajya says, the larger Hindu society does not know how to accept the new converts in their faith. He asks a pertinent question: Why did Hindu society fail to win back even those Hindus who converted due to fear and coercion? He concludes by saying, “The only way Hindu demography can be maintained or expanded in India is by making Hinduism a missionary faith, but this means creating an ecosystem to support such missionary activities. Islam and Christianity are leagues ahead of Hindus in this race. But if we don’t start building this ecosystem now, the two Abrahamic faiths will gain at our cost. Hinduism will shrivel and wither in the land of its birth.” 

If RSS actually wants to make India a pure Hindu Rashtra, it must undertake the project of large scale shuddhikaran, and annihilate caste amongst Hindus. To do so, the RSS will be required to denounce (the current interpretation of caste based on birth) in religious texts, Shrutis, Smritis, even the Vedas and Bhagavad Gita as these texts provide sanction to the caste system. 

It was not long ago that Dalits weren’t allowed to enter the Kashi Vishwanath temple.

Gandhi had painfully mentioned this fact in 1936, “Yet, in spite of all that love for Hinduism…I am here to tell you that so long as the doors of the Banaras Temple are closed against a single Harijan, Kashi Vishwanath does not reside in that temple, and I could not possibly approach that temple with a belief in its sanctity, or in the fact that by worshiping there, I should be purified of my sins. I can have no sense of piety in respect of such a temple. And what is true of Kashi Vishwanath is true of every other temple in India which bars its doors to Harijans.” He goes on to say, “I will take by way of illustration the greatest temple known all over the world, viz. Kashi Vishwanath in Banaras. The Lord who is supposed to reside there is known as the Lord of the Universe. And yet in the very name of that Vishwanath the Savarna Hindus have today the impudence to say to the Harijans, ‘You shall not come to this temple!’

The Indian Constitutions came into effect in 1950 and Article 17 abolished untouchability and forbade practicing it in any form. Despite that, it took another seven years for Dalits to be able to enter the Kashi Vishwanath temple in 1957, after violent protests and boycotts by prominent religious leaders.

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Reservation is one of the many results of the divisions created by caste system, reservation did not create caste system. When you divide the people and deny them, how do you expect them to think about common interest and your interest? Here I see that people accept and assimilate white foreigners in their family, but not lower castes. 

_________________________________________________________________________________________________

जितेंद्र त्यागी ने की खुदकुशी की बात, बोले- सनातन धर्म अपनाने पर नहीं मिला वो प्‍यार

जितेंद्र त्यागी ने आगे कहा, “1400 साल पहले पता नहीं कितनी नस्लों के बाद हम अपने घर वापस हुए और घर वापसी करके हमने सनातन धर्म को कुबूल किया क्योंकि सनातन धर्म से हम पहले से ही प्रभावित थे। महादेव, भगवान श्रीराम, देवी-देवता, भगवान श्रीकृष्ण और खासतौर से हिंदू संस्कृति।”

उन्होंने हिंदू समाज के रवैये और विचारों की तारीफ की और कहा कि हम पहले से प्रभावित थे, इसलिए हमने घर वापसी को अच्छा समझा। उनका कहना है कि सनातन धर्म में घर वापसी के बाद उन्हें वो प्रेम नहीं मिला जो, पुराने रिश्तेदार को उसकी वापसी पर मिलना चाहिए। जितेंद्र त्यागी ने आगे कहा कि वह बहुत डिप्रेशन में हैं और उनकी जिंदगी का कोई ठिकाना नहीं है। उन्होंने कहा कि दुश्मनों से मरने से बेहतर मैं ये फैसला करूं कि मैं अपने जीवन को खुद समाप्त कर लूं, लेकिन मैं सनातन में हूं और मरते दम तक सनातन धर्म में ही रहूंगा।

उन्होंने कहा कि सनातन धर्म में वापसी के फैसले को आज भी सही समझता हूं, लेकिन थोड़ा सा अफसोस ये हुआ कि मेरे साथ एक ऐसा रवैया अपनाया गया कि घर के उस वक्त के सदस्यों में तो आपस में बहुत प्रेम है, लेकिन पता नहीं क्यों, हमकों नहीं लगता कि हमें वो प्यार-मोहब्बत मिली।

Psychology of Muslims in Indian Continent

Western people in general feel sympathy for Muslim masses, their poverty, illiteracy. But this is how Muslim masses think, that they will someday takeover the west and make a nude show of their men and women. That they will defeat west and rob them. They still live in robbers mindset of 7th century, the way they did to India in 1947, Soviet Union in 1980s, and now to USA. They don't think about economy, education etc. Did Mohammed Bin Qasim think about economy? After creation of Pakistan they needed money to run the country, they robbed Hindu Baniya. Then they made money by fooling west. Now Taliban is selling afghan governments and American trucks etc. 

Of all the things humans fear, the fear of being harmed by another group of humans was most deeper. Tiger and snakes can't kill us easily. And that primitive habit has remained. Dominating other human groups brings a sense of safety, pride, and positive emotions; which success in economy, education can't bring. It is like overcoming biggest opponent, challenge. In their case, story in their mind keeps creating enemies. And they get busy trying to dominate them. 

This pic below shows what they fancy. They don't fancy roads, schools, good clothes. They fancy Jannat/heaven, Victory. There is a vicarious pleasure in robbing others, humiliating, showing them strength of your will, enslaving. This pic below being shared on twitter was one of the pics circulating during brief Taliban and Govt war in Afghanistan. 

This is what they think about west. They think that western people are characterless spoiled materialistic, western ladies are whore (forgive my words, I am only telliging what I understand). 

They think they are heroes. 

With their mindset, what would be best policy? It would be to leave them, alone. They have an emotional need to fight, to die etc. If there is no-one else to fight, they fight among themselves. They are capable of self destruction. They will drag you in their destruction if you keep them in your neighborhood or engage with them. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lNut1K34aFg&t=848s

This English documentary was made by an Indian left leaning lady. But it is fairly accurate portrayal. Their condition is bad. When the are with others, others manage economy and system and they enjoy the fruits, but Their condition gets worse when they are on their own. Islam is a negative force, people find virtue in bloodshed, poverty, and make it center of their ego. They have an emotional need to prove themselves to the ummah or Allah or to themselves, their so called bravery etc.

People under Taliban are having a very bad life, Afghanistan is completely dependent on foreign aid else half of population will die of starvation, but the number of recruits for ISIL, Al Queda, Taliban keeps increasing.

Muslims of continent still think like medieval barbarians, that they don't need to work, gain skills, cooperate with Hindus. They think the will become great by robbing and killing Hindus. Now that is not possible on large scale. Their economic condition will never improve unless they cooperate with Hindus. Media and leftists who drill this Hindu hate further, are digging a deeper hole. 

Lee Kuan was a Lawyer before joining politics. According to my conversation with a Chinese friend one of his observations was that: A Hindu client will ask to make some negotiation arrangement and solve the case, get over it. But a Muslim is likely to keep fighting the case, generation after generation. 

“I think we were progressing very nicely until the surge of Islam came. And if you asked me for my observations, the other communities have easier integration — friends, inter-marriages and so on — than Muslims ... I would say, today, we can integrate all religions and races except Islam.”

https://www.pri.org/stories/lee-kuan-yew-dead-here-are-7-his-most-provocative-quotes

Do not return that favor to them!

____________________________________________________

Muslims talk about caste system and dalits. Did they ever share power with low caste Hindus or dalits during 1200 years of rule? They share anything only if you become Muslim. Globally did they share power with anyone?

___________________________________________________________________________________________________

I wrote in Linkedin post "All this to please people who live in denial, who are incapable of self-reflection, who suffer from identity crisis, whose inner values and beliefs are in conflict with the reality of the modern world, science, secular state and constitution. ........50 failed democracies."

Not that Hinduism is all truth and not story state of mind, but it is less in conflict with reality, less of an obstacle to reality. 

They say in Pakistan, Iran everywhere "इस्लाम खतरे में है " ; ऐसा कब हुआ पिछले १४०० वर्षो में जब इस्लाम खतरे में नहीं था? 

They always said that and prepared to fight for that, kill others for that since the time of Mohammed. तुम शहीद हो जाओ , जन्नत में ७२ हूरें मिलेंगी ।  

That happens, Islam always remains in danger. because Islam was not in harmony with nature and everything around. And now it is out of harmony even further. More in conflict as world is changing at a pace not imaginable to them. 

Islam was created through force, and it was protected and propagated through force. Force+faith. In absence of reality, it required extreme faith; because faithful must defend it against all the satanic reality in the external world. 

Remove the force and it will disappear. So there is always lot of emotion (faith) tension in the Muslim world everywhere. Same way caste system is falling apart, because it was not natural. But Hinduism survived in Mauritius, Suriname, Fiji without caste. 

When a child grows up, he doesnot fear, he asks questions. Same with humanity, as humans grow up, and become more educated, they will ask questions. 

So in Islam either a person believes, or belief is broken. There is no room for flexibility. 

It was a a cult created in desert and tension. It conquered India through force. Now it is becoming harder to maintain that force. So it is weak and in danger again. 

In Zarasthura Nitezsche said something similar, that something or some obligation created through force wont last. 

Islam like cult is likely to stay longer in the minds of illiterates and childlike people, because they need more faith to understand the world in absence of any credible explanation in their minds. Like Carl Jung said (P-60, Atomic habits), " Until you make unconscious conscious it will direct your life, and you will call it fate".

Christianity survives on fear of hellfire and things like that. 

Another thing is peer pressure. But as people mix more, peer pressure will weaken. Faith is sustained by peer pressure. 

Focus of even liberal Hindus is on becoming educated, not on growing beard or learning urdu/arabic.

Lion is lion, as long as all animals allow it to tear. When killing is not allowed, Lion will die, it cant eat grass. That brute force of illiterate savage, which makes a man like wild animal has no advantage now. Lion will never be free again to use its teeth. And it can't graze like cows.  

Islam has failed to provide anything which a normal man wants. No thinking person, normal person looks towards it for spiritual gain (they look towards Buddhism and a bit towards Hinudism/Jainism, even Jews) No normal person looks towards it for any knowledge gain; or philosophy they look towards western science and Greek works for that. 

And Islam doesn't gather followers naturally for lack of love and sympathy towards others. 

My friend Brice said "I did research on what smart people, successful people do. And I found that they work on mind, spirituality yoga...I am doing....I am also searching for truth..." He traveled to India, Srilanka, Japan..etc. Have never heard any smart person taking journey of Mekka. 

https://x.com/Profdilipmandal/status/1845394188210168087

यक्ष - दुनिया में आश्चर्य किसे कहते हैं। 

बेताल - बर्मा यानी म्यांमार का मुसलमान रिफ्यूजी का लाखों का हुजूम वहाँ से चलता है तो बीच में मुस्लिम बहुल बांग्लादेश में नहीं रुकता। सीधे भारत आता है। फिर भारत पार करके पाकिस्तान भी नहीं जाता। यहीं रुक जाता है। 

फिर भी कुछ लोग ये बताने की कोशिश कर रहे हैं कि भारत मुसलमानों के लिए असुरक्षित है! 

इसे ही आश्चर्य कहा गया है। 

भारत दुनिया के उन गिने चुने देशों में है जहां मुसलमान माइनॉरिटी की आबादी सभी धर्मों से ज्यादा तेज़ी से बढ़ रही है और ये राष्ट्रीय चिंता का विषय नहीं है। 

मुसलमान रिफ्यूजी को यहाँ वेलकम किया गया और उन्हीं लोगों ने हिंदू दलितों को नागरिकता देने के क़ानून CAA का विरोध किया। 

ये भी आश्चर्य है। 

ये सब उस देश में हुआ जहां के मुसलमान बहुल इलाक़े अलग देश बन चुके हैं। और इसके लिए समर्थन वर्तमान भारत के इलीट मुसलमानों ने 1946 में मुस्लिम लीग को वोट डालकर दिया। लेकिन वे भारतीय मुसलमान पाकिस्तान बनवाने के बाद पाकिस्तान नहीं गए। भारत में रह गए। 

ये है आश्चर्य।

Bengal was partioned before rss was born 

Problems with West

Western people would like to take pride in themselves for rigor, rationality and factfulness. My critical observation is about these only, that most of them fall short on it. 

In my observation, Western countries, specially US politics is as dirty as in India. Western people are hypocrites, they stick to their set of rules and talk about objectivity as long as it suits them, and quickly abandon objectivity or change the set of rules when first set of rules doesn't suit them. And they do it without any shame. 

Like many others, westerners like to have opinion on everything, they speak too much, without thinking critically and supporting it with facts. But there is a special problem, since they sit on the pulpit, nobody can tell them so that makes them look even more stupid and silly. They almost feel entitled. 

Many times Kings tended to be most foolish, silly and stupid person in the court and the country. Because the king has special privilege, nobody can tell the king that he is completely disconnected from reality, and he has foolish ideas. As happens in corporate offices many times here.

They are born and raised up with ideas, full of superlatives, specially in USA. "You are so nice, you know how great you are ! If you were not born, this earth would have stopped rotating around the Sun" (Well nothing happened when US lost war in Vietnam and Afghanistan.). And then that kid grows up, meets an Indian, talks some bullshit, and Indian being a typical sycophant says "Yes sir, you are great, you are so nice.." Indians crawling everywhere to get photographed with westerners, to give them a memento in ceremonies. 

The fact that average person of USA has GDP, eight times (PPP) in terms of income, means nothing more than that. Any conclusion afterwards should must be arrived by reasonable discussion/proof etc. When we go into detail, then only we can find loopholes and hollowness of frantic attempts to get to some conclusion, without concrete evidence. 

Problems of Entitlement : 

In general Western people sugarcoat their laziness, lack of completeness in examination and convenience as broad mindedness. I get very bored hearing platitudes from western and upper class white collar Indians, who talk from the place of their privilege. I agree that there are benefits of education, and in west people are more open, methodical and factual. But people in west take their view of themselves too far. 

It is economic prosperity, functioning systems, law and order, easy access to jobs and higher education which frees normal people of many concerns. Not their broad mind. 

Per capita expenditure on defense/military in many developed countries USA (2200 $) is 70 times to that of a developing country India (31 $). People in west should apply broad mind principles to themselves and remove all this expenditure, spend it on eradication of poverty, if their broad mind alone protects them.  

Visa policy of most developed countries is very restrictive, giving more access to developed countries while closing entry to educated highly skilled workforce from India and China. Tuition fee in most British universities in 35000 USD per year for non EU candidates. While it is one third for locals. 

Where is broad mind in all this? 

It has become standard in the west, people talking in certain way, nice things, are automatically considered broad mind. It is like when poor people argue, whole colony gets to know, because poor don't have walls. Same way wealthy people argue but nobody knows. Wall shields them. Wall becomes symbol of class, people confuse that broad wall protecting them with their broad mind. A high per capita income (30 times in top twenty countries, compared to India) and closed borders are like that wall. 

This standardization of broad mind is often to serve the interests of people who fall under that class. It is not for everyone on a fair basis. Why should others follow their metric and definition and standards? Why should others care about their (so called broad minds) opinion? Who are these so-called broad minds to decide right, wrong, good or bad for others? It is by effort of working arms and money in pocket that one outside that class lives. Those standards serve only people within that class. It is the mindset of a slave, to follow labels given by master. 

This broad mind thing also works like religion. That thing in the center is missing, there is no proof. But many rituals come up. Those rituals become synonymous with religion itself. Same way is broad mind thing, there might be nothing, a big zero in the name of mind, but people may follow or do many social rituals, those rituals become synonymous with broad mind, which get them place in the class of broad minded. Religion doesn't bring superstition. Religion is caused by human superstition, human ability for superstition.  And that human ability for superstition doesn't appear only in religion, but also in other walks of life e.g. politics, social life, economic decisions etc. 

People speak nice not because they are very broad minded. They don't have a mind. They don't know what they are talking about. They don't study subjects on which they make big conclusions. By definition being broad minded should mean having considered multitude of views, ability to see the problems from all angles. People take path of least trouble, least energy expenditure. People take path of standardization. Society has standardized, one who speaks nice is broad minded. So every foolish person on this earth who speaks without thinking or knowing much is considered broad minded. Not having a question in mind, being completely unaware also brings happiness. By not having questions, a person is having energy surplus, not strained. They are compared with a person who is at peace and happy, because he has figured out everything. It is the happiness of submission. I think turbulence is a better state of mind compared to that, if it is leading somewhere. 

___________________________________________________________________________________

This is what I wrote to an American citizen after he was completely wrong on too many facts. But he thought otherwise. 

"A part of the American media writes fiction. And there is a sense of entitlement among many of them. Their definition of truth is what they publish or want to be true. Not what is objectively true. They think they can not be questioned. They are like another God. Their judgement is final. They can not be examined on the basis of facts, can not be questioned, they feel entitled to be taken as true even when they are not mostly.

Definition of facts or truth can not be that whatever pops up in the minds of wealthy Americans or their editorial boards is true. And responsibility of proving facts rests first on (A) those who/what act like sources of facts, and those who take that whatever comes from (A) is fact.

It can't be that whatever starts in America is good of everyone in the world, and they are our God. And we have to blindly accept that. It was not true in the past, it is not true today. Americans are not some special species bereft of any human mistakes. And all Americans are different, so it will never make sense if some homo-sapiens of US wants to be taken as truthful, and source of facts, just because they are Americans. 

That is my opinion on fiction writers and propaganda masters in USA. Truth in itself is simple. But it is difficult to convince oneself about some truth and convince others about some other truth. Problem is not that facts are worthless, but problem is with mind which doesn't want to believe in it.

Individuals in the west think they know what is true, and good. So they can civilize, guide unfortunate misguided people in other worlds to prosperity, justice, truth and peace. They can be kind to other unfortunates. All this confidence doesn't come from some experience of the situations, or learning from their results of past interventions. They do not have much past record of responsibility in the event of their convictions turning wrong. The Basis of all this is often the feelings of the individuals."

___________________________________________________________________________________

People feel dazzled in front of west, so they accept anything, everything. I agree with Lee Kuan. He had brain and character. He could hold on, and had much more to show in the end. 

https://www.pri.org/stories/lee-kuan-yew-dead-here-are-7-his-most-provocative-quotes

If a columnist in west writes opinion, that doesn't become a fact. It only means he/she has right to write that opinion. If somebody says that what he believes is fact, it only means that he has a story in mind, according to which his beliefs are true. 

___________________________________________________________________________________

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gDtmeVAJwwI

US they make good movies, good fiction. 

They do the same with many things, conjuring up things, real and false, as it suits them. 

____________________________________________________________________________________________

Another personal mail to a western friend: "I remember a YouTube video of the widow of Daniel Pearl, she was pregnant when her Husband was abducted in Pakistan. She stayed there to find his body or something. 

She repeatedly says people are very hospitable. They tried to help me everywhere I went. Then such people go on to draw big conclusions. That it will all end, if we talked people to people, if we loved. 

I recall you. You said that guy from the middle east, he was ashamed because he did not have arrangements to give you proper respect. They like hospitality...

Upto here it is ok. Then you will go on to draw big conclusions, which have no relation with reality. 

People in Indian continent hey are hospitable to so called big people for short periods, and they equate an western/white skin/ wealthy with goodness. But that is not how people behave with each other for long periods. 

More people live together, more the chances of argument, bad faith etc. People fight for every inch of land, every single penny. You might have known that in your personal life, in your house, if not about money then about other things such as time or something else. 

People were together, they lived together and still live together in India. Until 1947 they lived together in areas which became Pakistan and till 1989 in Kashmir. But people don't behave the same way to another person who happens to be on the other side as they behaved to the widow of Daniel Pearl. People were nice to her, because she is privileged, she is American, she is white and she was there for a short time. 

What you experienced as a person, you try to project and make big conclusions, with gross simplifications. 

As if I am a fool, others are fools and you have a broad mind, only you can see it with your broad mind. 

Why don't you go and with a magic wand, talk about love and good and end up this conflict of Spain, Basque Country and Catalonia conflict, after all Spain has such a small population, only 47 million. How much money you would have saved if you had been appointed as an advisor to Trump and other presidents in USA, the entire Budget of US army is 778 billion dollars. Netherlands spend 12 billion and is part of NATO. And you said that you manage to find good in everything, everyone. Why you don't manage to find good in me and my arguments. You did not realize magnitude of what you were speaking. It was a feeling you had." 

___________________________________________________________________________________

Ignorant people are not innocent. 

Their luxury of ignorance costs someone else. 

Nobody thinks he/she s bad or doing bad, it is his her ignorance which makes bad things happen. 

People stay ignorant because it is convenient. and also because they are ignorant about their own ignorance, but it is these simple ignorant masses on this earth who are reason behind all the problems. 

Guilt of Past

Westerners occupied Americas and Australia NewZelands only few hundred years ago, wiped out the native populations there. Trafficked slave, killed millions of Africans, colonized 80% of the rest of world, fought crusade for several hundreds of years, converted people in distant countries to Christianity, burned people on stake, practiced blatant racism. They don't have much humane to look for in their history. So many people in the west apply their theories anywhere without understanding anything about that place. 

In job market, they will come up with many ifs and buts and always give preference to a local, hire a non-EU only when they cant find locals. But they expect others to follow their views, in ditto, no if and but. 

There is a lot we can learn from west. But blindly copying is not sign of wisdom. It is sign of inability of own thinking. We need to restart our own evolution in thinking. 

Western countries, many of them are inorganic entity. Countries like USA, Canada, New Zealand, Australia have formed on land of others, they have no history, no force of unity. People in Europe have been that lack of warmth, and more greed, they can not get together. They are dealing with language, memories of medieval Christian history, wars, they can't find common ground. So they call for ideas of nation based on weak ideas such as business, materialism, which doesn't appeal to human mind for long periods. We should not fall in their trap, by blindly following them and destroying our strengths. Another old civilization with continuity Japan, has not blindly borrowed western ideas. China has resisted it to a certain extent, even though they borrowed communism. 

It is same in career, understand what others say, study what is happening around, be aware. But don't blindly copy others. Their strength is their strength, it may not become your strength. 

Same can be said about monotheism. It has temporary advantages, but in long term it wont stand, it will create enemies only. Like Christianity lead to anger against Church in European intellectuals. Islam is not taken positively by most non-Muslims and has become hindrance for cooperation coexistence. 

Same can be said about Indian family system. It is strong pillar. 

Upper middle class Indians blindly copying west, don't have brain for creating something original. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zzgHf9oZIkI

Most of western people are manipulated, and they exude confidence, that they are not and we should listen to them. They are more manipulated than Indians.  

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f0HdxZ5adkM

As she said "we can be very manipulative and very dishonest when everyone of facts is correct.

It will take 100 years before areas like Pakistan, Afghanistan are stabilized and have democracy and some kind of liberty. Imagine if India was not partitioned, there would be 60 crore Muslims in 2025. They would destabilize India as a whole, like they have destabilized Pakistan and Afghanistan; like they did before 1947. India would have been another war zone like Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Afghanistan. Western countries have never faced that. They cleverly take limited number of refugees, and overall population of Muslims is less than 10% everywhere in west. So they like to preach others themselves sitting thousands of miles away safe, they are hypocrite.

They like to dictate everyone, everywhere; without putting effort to know details. But where is it that they succeeded? Could they create democracy in Afghanistan or Iraq or Syria? They left these countries in worse state, but that doesn't stop them from their belief in supremacy of what they think. They invaded Afghanistan, stayed there 20 years, they had all the freedom to implement their ideas, spent 2 trillion dollars, used best weapons, intelligence, 200000 death. But nothing happened. But that doesn't stop their mouth. Where is ideological accountability? Zero accountability, they just like to mess other countries as they wish. Before that they funded and armed Mujahedeen, supported them with all kind of intelligence. Who suffers? Poor Afghans, not them. They pushed 50 million people back 100 years just in one country. 

___________________________________________________________________________________

There are things written on a piece of paper, which feels to be right, working. And then there is man, who is subject to not only the cold reality on piece of paper, but also to dark world of emotions, feelings, brain mechanisms/workings, about which he has very little knowledge, about which very little has been written, and even less has been read, so an ordinary person knows extremely less.  To control or intervene is even more difficult, but knowing is the first step. 

Materialists reduce the whole world to things on piece of paper, to material objects. They define yes and no, rules, (and they like to dictate the rules of debate based on their limited knowledge) when reality is gray. You cant create a better quality copy image from a poor quality. And to improve quality, you need to improve first image, your vision, and to do that you also need to look within. 

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Appetite of the rich, is very important for them, so they might like to dine in some famous restaurant in New York, Hotel Taj, Japanese restaurant  etc. But is that experience of taste special and only limited to them? Maybe hyenas enjoy more while sucking the bone marrow of a week old rotting carcasses. Maybe vultures enjoy it more. 

How do we know? Millions of animal species, which of them have more ability to enjoy the taste.

Same with regards to physical experiences between opposite genders, maybe pigs have more of that feeling. 

But we upper middle class and rich humans behave as if those experiences exist only in us, special and rational; can not occur in animals, not shared by animals; Or as if when animals  enjoy the same feeling it is animalistic feeling; but when we enjoy these feelings become rational, important. It is like a cloth is not just a cloth; that a cloth is inferior if worn by ordinary man, but same cloth becomes superior when worn by someone special. 

It is same problem with western people, they feel their biases are not bias, it is rationality. They are perfectly rational, so their feelings and emotions are also perfectly rational. They can't be misguided. 

I am a wannabe scientist and am applied engineer. So what is my business in meddling with popular habits and so called popular philosophy. 

My contention is that popular habits and philosophy often represent not philosophy but incoherent mess, full of contradictions. So people can't claim it to be philosophy. When people speak and follow in their habits something with some sense, I will not question. 

But mostly as people practice in daily life and as they understand it leads to nowhere, it is blind peoples game of hide and seek. It has no right to defend itself under citadels of philosophy, value etc. It is gross ignorance and stupidity. And I don't need to be a great philosopher to see that and to object to that. 

So even to do philosophy and pursue some values one needs some rationality, thinking and observation; to know what is happening and where it is leading. Else one will be dabbling in gutter and thinking that he is being purified by Ganga s water. 

In a similar way, I object to it when western people hide in their citadel. There are good and smart people, but 95 percent people in west are ignorant as well. 

I have criticized western common human for lack of rigor. Lack of rationality even though they attempt and they think they are rational.

Western people would like to take pride in themselves for rigor, rationality and factfulness. My critical observation is about these only, that most of them fall short on it.

So they can't claim that and ask immunity from questions. I ask to not follow west blindly. To question them. 

If you have to pursue rigor, rationality, facts; pursue with all your force but dont copy the west blindly and call it rationality. 

When western people talk intuitively, and don't call it intuition but rationality, when it is cheap imitation of rationality. I can see that. As if their intuition is not intuition but fact.

Happen due to conditioning. Dogs start salivating on the cue which is linked in their mind with food. Someone is Nobel laureate, others minds start taking him as a source of truth. 

Nobel laureate has gravity has to be taken seriously but he had come up with proof on only one topic. Which means he doesn't have proof for all areas. 

Nobel laureates think their mom is wise, they are conditioned to feel that way since childhood. 

Slavery work that way. You are conditioned to take some class as a master generation after generation.

Bully uses that conditioning to their advantage.

Sense of pride, honor for ancestors that is also conditioning. We are not born with it.

That is how we learn emotionally, that is how we remember. 

A tiger mauls someone, then we remember that face of the tiger forever and never meddle with it. 

_____________________________________________________________________________

Pseudo Induction

Wealthy first world wokes and their counterparts in the third world follow something like mathematical induction. 

Since they have wealth, better passport, car, house, healthcare, and have got some degree in some area, making them better than 99% humans in education. They believe that is due to their superior ideas, thinking. 

They extend it to believe that they must be right in everything, they are no longer mortal  homo erectus. 

They don't need any verification. 

They take it as proof of their intuition, and they apply it everywhere.

 

And when faced with opposition, they dig deep. 

"How dare something I believe be untrue?"

No it can't be, a poor fagot like me must be wrong. 

It would rather be true, even if it is not. How dare....

Their thinking is no different from a savage. 

A savage is in continuous struggle in his environment, and if he doubts himself, he will get cornered and killed. 

Doubt brings returns in a very long term. 

In the short term, a person is surrounded by others who are equally confident. 

And if he doubts and tries to be rational, it will not be rewarded. 

Everyone else will claim to have made their wrong points, 

and they will feel justified, and will maul him. 

So they remain savage in nice clothes, nice words. 

But they remain savage. 

They remain like a mob, harnessing benefits of convenient narrative, no sense of objectivity except in words. 

Unless a person has mastered his own mind, he will succumb to being savage. 

Knowledge has to reach a level where it allows the person to stand against savages around with sheer logic, and so that he doesn't need that savage reaction in himself.

It has to enable the person to see through the illusion of emotional reactions and animal instincts and to overcome them through practice.  

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

When Russia attacks Ukraine: ban ordinary Russians from football tournaments & singing contests; but when Pakistan attacks India, kills our jawans, launches terror attack on our Parliament - hey c'mon be sensible, allow ordinary Pakistanis to play cricket and act in Indian films. India has been a victim of China’s aggression & Pakistan’s terrorism but NATO never expressed any sympathy. In fact, the US foreign policy encouraged both the Islamist & Communist states. 

This is hypocrisy what I see on Linkedin. Every western person is fomenting hate for Russia. 

All the western people crying for Ukraine, offering them preferential treatment in recruitment, for PhD. 

Nobody was taking poor Iraqis when US and NATO had attacked Iraq on false charges. 

They just take few when they have shortage for people to clean gutters, toilets and in the health care system to serve as nurses. 

I have seen firsthand that western people give first preference to a western citizen in any job recruitment. And second preference too. 

Only when they can't find a qualified white man they give chance to Indians or Chinese. 

If such things happen to us, we will be expected not to post such content on Linkedin. 

We will even be considered nationalist jingoistic, fascist, Nazi. 

Our parliament was attacked in 2002, Mumbai was attacked many times with multiple times.

And each time nice west people said, oh maintain peace, do talks. All the weapons used against us in Kashmir and money, somehow came from west. USA was terrorist sponsor. 

Now the nice people don't follow that advice in case of Ukraine. 

When US was attacked in 2001, 11/9, they sent army to Afghanistan and stayed there 20 years. 

Why this difference? Because nice people have a higher value for their own life, liberty and very little for others. 

When western people do it it is solidarity, humanity. 

When we do it, it is politics, small people, savages arguing over petty things.

When I was in ship in 2011, two days after we sailed from Tokyo, Fukushima nuclear disaster happened. 

And then there was a collection, every one was donating 10 dollars, 100 dollars. 

I said I won't donate a penny. 

If I donated ten dollars, that wont even get a breakfast for a Japanese, who already had trillions of dollars, per capita income 30-40 times back then. 

If I donate 10 dollars to Vanvasi Kalyan Ashram, or a poor in a village in Bihar, he will eat one month with that money. 

This idea of equality which wokes like to talk and boost is nonsense. 

If we were all equal why would there be separate tuition fee for students from Asia and Africa, different from European and American students? 

Why do we have borders? Why do they post in job vacancies, only for European nationals. 

Nobody is equal. Why do we have doors and walls in houses? 

__________________________________________________________________________________________________

Before revolution in Iran, shah of Iran was puppet of USA. 

Just like Saudi Royal family is.

One of my seniors was telling that in 1970s he went to Iran for talks with Petroleum minister. 

He was operating ships and wanted business from Iran government for their crude oil transport.

He was told that before meeting minister he has to meet US ambassador.

And US ambassador denied him permission to ship Iranian oil. Ministry could not do anything. 

What kind of open business is this? To coerce countries which don't follow US dictat. 

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

This tweet below sums up my understanding as well. That so called humanity which west or Arab world or any other power block uses does not include all humans. Specially western humanity only includes human beings of western countries: Japan, Australia, New Zeland, Europe, USA, Canada. It does not include Indians, or Arabs or Africans. 

And western media, opinion makers shout their arguments, bias, loud and loud since they control media platforms; they shout in the name of humanity, then western public feels it is about humanity. But it is never about humanity. 

It is about their own interest, and interests of wealthy partner countries; friends with interest. But they do propaganda and every time do it in the name of humanity.

It is just a bullshit, so that nice people can have some nice talks. And they never tell it on the face. I learned during job hunt, that they will always hire first a North European, then a Romanian, Russian, etc East European. Only when they can't find any European, they will hire Indian or Chinese. 

Or if job is very critical, then of course they will hire Indian or Chinese. Lot of Indians make it to jobs in west, but it is due to their persistence, not due to any equality or anything like that. Well foreigners are not equal, but even among them there is choice. For example it will be very easy for a Dutch to get a Job in Australia or an American to get in NL. But application of an Indian will not be considered normally.

They are making so much political comments in Linkedin, can we make that when our country is in trouble? They will say it is professional networking site, don't discuss politics here.

I am just thinking, had it not been for Russian weapons, India would have been divided into hundred of pieces. All the arms and money used by Pakistan against us, came from USA. In a way west was funding and arming Pakistan for our annihilation.

Definition of terrorism also varies as per western interests. Some terrorists are called freedom fighters and considered strategic partners, as Taliban, Osama Bin Laden and Al Queda were strategic partners of the west during 1980-1990. 

I am just thinking, had it not been for Russian weapons, India would have been divided into hundred of pieces, by Pakistanis who were supplied best American weapons as they were their strategic partners. All the arms and money used by Pakistan against us, came from USA. In a way west was funding and arming Pakistan for our annihilation. And China would have smashed us. As they did in 1962 war.

It is not equal game and just and fair in the world. West controls media, west has guns, Russia, China have guns.

Rest other countries are dependent on the mercy of these powers.

Whatever these gun holding power blocs decide is right.

Arab countries are another power block, due to oil power. 

US and NATO powers allowed Pakistan to develop Nuclear weapons, under their sight, because Pakistan was a strategic partner, designated by the USA as a "Major non-NATO ally". 

Even when there were hundreds of terrorist groups operating from Pakistan. Schools, Universities in Pakistan openly had posters everywhere asking youth to enroll for Jihad, against India, USSR and later against US itself. 

They supplied weapons and money to create a monster in Afghanistan. They didn't bring their own people to fight. That is expensive. They used cheap lives of others. What do they care about afghans that they were trying to remove USSR from there? Afghans would have been happier under USSR. It is not just about money, it is a national priority. It lasted for seven decades. West funding Pakistan, giving them weapons, letting them acquire Nuke, for the same nukes they have sanctioned Iran forever. 

Iran has not even acquired it. But Pakistan a very unstable country which has army controlling elected reps and army doing coup and turning governments every decade. A country which is a zoo, a terrorist factory. Because Pakistan is like a paid mafia, it is ready to get hired by any western power which pays it money. It worked for both. And they did this deal in the name of democracy/humanity. 

Those nukes can very easily get in hands of terrorists. Pakistani scientists leaked nukes to North Korea and Iran. But west was not bothered by Pakistan having nukes, because Pakistan wont target Israel. 

And US will be out of range of Pakistani missiles. And why would they care about others who have to deal with it. It almost created a third world war when USSR had put missiles in Cuba. US doesn't like any enemies in their own vicinity. 

In 2007, there was a seminar on Maritime safety in my college and it was being addressed by an American expert. A guy questioned that why is USA supplying weapons to Pakistan if they are so much concerned about Islamic terrorism. Speaker counter questioned why does India have relations with Iran. We had only trading relations with Iran, we were not supplying them fighter jets and giving them money. Why do US trade with China? We trade with China as well, not just with Iran, even when most of the insecurity comes to us from China now. 

There was famine in 1934, we got help, British govt helped us, as food could be supplied by trains through railway British had laid for connecting to ports. There was one famine during world war 2, because British govt siphoned food supplies to war zones, 20 million people died of hunger. Then famine in 1965, we received a lot of food from the USA, red wheat, as my grandmother used to tell. Our relation was that of master and beggar. 

But a nation can get respect or equality unless it has money and weapons. 

That is why I hate Indians who make no effort to stand up. Japan stood for a very short time, why can't we. But here people have no self respect. no shame. 

Indian people are worse, shameless, characterless scums. 

Because people who tolerated 1200 years of slavery mostly at hands of Muslims, must be extremely compromised and dumb. 

Which I see here every day.

_______________________________________________________________________________

"Pakistan’s space programme began in 1961 with the launch of meteorological rockets provided by the United States. ....the Space & Upper Atmosphere Research Commission (Suparco) grew rapidly in the 1960s and was more advanced than the Indian programme at the time.

Pakistan’s nuclear programme was set in place with the assistance of the US and, until 1972, had been directed towards nuclear power production and basic research. Personnel in the Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission (PAEC) were sent abroad in the 1960s for training. Canada provided Pakistan’s first nuclear reactor, the Karachi nuclear power plant (Kanupp)."

Hypocrisy of American liberals has been that they helped a terrorist state Pakistan acquire Nukes and other things, but they preach every other country to suit their interests. 

_________________________________________________________________________________

This is US Government website. 

Pakistan was included in military alliances The Baghdad Pact (1955) and the Central Treaty Organization (CENTO)

https://2001-2009.state.gov/r/pa/ho/time/lw/98683.htm

Southeast Asia Treaty Organization (SEATO), 1954

https://2001-2009.state.gov/r/pa/ho/time/lw/88315.htm

And Pakistan is global partner of NATO

How can West question us on our trade with Russia? 

We have never been in any military alliance with Russia. 

While they have supplied all the weapons which were used against us. 

I think Russia is more reliable and fair. 

They never expected India to break trade with west or USA. 

India was part of non-aligned movement. Neither in Soviet bloc nor in Western bloc. That did not make Soviet Union impose any embargo on us. But western bloc has put many embargo on us throughout history. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-Aligned_Movement

_________________________________________________________________________________